UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant     x

Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than The Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x

No fee required.required

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

0-11


LOGO


LOGO

PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

JUNE 2, 2016

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust will be held on Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time at the Union League, 140 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 for the following purposes:2022

 

Date:

Thursday, June 2, 2022

Time:

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time

Place/
Means:  

Meeting live via the Internet—please visit: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PEI2022

Purpose of the Meeting:

For all holders of record of PREIT’s common shares of beneficial interest:

(1)

To elect ninethe seven trustees nominated by the Board of Trustees and named in this Proxy Statement for a term expiring at the 20172023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

 

(2)

To provide advisory approval of the Company’sour executive compensation;

 

(3)

To ratify the selection of KPMGBDO USA LLP as our independent auditor for 2016;2022; and

 

(4)

To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

For all holders of record of PREIT’s outstanding preferred shares:

(1)

To elect two additional trustees named in this Proxy Statement for a term expiring at the earlier of (a) the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and (b) such time as all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Outstanding Preferred Shares have been paid in full and the dividends for the then current dividend period have been paid in full or declared and set apart for payment in full.

Record Date:Our Board of Trustees has fixed the close of business on April 4, 201611, 2022 as the record date for the determination of shareholdersholders of common shares of beneficial interest and outstanding preferred shares entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting. Please note thatAnnual Meeting, which will be conducted via live audio webcast. The virtual meeting will offer our shareholders the Union League hassame rights and opportunities as an in-person meeting, allowing for active participation at no cost, regardless of geographic location. During the virtual meeting, you may ask questions and will be able to vote your shares electronically. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need to log in by entering the unique 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card. We encourage you to allow ample time for check-in.

By Order of the Board of Trustees

LOGO

LISA M. MOST

Secretary

PREIT

One Commerce Square

2005 Market Street, Suite 1000

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

April 22, 2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 2, 2022:

We are making this Proxy Statement, two separate forms of proxy card, and PREIT’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 available electronically via the internet at www.preit.com by clicking on “Investors,” then clicking on “News & Reports,” then clicking on “SEC Filings and Reports” and then clicking on “Proxy Statements” or “Annual Reports,” respectively. On or before April 22, 2022, we will mail to our shareholders a dress code,Notice of Internet Availability and Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which is available at www.unionleague.org/dress-code.php.Whether orwill contain instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report and how to vote. Shareholders who receive the Notice will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail, although the Notice will contain instructions regarding requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials if you so desire. Regardless of whether you expect to attend the virtual meeting, in person, please complete, sign and datefollow the enclosed proxy card and return it promptlyinstructions on the Notice so that your shares may be voted.voted at the Annual Meeting. You may also vote your shares by mail, by telephone or through the internet by following the instructions set forth on the proxy card.Notice. If you attend the virtual meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person.

By Order ofby voting at the Board of Trusteesmeeting.

LOGO

BRUCE GOLDMAN

Secretary

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

April 20, 2016

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 2, 2016:

This Proxy Statement and PREIT’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 are available at www.preit.com by clicking on “Investor Relations,” then clicking on “SEC Filings” and then clicking on “Proxy Statements” or “Annual Reports,” respectively.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

VOTING INFORMATION

   1 

Record Date; Shareholders Entitled to Vote

   1 

Your Participation in Voting the Shares You Own Is Important

   1 

How to Vote

   1 

Shares Held Throughthrough a Broker, Bank or Other Financial Institution

1

Voting Standards Generally

   2 

Quorum; Voting by Proxy; Revocation of ProxiesStandards Generally

   2 

Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address

2

SolicitationVoting by Proxy; Revocation of Proxies

   3 

GOVERNANCEDelivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address

3

Solicitation of Proxies

3

Instructions for Participation in the Virtual Annual Meeting

   4 

PROPOSAL ONE—ELECTION OF TRUSTEESAsking Questions at the Virtual Meeting

   4 

Trustee Nomination ProcessTechnical Difficulties or Trouble Accessing the Live Webcast

   4 

GOVERNANCE

5

Nominees for TrusteePROPOSAL TO BE VOTED ON BY COMMON SHAREHOLDERS—PROPOSAL ONE—Election of Trustees by Common Shareholders

   45 

Trustee Nomination Process

5

Nominees for Trustee

5

Majority Voting Standard for Trustee Elections and Board Procedures

11

Board Recommendation

11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

12

Leadership Structure

12

Meetings of Independent Trustees

12

Role in Risk Oversight

12

Committees of the Board

13

Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee

   14 

Board RecommendationAudit Committee

   14 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERSNominating and Governance Committee

14

Transaction Committee

   15 

Leadership StructureCommunicating with the Board of Trustees

   15 

Role in Risk OversightMeetings of the Board of Trustees

   15 

CommitteesCorporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of the BoardConduct

15

Employee, Officer and Trustee Hedging

15

Commitment to Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility

   16 

Executive Compensation and Human Resources CommitteeTrustee Independence

16

Audit Committee

16

Nominating and Governance Committee

17

Special Committee Regarding PREIT’s Related Party Transactions Policy

17

Meetings of Independent Trustees

   18 

Communicating with the Board of Trustees

18

Meetings of the Board of Trustees

18

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Conduct

18

Trustee Independence

18

Standards of Independence

18

Board Service

   19 

Related Party Transactions Policy

   20 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   20 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance2021 Trustee Compensation

   20 

2015 Trustee CompensationInformation about our Executive Officers

20

COMPENSATION

   22 

PROPOSAL TWO—ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONOwnership of Trustee Nominees and Executive Officers

22

Board Recommendation

   23 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

   2425 

Introduction

24

2015 Performance

24

PROPOSAL TO BE VOTED ON BY COMMON SHAREHOLDERS—PROPOSAL TWO—Advisory Approval of the Company’s Executive SummaryCompensation

   25 

Board Recommendation

26

2015Executive Compensation Overview

27

Introduction

27

2021 Performance

27

Executive Summary

28

2021 Voting Results for Advisory Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation

   2630 

Aspects of Compensation Program Favorable from a Corporate Governance Perspective

27

Compensation Committee Process and General Considerations

28

Compensation Consultant

28

Compensation Consultant Independence

28

Comparative Peer Groups

29

Role of Our Executive Officers in Executive Compensation

30

Compensation Objectives and Policies

30

Components of Executive Compensation

   31 

Share OwnershipCompensation Committee Process and Retention GuidelinesGeneral Considerations

31

Compensation Consultant

32

Compensation Consultant Independence

32

Comparative Peer Group

33

Role of Our Executive Officers in Executive Compensation

34

Compensation Objectives and Policies

34

Components of Executive Compensation

   35 


Base Salary

35

Recoupment PolicyCash Incentive Compensation

   36 

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging PolicyCorporate Performance Factors

   36 

Severance Payments2021 Annual Incentive Opportunity Awards

   36 

Share Trading RestrictionsCorporate Performance Factors and 2021 Performance

36

Long-Term Incentive Awards

   37 

Non-Qualified Retirement PlansPerformance Share Units

37

Deferred Compensation

37

No Perquisites

   38 

Benefits Generally Available to EmployeesRestricted Share Units

   38 

Accounting and Tax ConsiderationsRestricted Share Units with Outperformance Units (Mr. Coradino)

38

Compensation Committee Report

   39 

2015 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION2019 - 2021 RSU Payouts

39

2019 - 2021 Outperformance Unit Payouts

   40 

2015 Summary Compensation TableOther

   40 

Employment AgreementsShare Ownership and Retention Guidelines

41

Recoupment Policy

41

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

41

Severance Payments

41

Share Trading Restrictions

   42 

Non-Qualified Retirement Plans

42

2015 GrantsTiming of Plan-Based AwardsEquity Grants

42

Deferred Compensation

42

No Perquisites

42

Benefits Generally Available to Employees

43

Accounting and Tax Considerations

43

2021 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   44 

Performance Based Programs2021 Summary Compensation Table

44

Employment Agreements

45

Joseph F. Coradino

45

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

45

Joseph J. Aristone

45

Heather Crowell

   46 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year EndAndrew M. Ioannou

   4746 

2015 Option Exercises and Stock VestedLisa M. Most

46

Named Executive Officers Generally

46

Termination or Change of Control Arrangements

46

Termination by Us Without Cause, Termination by a Senior Executive for Good Reason or Our Election Not to Renew the Employment Agreement Not Associated with a Change in Control

46

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    i



PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

200 South Broad Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

www.preit.com

 

PROXY STATEMENTii    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


LOGO

VOTING INFORMATION

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (“PREIT” or the “Company”), will be heldconducted via live webcast on Thursday, June 2, 20162022 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time at the Union League, 140 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102. We are mailing this(the “Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statement is being mailed or made available on or about April 20, 201622, 2022 to both (i) each holder of PREIT’s issued and outstanding common shares of beneficial interest and (ii) each holder of PREIT’s Outstanding Preferred Shares (defined below) entitled to vote at the meeting in order to furnish information relating to the business to be transacted at the meeting. We are mailing or making available our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152021 (the “Annual Report”) together with this Proxy Statement. We have included theThe Annual Report is being provided for informational purposes and not as a means of soliciting your proxy.

Record Date; Shareholders Entitled to Vote

We have fixed the close of business on April 4, 201611, 2022 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Meeting (the “Record Date”).

Common Shareholders

All holders of record of PREIT’s common shares of beneficial interest at that timeas of the Record Date are entitled to notice of and are entitled to vote on the proposals submitted to the holders of common shares of beneficial interest at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. On the record date, 69,458,947Record Date, 80,616,801 common shares of beneficial interest were outstanding.

Preferred Shareholders

All holders of record of PREIT’s 7.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series B Preferred”), the 7.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series C Preferred”), and the Trust’s 6.875% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares (the “Series D Preferred,” and, together with the Series B Preferred and the Series C Preferred, the “Outstanding Preferred Shares”), as of the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote together as a single class on the proposal submitted to the holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. On the Record Date, 3,450,000 Series B Preferred, 6,900,000 Series C Preferred, and 5,000,000 Series D Preferred, were outstanding, for an aggregate total of 15,350,000 Outstanding Preferred Shares.

For holders of both PREIT’s common shares of beneficial interest and Outstanding Preferred Shares, you will receive two proxy cards, a proxy card for the common shares of beneficial interest, and a proxy card for the Outstanding Preferred Shares with respect to the Preferred Trustee Election Proposal (as defined below). If you are a holder of the Outstanding Preferred Shares and wish to vote for the Preferred Trustee Election Proposal, you will need to properly complete and return the proxy card with respect to the Preferred Trustee Election Proposal, or follow the voting instructions provided by your broker nominee, as applicable.

Your Participation in Voting the Shares You Own Is Important

Voting your shares is important to ensure that you have a say in the governance of PREIT and to fulfill the objectives of the majority voting standard that we apply in the election of trustees. If you are receiving this Proxy Statement from a broker, bank or other financial institution, please review the proxy materials and follow the instructions on the voting instruction form to communicate your voting instructions to your broker, bank or other financial institution. We hopeencourage you willto exercise your rights and fully participate as a shareholder of PREIT.

How to Vote

We hope you will attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or notMeeting, which will be conducted via live webcast. Regardless of whether you expect to attend the virtual meeting, in person, please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying envelope so thatyou may vote your shares will be represented. The envelope is addressed to our transfer agent and requires no postage. You may also vote your sharesby mail, by telephone or through the internet by following the instructions set forth onin the proxy card.Notice. If you receive more than one proxy cardNotice because you have multiple accounts, you should sign and return all proxy cards received, or submit your voting instructions with respect to each account by mail, telephone or through the internet, so that all of your shares will be voted.voted at the Annual Meeting.

Shareholders of record on the Record Date may vote by:

(i)

internet by visiting the website specified in the Notice,

(ii)

telephone using the instructions provided in the Notice, or

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    1


  VOTING INFORMATION  

(iii)

mail by marking, executing and returning the proxy card (located at the website specified in the Notice) in accordance with the instructions thereon.

Shareholders who hold their shares in “street name” through a bank, broker or other holder of record (a “nominee”) must vote their shares in the manner prescribed by their nominee.

Shares Held through a Broker, Bank or Other Financial Institution

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other financial institution, there is a New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rule that determines the manner in which your vote in the election of trustees will be handled at our upcoming 2016the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Meeting. Your broker, bank or other financial institution is not permitted to vote on your behalf on the election of trustees or the proposal related to our executive compensation (i.e., Proposals One and Two described in this Proxy Statement) unless you provide specific instructions by completing and returning the voting instruction form or by following the voting instructions provided to you to vote your shares

via telephone or the internet. For your vote with respect to the election of trusteesthose proposals to be counted, you need to communicate your voting instructions to your broker, bank or other financial institution before the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting, of Shareholders, and before any earlier date specified in the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other financial institution.

Quorum; Voting Standards Generally

At this year’s Annual Meeting, there are two sets of proposals: one set of proposals that will be voted on by common shareholders, and a proposal that will be voted on by holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares. Holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares are not entitled to vote on the proposals to be voted on by common shareholders, and common shareholders are not entitled to vote on the proposal to be voted on by Outstanding Preferred Shares. Holders of both common shares and Outstanding Preferred Shares are entitled to vote on all proposals.

Proposals to be Voted on by Common Shareholders

In order to conduct the business of the Annual Meeting, a majority of the common shares entitled to vote must be present at the meeting, either live at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy, to constitute a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you attend and vote during the Annual Meeting online or if you properly complete and return a proxy card or follow the voting instructions provided by your broker nominee, as applicable.

On each matter subject to a vote of the holders of common shares at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, each holder of common shares will be entitled to one vote per share.

The following table summarizes the vote required for approval of each proposal submitted to the holders of common shares and the effect on the outcome of the vote of abstentions, uninstructed shares held by brokers (which result in “broker non-votes” when a beneficial owner of shares held in street name does not provide voting instructions and, as a result, under NYSE rules, the institution that holds the shares may not vote those shares on certain proposals) and signed but unmarked proxy cards.

Proposal

Votes Required

for Approval

Effect of
Withhold
Votes/
Abstentions(1)
Uninstructed
Shares/Effect
of Broker
Non-Votes(1)
Signed but
Unmarked Proxy
Cards(2)

 Proposal One

Election of Trustees

Seven nominees receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes(3)

No effect(3)

Not voted/
no effect

Vote “for”

 Proposal Two

Advisory, Non-Binding Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation

Majority of votes cast

No effect

Not voted/
no effect

Vote “for”

 Proposal Three

Ratification of Selection of BDO USA LLP as Independent Auditor

Majority of votes cast

No effect

Discretionary
vote by
nominee

Vote “for”

(1)

Abstentions, withholds and broker non-votes are included in determining whether a quorum is present. Under Section 11.F of PREIT’s trust agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered “votes cast.”

2    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  VOTING INFORMATION  

(2)

If you complete your proxy properly, whether by completing and returning a proxy card or by submitting your instructions by telephone or through the internet, but do not provide instructions as to how to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as shown in this column and in accordance with the judgment of the individuals named as proxies on the proxy card as to any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

(3)

Subject to the majority voting provisions of our corporate governance guidelines, which are described in this Proxy Statement, the seven nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast at the meeting will be elected as trustees.

Preferred Trustee Election Proposal

The holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares are currently entitled to vote and fill the two additional trustee positions created on PREIT’s Board of Trustees (the “Board of Trustees” or the “Board”) by virtue of the terms of the designating amendments to the Company’s trust agreement designating the rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the Outstanding Preferred Shares (the “Designating Amendments”). We refer to this proposal as the “Preferred Trustee Election Proposal”. With respect to the election of trustees (Proposal One), assuming a quorum is present, and subject to the majority voting provisions of our corporate governance guidelines, which are described in this Proxy Statement, the nine nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast at the meeting will be elected as trustees. With respect to the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement and the accompanying tabular and narrative disclosure (Proposal Two) and the vote on ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor for 2016 (Proposal Three), assuming a quorum is present, in each case the proposal will be approved ifPreferred Trustee Election Proposal, a majority of the sharesOutstanding Preferred Shares entitled to vote as a single class must be present in personat the meeting, either live at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy, and being castto constitute a quorum. Each holder of Outstanding Preferred Shares will be entitled to one vote per share with respect to the Preferred Trustee Election Proposal.

The two nominees receiving the most votes will be elected. Holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares may vote FOR any nominee or WITHHOLD from any nominee. Votes that are withheld will not be included in the vote tally for the election of these trustees. Brokerage firms do not have authority to vote customers’ unvoted shares held by the firms in street name for the election of trustees. As a result, any shares not voted by a customer will be treated as a votebroker non-vote. Such broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal are voted “FOR” the proposal. Proposal Two is non-binding. If you mark yourresults of this vote. Signed but unmarked proxy as “Withhold Authority” or “Abstain” on any matter, or if you give specific instructions that no vote be cast on any specific matter, the shares represented by your proxycards will not be voted on that matter, but will count toward the establishment of a quorum. Proxies submitted by brokers that do not indicate a vote for some or all of the proposals because they do not have discretionary voting authority and have not received instructions as to how to vote on those proposals (so called “broker non-votes”) are also considered in determining whether a quorum is present, but generally will not affect the outcome of any vote.this proposal.

Voting by Proxy; Revocation of Proxies

You may vote your shares to be voted at the Annual Meeting in personby following the instructions available on the meeting website during the meeting or by proxy. You can always change your vote at the meeting; therefore, we recommend that you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the virtual meeting. All valid proxies received before the Annual Meeting will be voted according to their terms. If you complete your proxy properly, whether by completing and returning a proxy card or by submitting your instructions by telephone or through the internet, but do not provide instructions as to how to vote your shares, your proxy will be voted “FOR” the election of all trustees nominated by our Board of Trustees, “FOR” advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement and the accompanying tabular and narrative disclosure, and “FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxies. After providing your proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by filing an instrument revoking it with our secretarySecretary or by submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. You also may revoke your proxy by virtually attending the Annual Meeting and giving notice of revocation.voting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting, by itself, will not constitute revocation of a proxy.

Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address

Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders might be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of our Proxy Statement orand Annual Report might have been sent to multiple shareholders in your household.household if you have elected to receive paper copies. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to you if you request oneone. If you are a shareholder of record, make your request by writing or by calling us as follows: Investor Relations, Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, The Bellevue, 200 South BroadOne Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102;19103; Telephone: 215-875-0735. If you are a beneficial owner, requests can be made by contacting Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. by calling 1-866-540-7095 or in writing at 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717, Attention: Householding Department. If you want to receive separate copies of the Annual Report and Proxy Statement in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household in the future, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee record holder.

Solicitation of Proxies

We will bear the cost of preparing and soliciting proxies, including the reasonable charges and expenses of brokerage firms or other nominees for forwarding proxy materials to shareholders. In addition, to solicitation by mail, certain trustees, officers and employees of PREIT and its subsidiaries may solicit proxies personally or by telephone or other electronic means without extra compensation, with the exception of reimbursement for actual expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation. We have also hired Alliance Advisors LLC to assist us in the solicitation of votes for a fee of $3,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, for these services. The enclosed proxy being solicited in connection with this Proxy Statement is being solicited by and on behalf of ourthe Board of Trustees.

GOVERNANCE

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    3


  VOTING INFORMATION  

Instructions for Participation in the Virtual Annual Meeting

There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting which will be held via live audio webcast rather than in-person. The virtual meeting will offer our shareholders the same rights and opportunities as an in-person meeting, allowing for active participation at no cost, regardless of geographic location.

To participate in the virtual meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PEI2022 and log in by entering the unique 16-digit control number included on your Notice, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You may log into the Annual Meeting beginning at 10:45 a.m., Eastern Time, on June 2, 2022 and the meeting will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Firefox, Chrome, and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure that they have a strong WiFi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Participants should also give themselves plenty of time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the meeting.

Asking Questions at the Virtual Annual Meeting

If you wish to submit a question, you may do so during the meeting by logging into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PEI2022 and following the instructions on the website. As part of the Annual Meeting, we will hold a live question and answer session, during which we intend to answer questions submitted during the meeting which are pertinent to the Company and the meeting matters, as time permits. Rules of Conduct for the Annual Meeting will be available on the virtual meeting platform on the day of the meeting. Examples of questions that are not pertinent are questions related to general economic, political or other views that are not directly related to the business of the Annual Meeting.

Technical Difficulties or Trouble Accessing the Live Webcast

If you experience any technical difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting or during the meeting, please call the toll-free number that will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PEI2022 for assistance. We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have beginning 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting, at 10:45 a.m., Eastern Time, on June 2, 2022.

4    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


LOGO

GOVERNANCE

PROPOSAL TO BE VOTED ON BY COMMON SHAREHOLDERS—PROPOSAL ONE—Election of Trustees by Common Shareholders

ELECTION OF TRUSTEES

Trustee Nomination Process

PREIT’s trust agreement provides that nominations for election to the office of trustee at any annual meeting of shareholders are made by the Board of Trustees, or by a common shareholder if such shareholder provides a notice in writing delivered to our secretarySecretary not less than 90 nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the prior year’s meeting, and for an election at an annual meeting that is not within 30 days of such anniversary date, or for a special meeting called for the election of trustees, not later than 10 days following the date on which notice of the date of the meeting is mailed or disclosed publicly, whichever comes first. The notice must be signed by the holders of at least two percent of the common shares outstanding on the date of the notice. Shareholders making nominations of trustee candidates must provide in the notice, among other things, (a) information regarding share ownership and any hedging or other transaction to hedge the economic risk or to increase or decrease the voting power of such shareholder, (b) a description of all agreements or understandings between any such shareholder and each nominee and any other person, pursuant to which any such shareholder has a right to vote any shares, or pursuant to which the nominee or shareholder may be entitled to compensation, reimbursement of expenses or indemnification by reason of such nomination or service as a trustee, including all such information that would be required to be disclosed under federal securities regulations if the nominee were nominated by the Board of Trustees, and (c) such other information regarding each nominee as would be required in a proxy statement had the nominee been nominated by the Board of Trustees. The complete text of these requirements is provided in Section 11.J of PREIT’s trust agreement, which is available on our website at www.preit.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, and a copy of which may be obtained by written request to our secretarySecretary at our principal executive office. Nominations not made in accordance with the trust agreement procedures will not be considered, unless the number of persons properly nominated is fewer than the number of persons to be elected to the office of trustee at the Annual Meeting. In this latter event, nominations for the trustee positions that would not otherwise be filled may be made at the Annual Meeting by any person entitled to vote in the election of trustees.

Nominees for Trustee

PREIT’s

The Board of Trustees has nominated George J. Alburger, Jr., Joseph F. Coradino, M. Walter D’Alessio, Michael J. DeMarco, Rosemarie B. Greco, Leonard I. Korman,JoAnne A. Epps, Mark E. Pasquerilla, Charles P. Pizzi and John J. Roberts and Ronald Rubin for electionre-election at the Annual Meeting as trustees to serve until the Annual Meeting to be held in the spring of 20172023 and until their respective successors have beenare duly elected and have qualified. Each of these nominees for election by the nomineescommon shareholders is currently serving as a trustee whose term expires at the Annual Meeting.

If any of the foregoingthese nominees becomes unable to or declines to serve, the persons named in the accompanying proxy have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute or substitutes, unless the Board of Trustees reduces the number of trustees to be elected.

The following table presents information with respect to the nine nomineesaddress for each nominee for the office of trustee and PREIT’s executive officers, including their ages, principal occupations and the number of common shares beneficially owned by each of them as of March 31, 2016. As of such date, none of the nominees for the office of trustee or PREIT’s executive officers owned any shares of either series of PREIT’s preferred shares. is c/o PREIT, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

In selecting nominees for election to the Board of Trustees, the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Trustees consider a number of factors that they deem relevant to service on the Board, including (1) including:

core competencies and willingness to participate actively in the work of the Board of Trustees and, in the case of non-management nominees, in the standing Committeescommittees of the Board of Trustees, (2) Trustees;

personal integrity and ethics, (3) ethics;

experience and maturity of judgment, (4) judgment;

potential contributions to the collective knowledge,

experience and capabilities of the Board of Trustees, (5) Trustees;

diversity of personal and professional backgrounds,backgrounds; and (6) 

the ability to work constructively and effectively with other members of the Board of Trustees.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    5


  GOVERNANCE  

The chart below highlights several categories of skills and areas of expertise of our current trustees, each of whom has been nominated for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Generally, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Trustees consider it important that nominees have competencies in one or more of the following areas: the real estate industry, public or corporate finance, management, retail, accounting or government.these areas. Each nominee brings his or hera particular set of personal experiences and competencies to the Board of Trustees, which, were considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee andtaken as a whole, enables the Board of Trustees to provide effective leadership to the Company in order to achieve our goals and which are briefly highlighted in the table below.objectives.

The address for each nominee for the office of trustee and each executive officer is c/o PREIT, The Bellevue, Third Floor, 200 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102.

LOGO

 

Nominees for

The Nominating and Governance Committee and the OfficeBoard of TrusteeTrustees also value diverse backgrounds and lengths of tenure with the Company. This helps to ensure that the Board of Trustees strikes an appropriate balance of those with extensive experience with the Company and those who can bring new, fresh ideas to the Company.

   Common Shares Beneficially Owned  
on March 31, 2016(1)
Principal Occupation, Affiliations and QualificationsNumberPercent of
Class(2)

Joseph F. Coradino(3)

Age: 64

Trustee since: 2006

 

 

LOGO

566,794

(4)

 

6    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

uBoard of Trustees Nominees for the Office of Trustee

Information on individuals nominated by the Board of Trustees is provided below. Information about the nominees for election by the holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares is presented separately under “Outstanding Preferred Shares Proposal—Proposal to be Voted on by Only Preferred Shareholders—Outstanding Preferred Shares Trustees Election” beginning on page 59.

 

*

GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.

LOGO

Age: 74

Trustee since: 2017

Committees:

•   Audit (Chair)

•   Compensation

•   Transaction

Number of Public Company Boards (including PREIT): 2

Background

Mr. Alburger, 74, served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Liberty Property Trust from 1995 to 2016. He was previously an Executive Vice President of Liberty Property Trust from 2000 to 2016. Departing as Executive Vice President, Mr. Alburger worked for EBL&S Property Management, Inc. from 1982 to 1995, an owner and manager of approximately 200 shopping centers aggregating 30 million square feet of retail space. He was employed by Price Waterhouse, LLP from 1968 to 1982, finishing his career there as a Senior Manager. Mr. Alburger serves on the board of Americold Realty Trust (NYSE: COLD), an international owner and operator of temperature-controlled warehouses. He is a former member of the board of Exeter Property Group, a real estate investment management firm.

Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

By virtue of his service as a senior executive of a real estate investment trust, Mr. Alburger has extensive experience in substantially all aspects of real estate investment, development and ownership, including aspects of real estate finance, operations and management, as well as experience with real estate mergers and acquisitions. That experience, coupled with his experience at a global accounting firm, provides Mr. Alburger with an exceptionally high level of accounting and audit expertise that he brings to the Board, allowing him to interact effectively with the accounting and finance managers of PREIT and with PREIT’s independent auditors. Mr. Alburger also adds additional depth to the Board’s competencies in the areas of organizational development and strategic planning, as well as substantial experience regarding public companies and corporate governance.

JOSEPH F. CORADINO

LOGO

Age: 70

Trustee since: 2006

Committees:

•   Transaction

Number of Public Company Boards (including PREIT): 1

Background

Mr. Coradino, 70, has served as the Chief Executive Officer of PREIT since 2012.2012 and Chairman of PREIT since 2017. From 2001 to 2012, he was the President of PREIT Services, LLC and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. from 2004 to 2012., and the Executive Vice President-Retail of PREIT from 2001PREIT. Prior to 2012.and in conjunction with that service, Mr. Coradino was the Executive Vice President-Retail Division and Treasurer of PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. from 1998 to 2004. From 1997 to 1998, he served as the Senior Vice President-Retail Division and Treasurer, PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. PreviouslyMr. Coradino is a current trustee and member of the Executive Committee of Temple University and a trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), and he previously served as a director of A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc. from 2006 to 2011. TrusteeThe employment agreement between PREIT and Mr. Coradino provides that, during the term of Temple University. Trusteehis employment agreement, the Board of Trustees must nominate him as a candidate for election to the International CouncilBoard of Shopping Centers (ICSC).Trustees at each annual meeting at which his term as a trustee is scheduled to expire.

 

Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

Mr. Coradino has been engaged in real estate development, management and leasing for substantially all of his professional life and currently serves as PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer. Prior to becoming the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Coradino served for a number of years as the senior officer for PREIT’s retail operations and as the principal officer in charge of redevelopment projects. Prior to joining PREIT as a senior executive in 1997, Mr. Coradino was an executive of The Rubin Organization, which was acquired by PREIT in 1997. Mr. Coradino brings to the Board an extensive knowledge of the properties and leasing program of PREIT and of trends and developments in the retail industry that are of vital significance to PREIT.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    7


  GOVERNANCE  

Nominees for the Office of Trustee  Common Shares Beneficially Owned  
on March 31, 2016(1)
Principal Occupation, Affiliations and QualificationsNumberPercent of
Class(2)

M. Walter D’AlessioMICHAEL J. DEMARCO

Age: 82

LOGO

Age: 62

Trustee since: 2005; Lead Independent Trustee since January 2015

Committees:

•   Compensation (Chair)

•   Special

•   Transaction (Chair)

Number of Public Company Boards (including PREIT): 1 2011

 

Background

29,903(5)*

Since 2012, Principal of NorthMarq Advisors, a real estate advisory firm. Formerly Vice Chairman of NorthMarq Capital, a Minneapolis-based real estate investment banking firm with an office in Philadelphia, and Senior Managing Director of NorthMarq Advisors, since 2003. Non-executive Chairman of the Board of Brandywine Realty Trust (office and industrial real estate development and management), headquartered in Radnor, Pennsylvania, since 2004. Serves on the boards of directors of PECO Energy Company, a subsidiary of Exelon Corporation, Independence Blue Cross (Chairman) and the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce. From 1982 to 2003, served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Legg Mason Real Estate Services, Inc., a commercial mortgage, banking and pension fund advisory firm headquartered in Philadelphia.

Mr. D’Alessio has served in senior executive positions with private companies and quasi-governmental organizations inDeMarco, 62, was the real estate sector for substantially all of his professional life. By reason of this extensive experience, as well as his continuing service on the boards of public agencies, non-profit organizations and corporations, Mr. D’Alessio has gained an extraordinary degree of expertise in real estate valuation, finance and capital markets, corporate governance and executive compensation. In addition, Mr. D’Alessio’s active participation in governmental and community affairs enables him to provide valuable insights into matters of public policy and related considerations that affect the development of the properties of PREIT.

Michael J. DeMarco

Age: 56

3,732(6)*

President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation since 2015.from 2015 to 2020. Previously, he was the Chief Investment Officer of Cantor Commercial Real Estate Company, L.P. from 2013 to 2015.2015 and an Executive Vice President of Vornado Realty Trust from 2010 to 2013. Mr. DeMarco served as a Managing Director at Fortress Investment Group from 2007 to 2010.2010 and a Managing Director at Lehman Brothers from 1998 to 2007. SeniorMr. DeMarco also held senior positions at Credit Suisse First Boston and Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. DeMarco was initially nominated to the Board in 2015 in connection with an agreement between PREIT and certain shareholders, including Land & Buildings Investment Management LLC and Land & Buildings Capital Growth Fund, L.P. Mr. DeMarco was independent of both PREIT and such investors, and the Company was not obligated under the agreement to nominate him to the Board after the 2015 Annual Meeting.

 

Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

From his career in real estate investment banking and commercial finance, Mr. DeMarco has extensive experience in all aspects of real estate finance and operations and real estate mergers and acquisitions, and possesses a very deep knowledge and understanding of real estate capital markets, such as the CMBS market, as well as transactions and valuations. Mr. DeMarco’s substantial experience enables him to offer valuable insights into the financial environment in which the Company is operating. Further, Mr. DeMarco has extensive management experience, including his most recent position as the Chief Executive Officer of a real estate business. During 2020, Mr. DeMarco committed extensive time and expertise to PREIT through his leadership of the Special Finance Committee, providing crucial board oversight and strategic direction in connection with the Company’s financial restructuring.

Nominees for the Office of Trustee  Common Shares Beneficially Owned  
on March 31, 2016(1)
Principal Occupation, Affiliations and QualificationsNumberPercent of
Class(2)

Rosemarie B. GrecoJOANNE A. EPPS

Age: 69

LOGO

Age: 70

Trustee since: 2012 (and from 1997 to 2011) 2018

Committees:

•   Nominating and Governance (Chair)

•   Audit

•   Special

•   Transaction

Number of Public Company Boards (including PREIT): 2

 

Background

Ms. Epps, 70, is Senior Advisor to the President of Temple University, a position she has held since 2021. Ms. Epps was previously the Executive Vice President and Provost of Temple University from 2016 to 2021. She previously was the Dean of the Temple University Beasley School of Law from 2008 to 2016, and Associate Dean of Academic Affairs from 1989 to 2008. She has been a member of the faculty of Temple University Beasley School of Law since 1985 and a full professor since 1994. She is a member and former President of the Board of Directors of the Defenders Association of Philadelphia, and one of five members of Philadelphia’s Board of Ethics. She is a member of the Board of Directors of the ABA Retirement Funds, where she previously chaired the Governance and Compensation and Investment Committees. She is a member of the Board of Directors of the Philadelphia Equity Alliance. She is also a member of the Pennsylvania Women’s Forum. Previously, Ms. Epps was a member of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Women Lawyer’s Foundation, where she chaired the review of Board governance protocols, and she was a member of the Trinity College Board of Trustees, where she served on the Finance and Audit Committee. Ms. Epps serves on the board of directors of Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLPI), a company in the business of acquiring, financing and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators.

14,227Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

(7)*

Ms. Epps has a diverse combination of legal, business, operational, and community and governmental knowledge. Ms. Epps brings to the Board her many skills, including in the areas of corporate governance, finance and management, organizational development, strategic planning and crisis management.

8    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

Founding Principal, Grecoventures Ltd. (business investment and consulting partnership). Former Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Office of Health Care Reform. Former CEO and President, CoreStates Bank, N.A. and President, CoreStates Financial Corp. Director of Universal Display Corporation (LED display and lighting products) and PECO Energy Company, a subsidiary of Exelon Corporation. Member of the Board of Overseers of the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing. Former corporate director of Exelon Corporation, Sunoco, Inc., General Accident Insurance (USA), Cardone Industries, Inc., Genuardi’s Family Markets, Inc. and Radian, Inc.; former trustee of SEI I Mutual Funds; former Chair of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce; former President and CEO of the Philadelphia Private Industry Council; former member of the Philadelphia Planning Commission and Board of Education; and former Chair of the Pennsylvania Workforce Investment Board.MARK E. PASQUERILLA

 

By virtueLOGO

Age: 62

Trustee since: 2003

Committees:

•   Audit

•   Nominating and Governance

•   Transaction

Number of her experience as a senior officer in the banking industry, her senior policy-making role in government and her service as a director of several large public companies engaged in diverse businesses, Ms. Greco adds significant depth to the Board’s competencies in the areas of organizational development, corporate governance, executive compensation, strategic planning, finance and community and government affairs.Public Company Boards (including PREIT): 2

 

Leonard I. Korman

Age: 80

Trustee since: 1996

Background491,653(8)*

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Korman Commercial Properties, Inc. (real estate development and management). Partner of The Korman Company, trustee of Thomas Jefferson University and member of the Albert Einstein Health Care Network Board of Overseers. Former director of CoreStates Bank, N.A. Served on the Regional Advisory Board of First Union National Bank, and the boards of The Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts and the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia.

Mr. Korman has been engaged in the acquisition, disposition, financing and management of residential and commercial real estate (including shopping centers) asPasquerilla, 62, is an owner and senior executive for his entire adult life. In addition, he has served as a director of a large regional bank and on the boards of major community organizations. From this experience, Mr. Korman brings to the Board of Trustees an extensive knowledge of substantially all aspects of real estate investment, development and ownership, as well as valuable capabilities in strategic planning and finance.

Nominees for the Office of Trustee  Common Shares Beneficially Owned  
on March 31, 2016(1)
Principal Occupation, Affiliations and QualificationsNumberPercent of
Class(2)

Mark E. Pasquerilla(9)

Age: 56

Trustee since: 2003

126,003(10)*

Officerofficer and director of Pasquerilla Enterprises, LP and its subsidiaries (ownership and management of hospitality properties), a position he has held since 2006 (Chief Executive Officer since 2013, President from 2006 to 2013)., and sole member of Pasquerilla Management LLC. He has been a director of AmeriServ Financial, Inc., a publicly traded company (NASDAQ; ASRV), AmeriServ Financial Bank and AmeriServ Life Insurance Company since 1997. From 1992 to 2006, he served as an officer and director of Crown Holding Company and its subsidiaries (CEO(Chief Executive Officer and Chairman from April 1999 to December 2006 and President from 1992 to 2006). In July 2013,addition, Mr. Pasquerilla served as the Pasquerilla Enterprises LP consolidated group acquired Crown Holding Company and its subsidiaries. Chairman of the Board of Trustees, President and Chief Executive Officer of Crown American Realty Trust from 1999 to 2003.2003, Vice Chairman of Crown American Realty Trust from 1998 to 1999.1999, and Trustee of Crown American Realty Trust from 1993 to 2003. Director of AmeriServ Financial, Inc., AmeriServ Financial Bank and AmeriServ Life Insurance Company since 1997. BoardMr. Pasquerilla was a board member of Concurrent Technologies Corporation, a charitable organization, since 1990. Boardfrom 1990 to 2020 and served as Trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers from 2002 to 2005. In addition, he is currently a board member of the Community Foundation for the Alleghenies, a charitable organization, which he has served since 1991. AdvisoryMr. Pasquerilla has been an advisory board member of the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown since 1988. Board1988, is a current board member of Johnstown (Pennsylvania) Area Heritage Association;Association, President of the Greater Johnstown Regional Partnership;Partnership, and Trusteeboard member of the International Council of Shopping Centers from 2002 to 2005.Johnstown Redevelopment Authority.

 

Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

As the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Crown American Realty Trust at the time of its merger into PREIT in 2003, Mr. Pasquerilla brings to the Board a broad understanding of the retail real estate industryindustry. In accordance with the merger agreement between PREIT and knowledge of the properties acquired by PREIT from Crown American Realty Trust in 2003, PREIT expanded the size of its Board of Trustees and the communities that they serve.elected Mr. Pasquerilla, served aswho was a trusteemember of Crown’s board at the time of the International Council of Shopping Centers,merger, to fill a leading trade organization, and is currently a director of a publicly-owned bank and onvacancy created by the boards of several community organizations.expansion. Mr. Pasquerilla’s competencies are derived from his business experience and community service activities, and include a knowledge of real estate acquisitions, finance and management, private and public capital markets, organizational development and strategic planning.

Nominees for the Office of Trustee  Common Shares Beneficially Owned  
on March 31, 2016(1)
Principal Occupation, Affiliations and QualificationsNumberPercent of
Class(2)

CharlesCHARLES P. PizziPIZZI

Age: 65

LOGO

Age: 71

Trustee since: 2013

Committees:

•   Special (Chair)

•   Nominating and Governance

•   Compensation

•   Transaction

Number of Public Company Boards (including PREIT): 3

 

Background

12,481(11)*

FormerMr. Pizzi, 71, is the former President and Chief Executive Officer and director of Tasty Baking Company, a position he held from 2002 until the company’s sale in 2011. DirectorHe is a director of Brandywine Realty Trust (NYSE: BDN) (office and industrial real estate development and management), PHH Corporation (residential mortgage originator), Allied Security Holdings LLC (security officer services), and Mistras Group, Inc. (NYSE: MG) (provider of integrated technology-enabled asset protection solutions). He also serves as a director of Franklin Square Energy & Power Fund and Franklin Square Global Credit Opportunities Fund. Formeras Chairman of the Board of the privately-held Independence Health Group. Mr. Pizzi is also a trustee of AmeriHealth Caritas. From 2006 to 2011, Mr. Pizzi was a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, from 2006 to 2011, including service as Chairman from 2010 to 2011. FormerIn addition, he was a director of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange from 1997 until its acquisition by NASDAQ in 2008.2008 and was the President and Chief Executive officerOfficer of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce from 1989 to 2002. DirectorMr. Pizzi was also a director of privately-held PHH Corporation and Allied Security Holdings, LLC. In addition to the directorships noted above, Mr. Pizzi serves as a director of a variety of civic, educational, charitable and other boards, including the boards of Drexel University, Philadelphia Beltline Railroad, and Independence Blue Cross.the Board of Advisors of PNC Philadelphia. Mr. Pizzi was the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce from 1989 to 2002.

 

Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

Mr. Pizzi’s career is unusually extensive and varied, including nine years as president and chief executive officer of a public company, service as a director of companies engaged in real estate, health insurance, construction, engineering, investment and security operations, and a broad range of civic and community leadership and service. By reason of his experience, Mr. Pizzi brings to the Board a diverse combination of business, operational, public company, community and governmental knowledge and skills.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    9


  GOVERNANCE  

Nominees for the Office of Trustee  Common Shares Beneficially Owned  
on March 31, 2016(1)
Principal Occupation, Affiliations and QualificationsNumberPercent of
Class(2)

JohnJOHN J. RobertsROBERTS

Age: 71

LOGO

Age: 77

Trustee since: 2003

Committees:

•   Audit

•   Nominating and Governance

•   Transaction

Number of Public Company Boards(including PREIT): 2

 

Background

18,740(12)*

Mr. Roberts, 77, is the Former Global Managing Partner and member of the Leadership Team of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, completing a 35 year35-year career with the firm in 2002. Director,He is a director of Vonage Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: VN) (a global communications company). Mr. Roberts is a member of the American Institute of CPAs and is a former director of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. and Vonage Holdings Corp. Member of the American Institute of CPAs. Former director of, SICOR, Inc., Philadelphia First Corporation, Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce, Urban Affairs Partnership, and the University City Science Center. FormerIn addition, Mr. Roberts is a former member of the advisory boards of the Kellogg School of Northwestern University and the University of Southern California School of Accounting. FormerAccounting, and is a former trustee of Drexel University.

 

Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

By reason of his 35 yearover 35-year career in public accounting, which included service as a senior executive with a global accounting firm, and his service on the boards and audit committees of other public companies, Mr. Roberts brings an exceptionally high level of accounting and audit expertise to the Board and the Audit Committee. HisMr. Robert’s experience has enabled Mr. Robertshim to interact knowledgeably and effectively with PREIT’s independent auditors and with the accounting and finance managers of PREIT. In addition, his experience as an accounting executive and as a board member of businesses in diverse industries and nonprofit organizations has given Mr. Roberts additional capabilities, including strategic planning and corporate governance.

Nominees for the Office of Trustee  Common Shares Beneficially Owned  
on March 31, 2016(1)
Principal Occupation, Affiliations and QualificationsNumberPercent of
Class(2)

Ronald Rubin(3)(13)

Age: 84

Trustee since: 1997

1,227,822(14)1.7%

Executive Chairman of PREIT since 2012. Chairman of PREIT from 2001 to 2012. Chief Executive Officer of PREIT from 1997 to 2012. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Rubin Organization, Inc. (renamed PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. upon its acquisition by PREIT in 1997) from 1992 to 1997. Trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers. Past Chairman of the Center City District and past Chairman of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce. Director of PECO Energy Company, a subsidiary of Exelon Corporation. Director of the Kimmel Center, Inc., Past President of the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia. Co-Chairman of the National Museum of American Jewish History and served on the boards of the Franklin Institute, the Philadelphia Orchestra and the United Jewish Appeal.

Mr. Rubin has been engaged in real estate ownership, development and management for his entire adult life and is widely recognized as a leader in the industry. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer of PREIT in 1997, Mr. Rubin was Chief Executive Officer of The Rubin Organization, which was acquired by PREIT in 1997. PREIT acquired The Rubin Organization, in significant part, to secure the leadership and extensive real estate industry knowledge, experience and relationships of Mr. Rubin and the team of executives that he had assembled. Mr. Rubin brings to the Board of Trustees extensive business experience, effective leadership and a vast knowledge of PREIT, its properties and the real estate industry.

Shares Beneficially Owned
On March 31, 2016(1)

Executive Officers

NumberPercent of
Class(2)

Jonathen Bell

Age: 48

43,774(15)*
Senior Vice President of PREIT since 2007. Chief Accounting Officer of PREIT since 2006. Vice President—Financial Services of PREIT from 1999 to 2007. From 2003 to 2006, Corporate Controller of PREIT. From 1997 to 1999, Controller of Washington REIT in Rockville, Maryland.

Bruce Goldman

Age: 57

141,661(16)*
Executive Vice President and General Counsel of PREIT since 2002. Secretary of PREIT since 2005. From 2001 to 2002, Senior Vice President—General Counsel of PREIT. From 2000 to 2001, Senior Vice President-Legal of PREIT. From 1997 to 2000, Vice President of New City Development, the development subsidiary of Mirage Resorts, Inc.

Andrew M. Ioannou

Age: 41

56,156(17)*
Executive Vice President—Finance and Acquisitions of PREIT since 2015. Treasurer of PREIT and PREIT Services, LLC since 2010. Senior Vice President—Capital Markets of PREIT from 2010 to 2015. Vice President—Capital Markets of PREIT Services, LLC and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. from 2005 to 2010.

Robert F. McCadden

Age: 58

322,151(18)*
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PREIT since 2004. From 2002 to 2004, Partner of KPMG LLP. From 1993 to 2002, Partner of Arthur Andersen LLP. Director of Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (multifamily real estate investment) since 2011 and Trustee of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (health care real estate investment) since 2013.

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

Age: 49

56,219(19)*
Executive Vice President—Operations of PREIT Services, LLC since 2015. Senior Vice President—Asset Management from 2005 to 2015. Vice President—Retail Asset Management from 2000 to 2005.

All Trustees and executive officers as a group (14 persons)

3,111,316(20)4.4

 

*Less than one percent.

 

(1)Unless otherwise indicated in the following footnotes, each trustee and executive officer has sole voting and investment power with respect to all such shares.

10    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

 

(2)Based on 69,458,947 common shares of beneficial interest outstanding as of March 31, 2016.

(3)The employment agreements between PREIT and each of Joseph F. Coradino and Ronald Rubin provide that, during the term of their respective employment agreements, the Board of Trustees shall nominate Joseph F. Coradino and Ronald Rubin, respectively, as a candidate for election to the Board of Trustees at each annual meeting at which his term as a trustee is scheduled to expire.

(4)Includes 347,196 shares that Mr. Coradino owns directly, 60,000 shares owned by Mr. Coradino’s spouse, 50,000 shares held by a trust of which Mr. Coradino is the trustee and beneficiary, 70,472 Class A units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. that Mr. Coradino owns directly, and 39,126 Class A units held by a trust of which Mr. Coradino’s spouse is a trustee and his child is a beneficiary. Class A units are redeemable for cash or, at PREIT’s option, for a like number of common shares. Mr. Coradino disclaims beneficial ownership of the Class A units held by or for the benefit of his spouse and child.

(5)Mr. D’Alessio directly owns all 29,903 shares.

(6)Mr. DeMarco directly owns all 3,732 shares.

(7)Includes 10,477 shares that Ms. Greco owns directly and 3,750 shares subject to exercisable options.

(8)Includes 341,234 shares that Mr. Korman owns directly, 420 shares owned by Mr. Korman’s spouse, 116,531 shares held in trusts of which Mr. Korman is a co-trustee, 10,528 shares held in trusts of which Mr. Korman is a co-trustee and the sole beneficiary, and 22,940 shares held by a family foundation. Mr. Korman disclaims beneficial ownership of the 116,531 shares held in trusts of which Mr. Korman is a co-trustee, the 420 shares owned by Mr. Korman’s spouse and the 22,940 shares held by the foundation.

(9)In accordance with the merger agreement between PREIT and Crown American Realty Trust in 2003, PREIT expanded the size of its Board of Trustees and elected Mr. Pasquerilla, who was a member of Crown’s board at the time of the merger, to fill a vacancy created by the expansion.

(10)Includes 28,878 shares that Mr. Pasquerilla owns directly, 45,211 shares held by Marenrico Partnership, and 51,914 shares held by Pasquerilla Enterprises, LP, an entity controlled by Mr. Pasquerilla. All of the shares held by Pasquerilla Enterprises, LP are pledged as collateral to First Commonwealth Bank, 33,575 shares held by Marenrico Partnership are pledged as collateral to Merrill Lynch with respect to a margin account, and 24,315 shares held by Mr. Pasquerilla directly are in a pledged account with Merrill Lynch.

(11)Includes 8,731 shares that Mr. Pizzi owns directly and 3,750 shares subject to exercisable options.

(12)Mr. Roberts directly owns all 18,740 shares.

(13)In accordance with an agreement that PREIT entered into in connection with its 1997 acquisition of The Rubin Organization, Inc., the Board of Trustees of PREIT elected Ronald Rubin as a trustee of PREIT in 1997 to fill a vacancy created by the resignation of a former trustee.

(14)Includes 148,860 shares that Ronald Rubin owns directly, 27,800 shares held by the Non-QTIP Marital Trust under the Will of Richard I. Rubin, of which Ronald Rubin is a beneficiary (the “Marital Trust”), 5,000 shares held by a trust of which Ronald Rubin is a trustee and beneficiary, 8,584 shares held by trusts of which Ronald Rubin is a trustee, and 1,037,578 Class A units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. that are redeemable for cash or, at PREIT’s option, for a like number of common shares, 86,934 of which are held by the Marital Trust and 5,227 of which are held by Pan American Office Investments, L.P. Ronald Rubin controls and holds substantial ownership interests in Pan American Office Investments, L.P.

(15)Mr. Bell directly owns all 43,774 shares.

(16)Mr. Goldman directly owns all 141,661 shares.

(17)Mr. Ioannou directly owns 16,328 shares and shares voting and investment power as to an additional 39,828 shares with his spouse.

(18)Mr. McCadden directly owns 303,507 shares and shares voting and investment power as to an additional 18,644 shares with his spouse.

(19)Mr. Ventresca directly owns 31,736 shares and shares voting and investment power as to an additional 24,483 shares with his spouse.

(20)Includes 1,956,640 shares held directly or indirectly, 7,500 shares subject to exercisable options and an aggregate of 1,147,176 Class A units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. that are redeemable for cash or, at PREIT’s option, for a like number of common shares.

Majority Voting Standard for Trustee Elections and Board Procedures

With respect to the election of trustees by common shareholders, assuming a quorum is present, and subject to the majority voting provisions of our corporate governance guidelines described below, the nineseven nominees nominated by the Board of Trustees receiving the highest number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be elected trustees. If you mark your proxy as “Withhold Authority”“Withhold” in the election of any of the trustees, or if you give specific instructions that no vote be cast in the election of any of the trustees, the shares represented by your proxy will not be voted in the election of such trustee(s), but will count toward the establishment of a quorum.

Pursuant to PREIT’s corporate governance guidelines, in an uncontested election, if any Board of Trustees nominated nominee for trustee receives a greater number of “Withhold Authority”“Withhold” responses regarding his or her election than votes “FOR”“For” his or her election, that nominee will be required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Trustees following certification of the shareholder vote. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Trustees (excluding such nominee) will consider the resignation offer and recommend to the Board of Trustees whether or not to accept it. The Board of Trustees (excluding such nominee) will act on the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. Thereafter, the Board of Trustees will promptly disclose its decision as to whether to accept the trustee’s resignation offer (and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer) in a press release to be disseminated in the manner that PREIT’s press releases typically are distributed or by other means of public disclosure.

Any trustee tendering his or her resignation pursuant to the procedures described above will not participate in the Nominating and Governance Committee recommendation or any other action of the Board of Trustees regarding whether to accept the resignation. If each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee were to receivereceives a majority of votes marked “Withhold Authority”“Withhold” in the same election, then the independent members of ourthe Board of Trustees who did not receive a majority of votes marked “Withhold Authority” would“Withhold” will appoint a committee among themselves (which may consist of some or all of them) to consider the resignations and recommend to the Board of Trustees whether to accept them.

Thereafter, the Board of Trustees will promptly disclose its decision (and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer) in a press release or by other means of public disclosure.

Board Recommendation

Our Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders of common shares of beneficial interest vote FOR the election of each of the individualsMr. Alburger, Mr. Coradino, Mr. DeMarco, Ms. Epps, Mr. Pasquerilla, Mr. Pizzi and Mr. Roberts, each of whom is named in this Proxy Statement and nominated for election as trustees by our Board of Trustees.

Signed proxies will be voted FOR each of these seven nominees unless a shareholder gives other instructions on the proxy card.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    11


  GOVERNANCE  

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERSCorporate Governance and Board Matters

Leadership Structure

In June 2012, Joseph F. Coradino became Chief Executive Officer of PREIT succeeding Ronald Rubin, who retired as Chief Executive Officer but remains as Executive Chairman. Ronald Rubin had been Chief Executive Officer since 1997 and in February 2017 he became Chairman since 2001.of PREIT. Mr. Coradino hadhas been a senior officer of PREIT since he joined the Company in 1997 and has been a Trusteetrustee of the Company since 2006. The Board of Trustees believes that promoting Mr. Coradino to the role of Chief Executive Officer, while retaining the knowledge and experience of Mr. Rubin as Executive Chairman, facilitated a smooth transition of leadership from Mr. Rubin to Mr. Coradino.

On January 4, 2016, pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement between the Company and Ronald Rubin, the Company provided notice of non-renewal of Mr. Rubin’s employment agreement, and consequently, the term of his employment agreement as Executive Chairman will expire on June 7, 2016. While the transition of leadership to Mr. Coradino is now complete, Mr. Rubin will continue to serveMichael J. DeMarco has served as the non-executive Chairman of the Company’s board of trustees and the Company will continue to benefit from his knowledge and expertise.

The Board of Trustees also previously appointed M. Walter D’Alessio to a fifth one-year term as Lead Independent Trustee that commenced atsince the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company and extends to the 20162021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company. The scopeBoard of Mr. D’Alessio’sTrustees has re-appointed Michael J. DeMarco to another one year term as Lead Independent Trustee through the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company. The Lead Independent Trustee’s responsibilities in this role includesinclude board operations, Chief Executive Officer evaluation and succession, Board of Trustees evaluation and recruitment, and, as appropriate, shareholder relations.

The Board believes that this structure, including a Lead Independent Trustee, Chairman and CEO, is appropriate and effective for PREIT because it provides (i) provides a separate conduit through the Lead Independent Trustee between the independent trustees and the CEOChief Executive Officer and other executive officers of PREIT, as appropriate, (ii) provides an additionala mechanism for oversight by the independent trustees, and (iii) provides a means of enhancing conditions for engagement by the Board in PREIT’s decision-making processes. The Board currently includes seven non-employee trustees (and upon the change in Ronald Rubin’s status, will include eightsix non-employee trustees)trustees who, by virtue of their collective leadership experience and their positions on the various committees of the Board discussed below, provide significant independent leadership and direction that complements the leadership provided by the Lead Independent Trustee Ronald Rubin and JosephMr. Coradino.

Meetings of Independent Trustees

In addition to PREIT’s Board and committee meetings, the independent members of the Board of Trustees meet separately at regularly scheduled meetings. The Lead Independent Trustee presides over these meetings.

Role in Risk Oversight

The full Board is responsible for, and is actively involved in, identifying and overseeing the management of the risks that PREIT faces. The Board retains direct decision makingdecision-making authority regarding the most significant of these risks, and exercises its oversight of management with respect to other risks. With respect to the exercise of direct decision making, the Board generally manages these risks through (i) the allocation of specific duties and responsibilities to its committees and the interaction of those committees, in performing the duties and responsibilities allocated to them, and (ii) with the engagement of various outside consultants, including our independent auditor and our compensation consultant. The Board typically performs its oversight function through review of reports from the Chairs of these committees, as well as through regular discussions and reports from management regarding any significant or developing risks. Among other relevant information, the Board receives a report annually from management describing management’s methodology for identifying, assessing, mitigating, monitoring and disclosing operational and other risks, including information technology and cyber security risks. In addition, at mostthe Board meetings anddiscusses with management, at least quarterly, management distributes and discusses with the Board an annotated list of the risks identified and discussed in the most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K of PREIT, identifying the primary person or group within the Company responsible for overseeing and addressing each risk, any changes to the intensitykey risk factors identified in the annual report. This annual assessment and the related ongoing discussions are designed to (i) keep the Company’s risk profile current, (ii) provide ongoing assessment of eachrisks and improvement to our risk management capabilities, (iii) make sure that the Board and any observed trends, even ifexecutive management are in alignment with respect to the overall intensityCompany’s appetite for risk, (iv) ensure that the Company’s risk culture encourages the right type of behaviors, and (v) integrate risk management with the appropriate management processes.

Throughout 2021, the Board exercised continuous oversight of the risk remains unchanged. Company’s strategy and response to operational and strategic challenges, most notably in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and addressing the Company’s financing and capital resources, receiving frequent updates from management on a variety of financial, health and safety, and human capital management matters, and providing related strategic guidance. These updates and regular discussions provided the Board with opportunities to evaluate the risks and opportunities presented, to effectively exercise its oversight function and to provide leadership, guidance and support to management during unprecedented times.

The Board believes that the leadership structure discussed above, which places significant authority in the hands of its independent trustees while involving employee trusteesthe Chief Executive Officer in Board decision-making, enhances its ability to identify and oversee the risks that PREIT faces.

12    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

Committees of the Board

PREIT has a standing Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), a standing Audit Committee, a standing Nominating and Governance Committee and, a standing Special Committee under PREIT’s Related Party Transactions Policy. Policy, a standing Special Committee. In addition, a Transaction Committee was in place beginning in April 2021 through its dissolution in September 2021, which committee provided advice to management with respect to consideration of strategic options and process. The composition and duties of each committee are outlined in the table below.

Committee

MembersPrincipal Duties

Compensation Committee

Number of Meetings in 2021: 14

Michael J. DeMarco (Chair)

George J. Alburger, Jr.

Charles P. Pizzi

•  Set the annual, long term and incentive compensation of PREIT’s executive officers in light of existing agreements and consistent with compensation objectives and policies established by the Compensation Committee

•  Make recommendations to the Board of Trustees regarding equity-based plans and administer these plans

Audit Committee

Number of Meetings in 2021: 7

George J. Alburger, Jr. (Chair)

John J. Roberts

Mark E. Pasquerilla

JoAnne A. Epps

•  Oversee PREIT’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the audit of PREIT’s financial statements

•  Select and retain independent auditors

•  Review with management and the independent auditors PREIT’s annual financial statements and related notes, and internal audit activities

•  Review with the independent auditors the planned scope and results of the annual audit and their reports and recommendations and matters relating to PREIT’s system of internal controls

•  Oversee PREIT’s information security function regarding cybersecurity risks and PREIT’s efforts to mitigate such risks

Nominating and Governance Committee

Number of Meetings in 2021: 6

JoAnne A. Epps (Chair)

Charles P. Pizzi

Mark E. Pasquerilla

John J. Roberts

•  Identify individuals qualified to become trustees of PREIT

•  Recommend trustee nominees and trustee committee appointments to the Board of Trustees

•  Review annually the compensation paid to non-employee trustees

•  Develop and recommend a set of governance principles applicable to PREIT

•  Annually review PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer succession planning

•  Oversee the evaluation of the performance of the Board of Trustees and management with respect to matters other than compensation

•  Oversee the work of our management sustainability committee that is charged with leading our environmental, social and governance efforts

Special Committee

Number of Meetings in 2021: 1

Charles P. Pizzi (Chair)

Michael J. DeMarco

JoAnne A. Epps

•  Administer PREIT’s Related Party Transactions Policy

•  See “Other Matters—Related Party Transactions Policy”

Transaction Committee

Number of Meetings in 2021: 2(1)

Michael J. DeMarco (Chair)

JoAnne Epps

Charles Pizzi

George J. Alburger, Jr.

Joseph F. Coradino

•  Provide advice to management with respect to consideration of strategic options and process

•  Committee operated from April 2021 through September 2021, at which time it was determined that the Board of Trustees as a whole would exercise this oversight and the committee was dissolved

(1)

While the Transaction Committee held only two formal meetings, this committee met for informal working sessions throughout the period from April through September 2021.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    13


  GOVERNANCE  

PREIT’s by-laws also authorize the establishment of a standing Executive Committee to consist of three members. PREIT’sThe Board of Trustees has not appointed any members to the Executive Committee. If duly constituted, the Executive Committee would be authorized to exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board of Trustees between meetings of the Board of Trustees, except for matters that are expressly reserved by PREIT’s by-laws to the full Board of Trustees or to another committee of the Board of Trustees.

Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Charles P. Pizzi, Chair, M. Walter D’Alessio, Leonard I. Korman and John J. Roberts. The principal duties of the Compensation Committee are to set the annual and long term compensation of PREIT’s executive officers in light of existing agreements and consistent with compensation objectives and policies established by the Compensation Committee, to make recommendations to PREIT’s Board of Trustees regarding incentive compensation and equity-based plans, and to administer these plans. The Compensation Committee does not have the authority to delegate any portion of its responsibilities over the compensation of PREIT’s executive officers to others, although it is assisted by, and consults with, others.

The Compensation Committee met eight times during 2015. MeetingCommittee’s meeting agendas are set by the Chair. The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer in establishing compensation for the named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, and invited the Chief Executive Officer to participate in compensation deliberations by the Compensation Committee concerning PREIT’s named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer.

The Compensation Committee has the exclusive authority to retain and terminate the services of executive compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee evaluates the conflicts of interest of any consultant retained or to be retained consistent with its charter and applicable law. Since October 2010, the Compensation Committee has annually engaged Pay Governance, LLC to serve as the consultant to the Compensation Committee. The compensation consultant periodically advises the Compensation Committee on developing compensation trends and programs among REITsReal Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”) and other public companies. The compensation consultant also presents, from time to time, at the Compensation Committee’s direction, compensation data from several sources, including a proprietary survey of executive compensation among REITs prepared for the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) and from the proxy statements of selected REITs.

The Compensation Committee’s process for setting executive compensation is described under “Compensation—Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis.Overview.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee which is comprised of John J. Roberts, Chair, Michael J. DeMarco, Rosemarie B. Greco and Charles P. Pizzi, met four times during 2015. The principal duties of the Audit Committee are to oversee PREIT’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the audit of PREIT’s financial statements, to select and retain independent auditors, to review with management and the independent auditors PREIT’s annual financial statements and related notes, to review PREIT’s internal audit activities, to review with the independent auditors the planned scope and results of the annual audit and their reports and recommendations, and to review with the independent auditors matters relating to PREIT’s system of internal controls.

PREIT’s audit committee charter provides that no member of the Audit Committee may serve on the audit committee of more than two public companies other than PREIT unless the Board of Trustees determines that such service would not impair the member’s ability to effectively serve on PREIT’s Audit Committee. John J. RobertsNo member of the Audit Committee presently serves on the audit committees of threemore than two other public companies other thanbesides PREIT. The Board of

Trustees has considered Mr. Roberts’ service on these other audit committees and has determined that Mr. Roberts’ service on the other audit committees will not impair his ability to effectively serve in his role on PREIT’s Audit Committee.

Nominating and Governance Committee.Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee whichand the full Board recognize that diversity is comprised of Rosemarie B. Greco, Chair, M. Walter D’Alessio, Leonard I. Kormanvaluable to a well-functioning board, and Mark E. Pasquerilla, met five times during 2015. The principal duties of the Nominating and Governance Committee are to identify individuals qualified to become trustees of PREIT, recommend trustee nominees and trustee committee appointments to the Board of Trustees, review annually the compensation paid to non-employee trustees, develop and recommend a set of governance principles applicable to PREIT, and oversee the evaluation of the performance of PREIT’s Board of Trustees and management with respect to matters other than compensation.

While it does not maintain a formal policy on diversity, the Nominating and Governance Committee chooses candidates for the office of trustee without regard to age, sex, race, religion, national origin or sexual orientation. In selecting candidates for the position of trustee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board recognize that diversity is valuable to a well-functioning board, aspireaspires to increase Board diversity as an essential element in supporting the attainment of PREIT’s strategic objectives, and considerconsiders diversity in a broad sense, including differences of perspectives, experiences, expertise, skills and background. Its charter specifies the following minimum qualifications, qualities and skills that a committee-recommended nominee must possess: the highest character and integrity; sufficient experience to enable a meaningful contribution to PREIT and its Board of Trustees; and sufficient time available to devote to PREIT’s affairs and to carry out the responsibilities of a trustee.

The Nominating and Governance Committee does not solicit recommendations from shareholders regarding trustee nominee candidates, but will consider any such recommendation received in writing and accompanied by sufficient information to enable the Nominating and Governance Committee to assess the candidate’s qualifications, along with confirmation of the candidate’s consent to serve as a trustee if elected. Such recommendations should be sent care of Bruce Goldman,Lisa M. Most, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary, Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, The Bellevue, 200 South BroadOne Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102. 19103.

Any recommendation received from shareholders after January 1 of any year will not be considered until the following year. In addition to considering candidates recommended by shareholders, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers potential candidates recommended by PREIT’s current trustees and officers and is authorized to utilizeuse independent search firms to assist in identifying candidates. The process for screening candidates is the same

14    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

regardless of the source of the recommendation, but only shareholder recommendations are subject to the January 1 deadline for submission for consideration in any given year. In each case, the Nominating and Governance Committee determines whether a recommended candidate meets PREIT’s minimum qualifications and possesses the qualities and skills for trustees, and whether requesting additional information or an interview is appropriate.

Special Committee Regarding PREIT’s Related Party Transactions Policy. The Special Committee relatingChristopher Swann and Kenneth B. Hart, the nominees for the trustee positions to PREIT’s Related Party Transactions Policy (the “Special Committee”), which is comprised of M. Walter D’Alessio, Chair, Leonard I. Kormanbe voted on and Mark E. Pasquerilla, met once during 2015. At that meetingfilled by the Special Committee addressed the saleholders of the Company’s 50% interest in Springfield ParkOutstanding Preferred Shares were nominated by holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares, not the Nominating and Governance Committee. See “Outstanding Preferred Shares Proposal—Proposal to be Voted on by Only Preferred Shareholders—Outstanding Preferred Shares Trustees Election” for a group controlled by Ronald Rubin, the Company’s Executive Chairman. The Special Committee obtained a third party valuationmore detailed description of the Company’s interest,nomination process for Mr. Swann and took into account that (i)Mr. Hart.

Transaction Committee

During 2021, the buyer was also assuming certain Company obligations toBoard approved the formation of a major tenant at the property, (ii) the risks involved in taking over a 50% interest would likely narrow the field of potential buyers, (iii) the asset was a non-core asset,Transaction Committee, which operated from April 2021 through September 2021. This committee provided PREIT with important strategic oversight and (iv) the Company did not maintain a management or leasing roleadvice with respect to consideration of strategic options and related process as the property.Company has been focused on reviewing its business and capital structure and evaluating a wide range of opportunities to further strengthen the Company’s balance sheet and financial flexibility. In light of these factors, the Special Committee found and reported toSeptember 2021, it was determined that the Board of Trustees thatas a whole would exercise this oversight and, accordingly, the transactioncommittee was fair to the Company and that the terms would have been on the same basis if the transaction did not involve a related party, and the Board of Trustees approved the transaction.

The principal duties of the Special Committee are to administer PREIT’s Related Party Transactions Policy by reviewing those transactions that PREIT’s General Counsel determines to be subject to the policy. See “Other Matters—Related Party Transactions Policy.”

Meetings of Independent Trustees

In addition to PREIT’s Board and committee meetings, the independent members of PREIT’s Board of Trustees meet separately at regularly scheduled meetings. The Lead Independent Trustee presides at these meetings. See “Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Conduct—Trustee Independence.”dissolved.

Communicating with the Board of Trustees

Any interested party wishing to communicate with PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees, the independent trustees or any individual PREIT trustee on a confidential basis may do so in writing addressed, as applicable, to the Board of Trustees, the independent trustees or the individual trustee and sent care of Bruce Goldman,Lisa M. Most, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary, Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, The Bellevue, 200 South BroadOne Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102.19103. PREIT’s General Counsel will review any such communication and will deliver such communications to the addressee.

Meetings of the Board of Trustees

The Board of Trustees met thirteen14 times during 2015.2021. All of the trustees serving as trustees in 2021 attended at least 75% of Board and applicable committee meetings in 2015.2021. The Board of Trustees’ policy is that trustees are expected to attend PREIT’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Shareholders, which will be held via Internet in 2022. Last year, all of theseven trustees attendedparticipated in the Annual Meeting.Meeting, which was held via Internet.

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Codes of Conduct

PREIT’s corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics for non-employee trustees, code of business conduct and ethics for officers and employees (which includes the code of ethics applicable to our chief executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), related party transactions policy and the governing charters for the Audit, Nominating and Governance and Compensation Committees of PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees are available free of charge on PREIT’s website at www.preit.com, as well as in print to any shareholder upon request. PREIT’sThe Board of Trustees and Nominating and Governance Committee regularly review corporate governance developments and modify these guidelines, codes and charters as warranted. Any modifications or waivers are reflected on PREIT’s website as soon as practicable.

Employee, Officer and Trustee Hedging

Under PREIT’s corporate governance guidelines, non-employee trustees and executive officers may not engage in hedging transactions involving our securities, including the purchase or sale of puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on PREIT securities, as well as the purchase of any financial instrument (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of PREIT securities. The policy does not restrict hedging by non-executive officer employees or by designees of trustees or executive officers. Under PREIT’s Policy on Selective Disclosure of and/or Use of Inside Information, PREIT strongly discourages all employees from purchasing PREIT securities on margin, engaging in short sales of PREIT securities or buying and selling puts or calls for such securities.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    15


  GOVERNANCE  

Commitment to Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility

PREIT owns a portfolio of high-quality malls in which we create environments where retailers and customers connect. The Company continuously strives to align its business strategy with its commitment to responsible corporate citizenship. PREIT’s properties serve as gathering places within the community, making sustainability an important focus.

During 2021, our cross-functional leadership group continued to focus our environmental, social and governance efforts. Quarterly updates on the group’s work are provided to the Nominating and Governance Committee. Our commitment to sustainability influences how we operate and redevelop our centers, provide dynamic experiences for our guests, conduct business with our partners, engage within our communities and create an engaging work environment for our colleagues.

Below are some of the highlights of our commitment in this area:

ENVIRONMENTAL

We have undertaken a number of initiatives to increase energy efficiency, lower our operating costs, reduce waste and decrease our overall environmental impact.

Solar Energy. We have installed solar panels on the rooftops of five of our centers, allowing us to convert unused space into a productive energy source. These systems combined are expected to generate more than 7.7 million kilowatt hours of energy each year. The annual environmental benefit accrued through the production of renewable energy at these five properties is equivalent to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from more than 1,200 passenger vehicles.

Energy Efficient Roofs. Over 85% of our centers’ rooftops contain at least a portion of white roofs. These roofs reflect sunlight, which prevents heat from damaging the roof and extends the life of the roof, and keeps the buildings cool to help reduce summer energy usage.

LED Lighting. We have installed energy efficient lighting at over half of our properties, including in interior spaces and parking lots, which is expected to reduce our energy usage. We believe that LED lighting provides many advantages over traditional lighting, including lower energy usage, reduced maintenance and increased safety. Recent exterior lighting projects at Dartmouth Mall and Prince George’s are expected to reduce usage by 467k KWH/per month and 611 KWH/per month respectively, and an interior common area LED conversion at Valley Mall approximately 1624 KWH/per month. We have been able to source incentive and rebate funding for these example projects with minimal cost to us. The corporate headquarters is equipped with LED lighting and room occupancy sensors to curb unnecessary consumption and decrease our carbon footprint.

Peak Demand Monitoring. Over half of our centers use peak demand monitors to gauge power usage, enabling our centers to increase energy cost-savings and make more efficient use of energy throughout the year.

Waste Reduction. All of our centers, as well as our corporate headquarters, participate in recycling programs. To reduce waste, we have partnered with recycling service providers at several of our properties and we continue to explore opportunities to expand recycling across our portfolio. Our recycling programs divert cardboard, glass and plastic from landfills. Additionally, we have recycling programs at properties for clothing, books and cooking oil.

Alternative Transportation. We encourage, and seek to better enable, our shoppers and employees to reduce their carbon footprint by using environmentally friendly means of transportation. All of our centers are within walking distance to public transportation, including bus stops and rail stations. We offer electric vehicle charging stations, with a total of 74 chargers, across a number of our properties and over 95% of our properties offer bike racks. We continue to install new electric vehicle charging stations at in-demand malls by partnering with several national companies.

SOCIAL

We believe that our properties are important centerpieces in their communities. Our portfolio supports over 20,000 jobs including full and part-time employees and our own staff. We also believe that a key element that will drive

16    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

success in business is cultivating skills and services for small, diverse and emerging businesses that make our property experiences unique; developing an innovative, compassionate workforce across our platform and cultivating relationships across stakeholder groups, all of which will drive the future of our business.

As a community hub, hosting events that bring the community together is natural. Every year, we host hundreds of engaging events across our portfolio. These events range from character meet and greets to vendor shows to drive-in experiences, live events and more. A key element to our event platform is partnering with community organizations to bring needed support to our communities. Effective in 2021, each seasonal campaign designed to drive business to our tenants, also supports a related community need. For example, during the 2021 back-to-school season, each PREIT property partnered with a local non-profit throughout the month of August to collect and distribute backpacks and school supplies for students in need. Across its footprint, we collaborated with ten non-profits to ensure students in its communities have the resources they need to kickstart a successful school year. In total, our properties collected over 2,000 backpacks and supplies to benefit local families in need.

Community Health. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were among the first in the country to close our properties to curb the spread of the disease. Our properties prioritized the health and safety of our customers and tenants by instituting new protocols that promote hygiene and notification protocols to avoid the spread of COVID-19. Our properties proactively sought to act as host sites for blood drives, food donation drives, food distribution efforts and the distribution of masks and other protective supplies to local hospitals and first responders. In addition, COVID-19 testing and vaccination sites were located on several of our properties. We partnered with the state of New Jersey to license space at our Moorestown Mall for a COVID-19 vaccination mega site, one of only six selected within the state. The location had vaccination capacity of between 4,000-6,000 appointments per day. Additionally, we had ten PPE vending machines installed on properties, further supporting the health and well-being of our communities.

Community Social Engagement and Assistance. Our centers host a variety of seasonal, family-friendly events to engage with the communities that we serve. We provide community services and resources that are inviting, welcoming and free of charge, including mall walker programs, internet accessibility and community play spaces. We also work with various community groups to support the communities where our properties are located. We hosted a dozen job fairs at our properties, bringing together onsite and local businesses with job seekers. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting disruption to our tenants, PREIT developed and implemented many new offerings across its portfolio, including:

its own contactless pick up solution, “Mall2Go”;

“Shop Local” webpages aggregating ecommerce sites for all the small businesses throughout our portfolio. The offerings highlighted these businesses not only to the local audience, but to customers of the entire PREIT portfolio, leveraging the Company’s marketing power for local business partners; and

An “SBA Resources” page that was designed to offer resources for smaller businesses to access the liquidity needed to make it through closure periods.

Additionally, in 2021, we launched a “Support Black-owned Business and Brands 365” initiative in which custom website pages were created highlighting Black-owned retailers, restaurants and pop-up shops. Additionally, our properties hosted a dozen blacked-owned business showcases.

Human Capital. Our key human capital management objectives are to attract, retain and develop the highest quality talent to enhance our mission of enriching communities through the built environment. To support these objectives, our human resources programs are designed to: reward and support employees through competitive pay, benefits, and perquisite programs; enhance the Company’s culture through efforts aimed at making the workplace more engaging and inclusive; acquire and develop talent and facilitate internal talent mobility; and evolve and invest in technology, tools, and other resources for our employees. We have programs in place for our associates that are designed to ensure employee satisfaction and engagement. We conduct an annual culture survey to engage employees and identify opportunities. Our employees, many of whom have a long tenure with the Company, frequently express satisfaction with management. Our employees are offered regular opportunities to participate in professional development programs, including tuition reimbursement, continuing education reimbursement, and leadership training. In January 2020, we relocated our corporate headquarters to an office that is designed to create a better sense of place and pride and to cultivate a more collaborative work

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    17


  GOVERNANCE  

environment. PREIT embraces diversity as valuable to a well-functioning company and provides equal opportunities without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, age, sexual orientation, gender/gender identity, disability, status as a protected veteran, or any other characteristic protected by applicable federal, state and local laws. We also endeavor to maintain workplaces that are free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of any such status or characteristic. As of October 5, 2021, 63 percent of our employee population is female and 21 percent is represented by minorities. At the same time, one-third of our Named Executive Officers are female. The health and safety of our employees is a high priority, in particular during the COVID-19 pandemic. In protecting our employees’ safety, we have invested in creating safe work environments for our employees by taking additional measures such as additional work from home flexibility, increased cleaning protocols and enhanced communication and engagement regarding Company responses to the pandemic. We also offer various wellness initiatives for our employees. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic disruption, together with the preexisting economic challenges facing the retail industry, the Company implemented reductions-in-force and unpaid furloughs in 2020. In order to attempt to ease the effects of such actions, the Company extended health insurance to furloughed employees for certain periods and encouraged use of the Company’s existing wellness and mental health services through its employee assistance program. The Company has since brought furloughed employees back to full pay.

Charitable Giving. Our properties supported numerous charitable organizations in 2021, and many of our properties allowed charitable organizations to use a space within the property, free of charge. Our corporate giving program made donations to a number of charitable organizations in 2021, hosted blood and food drives, and has raised awareness for various non-profit organizations through executive participation. PREIT has worked with local non-profit organizations to collect diapers for families in need, resulting in the donation of over 25,000 diapers to thirteen organizations; local food banks and hunger-based organizations, leading to $10,000 in donations to fourteen organizations combatting food insecurity; and as already discussed above, ten local non-profit organizations in order to collect and distribute over 2,000 backpacks and supplies to local families in need. PREIT has also taken the initiative to highlight tenants who have supported LGBTQ+ community organizations.

GOVERNANCE

PREIT and its Board of Trustees are dedicated to maintaining a high standard for corporate governance based on integrity, ethics and transparency. Each of our current trustees, other than our CEO, meets the NYSE standard for independence. Our trustees stand for re-election every year. In furtherance of PREIT’s sustainability initiatives and commitment, sustainability practices and goals are overseen by our Board of Trustees, specifically by the Chair of our Nominating and Governance Committee, JoAnne Epps.

Trustee Independence

All of PREIT’s current non-employee trustees are independent. Including employee trustees,independent, which means that, if all Board nominated nominees are elected, plus two nominees nominated by holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares, more than three quarters (seven out of nine)a majority of the members of PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees in the period from 2015 to 2016 are independent. If all of the candidates for trustee at the Annual Meeting are elected, seven out of nine trustees for the period from 2016 to 2017 will again be independent. For a trustee to be considered independent, PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees must determine that the trustee does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with PREIT. PREIT’sThe Board of Trustees has established guidelines to assist it in determining trustee independence, which are contained in the Company’s corporate governance guidelines. These guidelines conform to the independence requirements contained in the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE listing rules. In addition, PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees has adopted categorical standards to assist it in making determinations of independence.

18    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

Standards of Independence

The guidelines and the categorical standards used by PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees to determine whether a trustee is independent specify that:

 

1.

Other than in his or her capacity as a trustee or shareholder of PREIT, no independent trustee shall have a material relationship with PREIT (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, officer or other affiliate of an organization, including a charitable organization, that has a material relationship with PREIT). For this purpose, a trustee shall be presumed not to have a material relationship with PREIT if he or she

is not and, within the past two years, has not been an executive officer of, or the direct or indirect owner of more than 10% of the equity interest in, any business or professional entity:

 

that within the last two years has made or received, or going forward proposes to make or receive, payments to or from PREIT or any of its subsidiaries for property or services in excess of 5% of (i) PREIT’s consolidated gross revenues for its last full fiscal year, or (ii) the other entity’s consolidated gross revenues for its last full fiscal year; or

 

to which PREIT or any of its affiliates is indebted in an aggregate amount exceeding 5% of PREIT’s total consolidated assets as of the end of PREIT’s last full fiscal year.

 

2.

No independent trustee shall have been employed by PREIT, and no immediate family member of an independent trustee shall have been an executive officer of PREIT, within the past three years.

 

3.

No independent trustee shall have received more than $120,000 in direct annual compensation from PREIT within the past three years, other than trustee and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service).

 

4.

No independent trustee shall have been affiliated with or employed by a present or former auditor of PREIT within the last three years.

 

5.

Within the last three years, no independent trustee shall have been an employee of another company if an executive officer of PREIT then served on the compensation committee of such other company.

 

6.

Within the last three years, no independent trustee shall have served as an executive officer or employee of a company that made payments to, or received payments from, PREIT for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

 

7.

No immediate family member of an independent trustee shall fit within the categories prohibited by any of the foregoing (other than with respect to the prohibition on employment by PREIT, which addresses immediate family members directly), and no independent trustee may have any relationships with PREIT that are substantially similar to any of the categories prohibited by the foregoing.

 

8.

Independent trustees shall satisfy any other independence criteria required by applicable law or regulation or established by the Board of Trustees.

The Board of Trustees determined that the following sevensix members of PREIT’s current nineseven member Board satisfy the New York Stock Exchange’sNYSE’s independence requirements and PREIT’s guidelines: M. Walter D’Alessio,George J. Alburger, Jr., Michael J. DeMarco, Rosemarie B. Greco, Leonard I. Korman,JoAnne A. Epps, Mark E. Pasquerilla, Charles P. Pizzi and John J. Roberts. Despite his change in title, Ronald Rubin willMr. Coradino, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is our only current trustee who is not be deemed independentconsidered independent. The Board of Trustees has not made any determination as to the independence of Christopher Swann or Kenneth B. Hart.

In making this determination, the Board of Trustees considered Mr. Pizzi’s relationships with: (i) Brandywine Realty Trust, a company with which we conduct business by leasing our headquarters and to which we have recently agreed to sell our Exton Square Mall property and where Mr. Pizzi serves as a trustee; (ii) Independence Blue Cross, from which we purchase healthcare benefits for 2016 to 2017 because of his recent serviceour employees and where Mr. Pizzi serves as an executive officerchairman of the Company.board of directors; and (iii) Conner Strong & Buckelew, a company with which we had a relationship before Mr. Pizzi joined our Board and which serves as our property and casualty insurance broker and for which Mr. Pizzi served as a consultant until December 31, 2021. The Board of Trustees also considered Mr. Pizzi’s role as a member of the advisory board of PNC Philadelphia, as PREIT also has a commercial relationship with PNC Philadelphia. The Board of Trustees

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    19


  GOVERNANCE  

determined that Mr. Pizzi does not have any direct or indirect material relationship or interest in the transactions between PREIT and these entities, that he has not had any role in the negotiation of these transactions or received compensation benefits related to these transactions and that the parties have entered into these transactions on an arms’ length basis generally in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the Board of Trustees determined Mr. Pizzi to be independent.

All members of each of the Compensation Committee, Audit Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee of PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees must be, and are, independent trustees. Members of the Audit Committee must also, and do, satisfy additional Securities and Exchange Commission independence requirements, which provide that they may not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from PREIT or any of its subsidiaries other than compensation for serving on PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees or on committees of PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees.

Board Service

Over the past four years, five trustees of the Company left the Board of Trustees, most of whom had served for more than 10 years. Last year, our Board recommended the election of Mr. DeMarco as a new director. Three years ago, Mr. Pizzi joined our Board, and four years ago, we welcomed Ms. Greco back to our Board following a short

break in service. We expect that our Nominating and Governance Committee will continue to consider, among other things, the relative mix of the lengths of service of our trustees in making recommendations for nominees as trustee.

Related Party Transactions Policy

PREIT’s

The Board of Trustees has adopted a written policy related to the review, approval and approval or ratificationoversight of related party transactions. The procedures set forth in the policy do not replace or supersede any other policies or procedures related to the approval of transactions by PREIT as set forth in PREIT’s other corporate governance policies or as required by law. See “Other Matters—Related Party Transactions Policy.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Mr. DeMarco, Mr. Alburger and Mr. Pizzi served on the Compensation Committee during 2021. No member of PREIT’s Compensation Committee is or was during 20152021 an employee, or is or ever has been an officer, of PREIT or its subsidiaries. No executive officer of PREIT served as a director or a member of the compensation committee of another company, one of whose executive officers serves as a member of PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees or Compensation Committee.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance2021 Trustee Compensation

Section 16(a)

Our philosophy for trustee compensation is that it should be made in proportion to the amount and complexity of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires PREIT’s executive officers and trustees and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of PREIT’s equity securities (collectively, the “reporting persons”) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownershipwork required, aligned with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish PREIT with copies of these reports. Based on PREIT’s review of the copies of the reports it has received, and written representations received from certain reporting persons with respect to the filing of reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5, PREIT believes that all filings required to be made under Section 16(a) by the reporting persons since the beginning of 2015 were made on a timely basis, except that Mr. Leonard Korman, onelong-term interests of our trustees, failedshareholders, transparent to timely report on a Form 5 two gifts of 34,600 shares in the aggregate to his family foundation.

2015 Trustee Compensation

Eachour shareholders and consistent with trustee independence. Trustees employed by PREIT do not receive additional compensation for serving as trustee. Trustees who isare not an employeeemployees of PREIT received an annual retainer for 2015 of $45,000, plus $1,500 per Board of Trustees or committee meeting in whichreceive the trustee participated. In addition, the Lead Independent Trustee receives an additional retainer of $25,000, the Chair of PREIT’s Audit Committee receives an additional retainer of $15,000, the Chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee each receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000, and the Chair of the Special Committee established under PREIT’s Related Party Transactions Policy receives an additional annual retainer of $5,000.following cash compensation:

2021 ($)

Annual Cash Retainer

60,000

Additional Retainer

Lead Independent Trustee

25,000

Audit Committee Chair

20,000

Compensation Committee Chair

15,000

Nominating and Governance Committee Chair

15,000

Special Committee Chair

5,000

Transaction Committee Chair(1)

120,000

Board/Committee Meeting Fee

1,500

(1)

The Board approved a cash fee to the Transaction Committee Chair of $120,000. This amount was for all work conducted on behalf of the Transaction Committee. The fees paid were in recognition of the expanded services provided and additional responsibilities taken on by the Transaction Committee Chair. The Transaction Committee was subsequently disbanded, with the expectation that no future compensation will be awarded in relation to the Transaction Committee.

20    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

Non-employee trustees also typically receive restricted shares annually, which vest overafter one year. Such annual award is granted on the first day of the annual term of service, on the date following our annual meeting of shareholders. During 2021, the equity component of the Trustees’ compensation was granted in the form of restricted share units, which upon vesting one year following grant, will be settled in common shares of beneficial interest or cash as determined by the Compensation Committee. In 2015,2021, the Board of Trustees determined that the award of restricted sharesshare units to non-employee trustees would be equal in value to $85,000,$115,000, which equated to 3,732 shares61,845 restricted share units based on the $22.773$1.86 average of the closing prices of PREIT shares for the 20 trading days prior to the date of grant. The shares were awarded under the Second Amended and Restated 2003Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. In past years, it had been the practice of PREIT to grant to each newly elected trustee an option to purchase 5,000 shares, which vested over four years. In 2014, prior to the election of Michael J. Demarco as a trustee, the Company discontinued this practice.

The following table summarizes the fees and other compensation earned by our non-employee trustees for their service on our Board of Trustees and any committees of the Board of Trustees during 2015.2021.

 

Name

  Fees Earned
or Paid in

Cash ($)
   Stock
Awards ($)(1)
   Total ($)   Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(1)
   Stock
Awards ($)(2)
   Total ($)   

M. Walter D’Alessio

   112,500     83,168     195,668  

George J. Alburger, Jr.

  

 

169,000(3)

 

  

 

115,000    

 

  

 

284,000  

Michael J. DeMarco

   55,500     83,168     138,668    

 

435,500(4)

 

  

 

115,000    

 

  

 

550,500  

Rosemarie B. Greco

   88,000     83,168     171,168  

Leonard I. Korman

   81,000     83,168     164,168  

JoAnne A. Epps

  

 

132,000   

 

  

 

115,000    

 

  

 

247,000  

Mark E. Pasquerilla

   70,500     83,168     153,668    

 

115,500   

 

  

 

115,000    

 

  

 

230,500  

Charles P. Pizzi

   89,500     83,168     172,668    

 

128,000   

 

  

 

115,000    

 

  

 

243,000  

John J. Roberts

   94,500     83,168     177,668    

 

135,500   

 

  

 

115,000    

 

  

 

250,500  

Donald F. Mazziotti(2)

   19,500          19,500  

 

(1)

Due to timing of payments, in addition to payment of 2021 board and committee cash retainers, includes (i) payments made to the chair ($160,000) and the members ($20,000) of the Special Finance Committee (Messrs. DeMarco, Alburger and Roberts), which was in place from September through December 2020, for service on that committee in 2020, (ii) deferred payment of meeting fees to all non-employee trustees in the amount of $15,000, related to meetings held in 2020, (iii) a payment to Mr. Alburger of $4,500 for meetings held in 2020 and for which his payments were not processed in 2020, and (iv) meeting fees for 43 board and committee meetings held in 2021.

(2)

The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value as determined in accordance with Topic 718 based on the average of the high and low sale prices of a common share on the date of grant.grant of restricted share units. For information regarding significant factors, assumptions and methodologies used in our computations pursuant to Topic 718, see Note 8, “Share Based Compensation,” to PREIT’s consolidated financial statements included in PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2021.

 

(2)(3)Mr. Mazziotti did not stand

Due to timing of payments, includes payments for reelection at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.three meetings held in 2020.

(4)

Due to timing of payments in 2021, includes payment for Special Finance Committee Chair role in 2020 and Transaction Committee Chair role in 2021.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    21


  GOVERNANCE  

The following table summarizes the aggregate number of restricted sharesshare units and options held by our non-employee trustees at December 31, 2015.2021.

 

Name

  Restricted
Shares
   Total
Options
   Exercisable
Options
   Unexercisable
Options
   

Restricted
Share

Units(a)

  Total
Options
  Exercisable
Options
  

Unexercisable

Options

M. Walter D’Alessio

   3,732                 

George J. Alburger, Jr.

    61,845            

Michael J. DeMarco

   3,732                     61,845            

Rosemarie B. Greco

   3,732     5,000     3,750     1,250  

Leonard I. Korman

   3,732                 

JoAnne A. Epps

    61,845            

Mark E. Pasquerilla

   3,732                     61,845            

Charles P. Pizzi

   3,732     5,000     2,500     2,500      61,845    5,000    5,000    

John J. Roberts

   3,732                     61,845            

(a)

These awards may be settled in cash or common shares as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Information about our Executive Officers

The following information is provided with respect to each of our current non-trustee executive officers. Information regarding Joseph F. Coradino, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is provided above in the “Governance—Nominees for Trustee—Board of Trustees Nominees for the Office of Trustee” section beginning on page 7. Each of our executive officers was employed by PREIT during 2020 and 2021. As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company completed a financial restructuring in 2020 pursuant to the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust and Certain of Its Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries (with Additional Technical Modifications As of November 20, 2020), and the final decree closing the bankruptcy case was entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on March 11, 2021. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board of Trustees to serve in their respective capacities until their successors are duly appointed and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.

JOSEPH J. ARISTONE

Age: 56

Executive Vice President—Head of Leasing of PREIT since 2017. Senior Vice President and Head of Leasing of PREIT from 2007 to 2017. Vice President, Anchor Leasing of PREIT from 2003 to 2007.

HEATHER CROWELL

Age: 43

Executive Vice President—Strategy and Communications of PREIT since 2019. Senior Vice President—Strategy and Communications of PREIT from 2017 to 2019. Senior Vice President—Corporate Communications and Investor Relations of PREIT from 2016 to 2017. Vice President—Corporate Communications and Investor Relations of PREIT from 2012 to 2016. Director—Asset Management of PREIT from 2006 to 2012.

ANDREW M. IOANNOU

Age: 47

Executive Vice President—Finance and Acquisitions of PREIT since 2015. Treasurer of PREIT and PREIT Services, LLC since 2010. Senior Vice President—Capital Markets of PREIT from 2010 to 2015. Vice President—Capital Markets of PREIT Services, LLC and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. from 2005 to 2010.

LISA M. MOST

Age: 52

Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary of PREIT since 2019. Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary of PREIT from 2018 to 2019. Senior Vice President—Legal of PREIT from 2016 to 2018. Vice President—Legal of PREIT from 2014 to 2016. Director—Legal of PREIT from 2004 to 2014. Employed by PREIT since 1999.

22    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  GOVERNANCE  

SATHANA SEMONSKY

Age: 48

Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of PREIT since 2021. PREIT’s Corporate Controller since 2019. Previously Director at CFGI, an accounting advisory firm, from 2017 to 2019, and Divisional Controller at American Realty Capital (now American Realty Global) from 2012 to 2017.

MARIO C. VENTRESCA, JR.

Age: 55

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2020. Executive Vice President—Operations of PREIT from 2015 through 2019. Senior Vice President—Asset Management of PREIT Services, LLC from 2005 to 2015. Vice President—Retail Asset Management of PREIT Services, LLC from 2000 to 2005.

COMPENSATIONOwnership of Trustee Nominees and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares and Outstanding Preferred Shares for each trustee, each nominee for the office of trustee, and each named executive officer as of April 11, 2022, as well as all trustees and executive officers of the Company as a group. As of such date, other than Mr. Swann and Mr. Hart, none of the nominees for the office of trustee or PREIT’s executive officers owned any shares of any series of PREIT’s Outstanding Preferred Shares.

All percentages for the common shares are calculated based on 80,616,801 shares outstanding as of April 11, 2022. All percentages for the Outstanding Preferred Shares are calculated based on 3,450,000 Series B Preferred, 6,900,000 Series C Preferred, and 5,000,000 Series D Preferred outstanding as of April 11, 2022. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each individual identified is c/o PREIT, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Unless indicated otherwise, each individual has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares.

  Common Shares Preferred Shares
Name of
Beneficial

Owner
 Number of
Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 Percent of 
Class of
Common
Shares
 Number
of Series
B
Preferred
Shares
 Percent of
Class of
Series B
Preferred
Shares
 

Number
of Series
C
Preferred

Shares

 Percent of
Class of
Series C
Preferred
Shares
 Number
of Series
D
Preferred
Shares
 Percent of 
Class of
Series D
Preferred
Shares
 

Number of

Total
Preferred
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned

 

Percent of

Class of
Total
Preferred
 Outstanding 
Shares

  

Joseph F. Coradino

   766,276(1)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Mark E. Pasquerilla

   339,795(2)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

   177,551(3)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Andrew M. Ioannou

   128,855(4)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Joseph J. Aristone

   143,658(5)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Heather Crowell

   117,051(6)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Lisa M. Most

   115,746(7)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

John J. Roberts

   254,093(8)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Charles P. Pizzi

   227,526(9)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Michael J. DeMarco

   117,527(10)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

George J. Alburger, Jr.

   214,475(11)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

JoAnne A. Epps

   192,281(12)    *   0   *   0   *   0   *   0   *
  

Christopher Swann

   1,636,466(13)    2.0%   306,048   8.9%   379,228   5.5%   357,591   7.2%   1,042,867(13)    6.8%
  

Kenneth B. Hart

   20,400(14)    *   0   *   157,695   2.3%   0   *   157,695(14)    1.0%
  

Trustees and executive officers as a group (13 persons)

   2,797,825(15)    3.5%   0   *   0   *   0  

 

*

   0   *

*

Less than one percent.

(1)

Includes 656,677 common shares that Mr. Coradino owns directly, 70,473 Class A units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. that Mr. Coradino owns directly, and 39,126 Class A units of limited partnership

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    23


  GOVERNANCE  

interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. that Mr. Coradino owns indirectly through a trust. Class A units are redeemable for cash or, at PREIT’s option, for a like number of common shares. Mr. Coradino also owns RSUs, which may be settled only for cash and vest on March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2024, which are not reflected in the above table.

(2)

Includes 170,828 common shares directly owned by Mr. Pasquerilla as well as 61,845 RSUs that vest within 60 days, 55,208 shares held by Marenrico Partnership, and 51,914 shares held by Pasquerilla Enterprises, LP, an entity controlled by Mr. Pasquerilla, and its subsidiaries. All of the shares held by Pasquerilla Enterprises, LP are pledged as collateral to Somerset Trust Company and 33,575 shares held by Marenrico Partnership are pledged as collateral to Merrill Lynch with respect to a margin account. 28,047 shares held by Mr. Pasquerilla directly are in a pledged account with Merrill Lynch, but currently no debt is outstanding in this account.

(3)

Mr. Ventresca directly owns all 177,551 shares (which includes 46,476 shares with respect to which he shares voting and investment power with his spouse).

(4)

Mr. Ioannou directly owns all 128,855 shares (which includes 67,091 shares with respect to which he shares voting and investment power with his spouse).

(5)

Mr. Aristone directly owns all 143,658 shares.

(6)

Ms. Crowell directly owns all 117,051 shares.

(7)

Ms. Most directly owns all 115,746 shares.

(8)

Includes 102,222 common shares directly owned by Mr. Roberts, 61,845 RSUs that vest within 60 days, and 90,026 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust.

(9)

Includes 160,681 common shares directly owned by Mr. Pizzi, 61,845 RSUs that vest within 60 days, and 5,000 shares subject to exercisable options.

(10)

Includes 55,682 common shares directly owned by Mr. DeMarco as well as 61,845 RSUs that vest within 60 days.

(11)

Includes 152,630 common shares directly owned by Mr. Alburger as well as 61,845 RSUs that vest within 60 days.

(12)

Includes 130,436 common shares directly owned by Ms. Epps as well as 61,845 RSUs that vest within 60 days.

(13)

Includes 1,000 common shares and 4,000 shares of Series D Preferred directly owned by Mr. Swann, 190,000 common shares held in an account by Mr. Swann’s spouse over which he shares voting and dispositive power, and the remaining shares are beneficially owned in the aggregate by Cygnus Property Fund IV, LLC, Cygnus Property Fund V, LLC and Cygnus Property Fund VI, LLC. All shares are pledged in margin accounts.

(14)

Includes 6,900 common shares and 35,170 Series C Preferred shares that are owned by Vaughn D. Hart, brother of Kenneth B. Hart. Kenneth B. Hart has shared dispositive rights in the shares owned by Vaughn D. Hart. Kenneth B. Hart has informed us that Vaughn D. Hart has informally agreed to vote his shares in favor of Kenneth B. Hart’s nomination for preferred trustee. 47,175 Series C Preferred Shares owned by Kenneth B. Hart are pledged as collateral in non-retirement accounts at Fidelity and Merrill Lynch, and 14,500 Series C Preferred Shares owned by Vaughn D. Hart included above are pledged at Fidelity.

(15)

Includes 2,312,156 shares held directly or indirectly, 5,000 shares subject to exercisable options, 371,070 RSUs that vest within 60 days, and an aggregate of 109,599 Class A units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. that are redeemable for cash or, at PREIT’s option, for a like number of common shares.

24    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


LOGO

COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL TO BE VOTED ON BY COMMON SHAREHOLDERS—PROPOSAL TWO—Advisory Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance withPursuant to Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requirements, our shareholders have the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding basis, to approve the compensation of our named executive officers for 2021, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC disclosure rules.

We urge you to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”“Executive Compensation Overview” section beginning on page 2427 and the compensation tables and narrative discussion beginning on page 4035 of this Proxy Statement. We believe that the compensation of our named executive officers should be approved for the following reasons:

 

Compensation decisions are made by independent trustees who are not part of management and comprise the Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee of our Board of Trustees (the “Compensation Committee”).Committee. These decisions result from a formal, deliberative process, including advice from an independent compensation consultant selected by the Compensation Committee.

 

The principal goals of the Compensation Committee are to ensure that the interests of our shareholders and the interests of our named executive officers are aligned and that our named executive officers are motivated to achieve established business objectives in an effort to maximize value for our shareholders. These goals are achieved in five principal ways: (i) limitingsetting fixed base salary so that the largest component of the compensation of aeach named executive officer consists of equity and incentive compensation; (ii) emphasizing equity compensation as thea principal form of compensation over cash compensation; (iii) conditioning the vesting of equity or equity-based compensation on corporate performance, primarily relativeincluding operating metrics, total shareholder return (“TSR”) and/or continued service to PREIT; (iv) tying annual cash incentives to operating performance, as measured primarily, but not exclusively, by Funds From Operations (“FFO”), and taking into consideration additional articulated performance metrics and strategic objectives, as the achievementsame may be adjusted by the Compensation Committee or the Board in response to events or transactions that make it, in light of which are deemed important for reaching ourthe Company’s strategic and business goals;objectives, appropriate to do so; and (v) requiring named executive officers to own minimum stated amounts of our securities. We believe that FFO is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as gains on sales of operating real estate and depreciation and amortization of real estate, among others. FFO is a commonly used measure of operating performance and profitability among REITs, and we use FFO as a supplemental non-GAAP measure to compare our performance for different periods to that of our industry peers. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains and losses on sales of operating properties, extraordinary items (computed in accordance with GAAP) and significant non-recurring events that materially distort the comparative measurement of company performance over time, plus real estate depreciation and amortization; and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect funds from operations on the same basis.

 

The equity awards align the interests of our shareholders and our named executive officers by encouraging officers to focus on corporate performance in an effort to generate an increase in share value. VestingHistorically, vesting of Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) granted under our RSU Programs isprograms was dependent upon achieving certain relative total shareholder return (“TSR”)TSR levels over a three-year period. In the programs approved for the 2020-2022 period and 2021-2023 period, the performance-based restricted share units (“PSUs”) vest, and a number of shares are earned, based upon PREIT’s performance in certain operating performance measures and a modification based on the TSR of PREIT over the applicable measurement period compared to an index of other REITs. The RSUsPSUs have directly aligned the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders since there hasbecause PSUs expire without issuance of shares when TSR thresholds have not been no vestingachieved for the relevant measurement periods, and conversely shares are issued when relative returns to shareholders were below the threshold under the applicable RSU Program, and vesting has occurred when relative returns to shareholders met the criteria. RSUs have been awarded in all but one year since 2006 and, based on relative TSR, none of the RSUs had vested prior to December 31, 2012.long-term operating goals are met. Due to the relative TSRCompany’s performance, no shares were issued pursuant to the PSUs awarded under the 2019-2021 PSU Program. For the long-term equity incentive program approved for the 2019-2021 period, as part of the restricted share awards (and not as separate awards), outperformance units (“OPUs”) were granted with the restricted shares, which OPUs vest, and shares are issued, based on a multiplier applied to the number of time-based restricted shares determined by the achievement of the performance objectives set forth with respect to the OPUs. These awards vested as a result of the achievement of the operating performance goals over the three-year measurement period ended December 31, 2021 as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2022, and were settled in shares in early 2022. See “Compensation—Executive Compensation Overview—Long-Term Incentive Awards—2019 – 2021 Outperformance Unit Payouts.”

Company for the three years ended on December 31, 2015, which placed the Company at the 53rd percentile of the companies in the relevant index, resulting in the payout of 106% of the number of RSUs, 134,733 shares were issued pursuant to the RSUs awarded in 2013.

 

The structure of our annual cash incentive awards in 2015 permitted2021 was based on (i) the Compensation Committee to consider, in addition to FFO per share, the key metricsachievement of 20 enumerated strategic goals, (ii) an established capital expenditures target goal, (iii) growth in same store net operating income the leverage ratio(“Same Store NOI”), and (iv) a discretionary, qualitative assessment of the Company under its principal credit facility, occupancy costsexecutive officers’ performance as a percentage of tenant sales, return on assets, comparable store sales per square foot, in line occupancy, gross rent renewal spreads and the ratio of general and administrative costs to gross revenues, which were important to the goals of the Company for the year. These key metrics were directly related to our four key strategic goals for the year: improved operating results, improved balance sheet, improved portfolio quality and positioning the Company for growth. While FFO remained the single most significant metric under the awards, thegroup. The Compensation Committee hadplaced emphasis on the right to consider these othermanagement team’s success in achieving outperformance targets for qualitative metrics, which, depending uponbut also recognized the judgment of the Committee,decline in the aggregate could beCompany’s share price, as or more significant than FFOdiscussed in determining payments under the awards.“Executive Compensation Overview” section beginning on page 27.

 

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    25


The general and administrative costs of the Company, which include executive compensation expense, as a percentage of revenues, declined slightly in 2015. In addition, ongoing compensation payable to senior executive officers has been reduced meaningfully in the past few years by the separation of three senior officers during 2012 and one additional senior officer during 2014, none of whom has been replaced at a comparable compensation level.  COMPENSATION  

We seek the approval of the resolution set forth below:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of PREIT approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers for 2021 as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 20162022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the applicable disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis,Overview, the 20152021 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and accompanying narrative.”

This “say on pay” vote is advisory, and is not binding on PREIT, the Board of Trustees or the Compensation Committee. However, we value the opinions of our shareholders and annually seek their approval in this “say on pay” vote. The Compensation Committee will consider the results of the vote on the resolution and evaluate whether any actions in response to the vote are necessary in connection with future compensation determinations.

Board Recommendation

Our Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders vote FOR the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

26    2022 Proxy StatementCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

Executive Compensation Overview

Introduction

This Compensation

As a smaller reporting company, we are required to present compensation information regarding 2021 and 2020 compensation earned by or paid to all persons who served as Chief Executive Officer of our Company at any time during 2021, and our two most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2021. Further, as a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide all of the disclosures required for a “Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”)Analysis” as set forth in the rules promulgated by the SEC. The Company is, however, providing an overview of its executive compensation program to aid its shareholders understanding of how its business and performance affects its executive compensation decisions. Furthermore, in the interests of transparency, we have chosen to present information regarding the compensation of each person who served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during 2021, our most recently completed fiscal year, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2021. As a result of strong internal pay equity among our executive team, this results in presentation of compensation for six executive officers and, for purposes of this Proxy Statement, we refer to those six individuals as our named executive officers, or NEOs. This discussion focuses on the compensation of ourthe following named executive officers:

Named Executive Officers*

Joseph F. Coradino

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.Joseph J. AristoneHeather CrowellAndrew M. IoannouLisa M. Most

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Trustees

(principal executive officer)

Executive Vice
President – Chief
Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

Executive Vice President –
Leasing
Executive Vice President –
Strategy and Communications
Executive Vice President –
Finance and Acquisitions
Executive
Vice
President – General
Counsel

*

Please see “Governance—Information about our Executive Officers” for more information.

Mr. Coradino Chief Executive Officer; Ronald Rubin, Executive Chairman; Robert F. McCadden, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Bruce Goldman, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; and Mario C. Ventresca, Jr., Executive Vice President—Operations.

Each of the named executive officers other than Mr. Ventresca each currently has an employment agreement whichthat is described in this Proxy Statement under “2015“Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements” beginning on page 42.45. The employment agreements established minimum base salaries and eligibility to participate in cash incentive and equity programs in 2015,2021, as determined by the Compensation Committee. While Mr. Ventresca doesAristone, Ms. Crowell, Mr. Ioannou and Ms. Most do not have an employment agreementagreements with the Company, hebut each is covered by the PREIT Services, LLC Severance Pay Plan for Certain Officers (effective January 1, 2007) (the “Severance Plan”), as modified by atheir respective letter agreement with Mr. Ventresca dated May 8, 2013.agreements. The details of Mr. Ventresca’s arrangementthese four executives’ severance arrangements are also described in this Proxy Statement under “2015“Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements” beginning on page 42.45.

20152021 Performance

PREIT’s

PREIT is a publicly traded REIT that is primarily engaged in the ownership, management, leasing, acquisition and redevelopment of shopping malls. The Company believes its distinctive real estate is at the forefront of enabling communities to flourish through the built environment by providing opportunities to create vibrant multi-use destinations. In general, our malls include carefully curated retail and lifestyle offerings, including national and regional department stores, large format retailers and other anchors, mixed with destination dining and entertainment experiences. In recent years, we have increased the portion of our mall properties that are leased to non-traditional mall tenants, including life sciences, healthcare, supermarkets and self-storage facilities. Approximately 29.4% of our mall space is committed to non-traditional tenants offering services such as dining and entertainment, health and wellness, off-price retail and fast fashion. The Company has executed several agreements to sell properties for anticipated multifamily and hotel uses.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    27


  COMPENSATION  

For purposes of determining compensation of our named executive officers, our Board of Trustees previously established specific goals for the Company and our key executives:executives designed to improve the Company’s portfolio quality improve the Company’sand operating results, strengthen the Company’s balance sheet and financial position, (lower leverage ratio under our credit facility, lower interest rates, higher liquidity) and position the Company for growth. These primary goals were in turn supported by a focus on and targeted progress in specific metrics, with strategic goals weighted towards continued portfolio improvement, progressing the Company’s densification and balance sheet strengthening plans, refinancing certain property mortgage loans, and expense management, all of which was focused on improving the Company’s liquidity position. Mr. Coradino communicated those goals to our employees and encouraged a collaborative effort among the departmentsteams within the Company fortowards the achievement of these goals.

In 2015,2021, Mr. Coradino and our key executives continued to execute the Company’s plan to achieve theseour goals in a challenging environment. Our net loss decreased by $130.8 million to a net loss of $135.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 from a net loss of $266.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, which primarily reflected an increase in lease revenue and a decrease in impairment loss on our Fashion District Philadelphia investment, partially offset by an increase in interest expense driven by higher interest rates and higher overall debt balances. Total Net Operating Income (“NOI”, a non-GAAP measure, discussed below) increased by approximately $42.0 million to NOI of $200.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to $158.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 mostly as a result of real estate revenue growth primarily driven by an increase in Same Store NOI primarily from higher percentage sales rents and a decrease in same store credit losses.

As evidenced by the significant progress madeCompensation Committee’s decisions and programs described in certain key achievementsmore detail below, the Compensation Committee believes that this quality executive management team demonstrated resilience, commitment and metrics:

dispositionstrength in light of two non-core mallsa very challenging operating environment and that the team’s strategic leadership and execution was critical to help advance the Company’s 50% interest in a third non-core property in 2015;strategic priorities.

FFO increased $6.8 million, or 5.3%; however, FFO as adjusted per share decreased 2.1%, primarily due to the issuance of 6,250,000 OP Units in connection with our acquisition of Springfield Town Center;

same store net operating income increased by 2.6%;

same store sales increased from $394 per square foot in 2014 to $435 per square foot in 2015, an increase of 8.5%;

a 6.0% increase in non-anchor lease renewal spreads over the prior rent;

the leverage ratio of the Company under its principal credit facility (the ratio of Total Liabilities to Gross Asset value, as defined therein) remained below the 50% level at 49.3%, as compared to 47.6% in 2014 and 48.4% in 2013, despite substantial borrowings in connection with the acquisition of Springfield Town Center;

continued reduction of our general and administrative expenses, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 2%, in 2015 as compared to 2014;

execution on our growth strategy through the acquisition of Springfield Town Center in Springfield, Virginia, which transaction was completed in the first quarter of 2015, and continued progress on the Company’s joint venture with The Macerich Company to redevelop The Gallery at Market East in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (to be known as the Fashion Outlets of Philadelphia); and

Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) of 39.5% for the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, which ranks in the 53rd percentile of the companies in the MSCI US REIT Index (that remained in the Index for the full three-year period).

As described in more detail below, thisthe Company’s goals and performance wasin the unprecedented operating environment, as well as the Company’s commitment to attract, retain and reward those members valuable to its team, were the basis for the decisions and programs of the Compensation Committee with respect to base salaries, annual incentive plan awards and long-term equityequity-based awards to the named executive officers. For example, given the Company’s operating performance for the year, the Compensation Committee determined that payouts under the Company’s annual incentive plan for 2015 should generally be made at the target level.

Executive Summary

The principal goals of the Compensation Committee are to ensure that the interests of our shareholders and our named executive officers are aligned and that our named executive officers are motivated to achieve established business objectives designed to maximize value for our shareholders. These goals are achieved in five principal ways: (i) setting fixed, base salaries so that the largest component of compensation of a named executive officer consists of equity and incentive compensation; (ii) emphasizing equity compensation as the principal form of compensation over cash compensation; (iii) conditioning the vesting of equity or equity-based compensation principally on relative TSR and/or continued service to PREIT; (iv) tying annual cash incentives to operating performance, as measured primarily, but not exclusively, by Funds From Operations (“FFO”) per share, and taking into consideration additional articulated performance metrics, the achievement of which are deemed important for reaching our strategic and business goals; and (v) 

1.

setting fixed base salaries so that the largest component of compensation of each named executive officer consists of equity and incentive compensation;

2.

emphasizing equity-based compensation as a principal form of compensation;

3.

conditioning the vesting of equity or equity-based compensation on corporate performance, including operating metrics, TSR and/or continued service to PREIT;

4.

tying annual cash incentives to operating performance, as measured by articulated performance metrics and strategic objectives, as the same may be adjusted by the Compensation Committee or the Board in response to events or transactions that make it, in light of the Company’s strategic objectives, appropriate to do so; and

5.

requiring named executive officers to own minimum stated amounts of our securities.

The Compensation Committee believes that long-term equity awards are particularly well-suited for aligning the interests of our shareholders and our named executive officers. Compensation in the form of equity earned over a multiple-year period helps to ensure that the named executive officers focus on long-term corporate performance that enhances the value of our shares over time. These objectives are further enhanced by our share retention guidelines, which require our executives to own meaningful amounts of our shares. Consistent with priorpast years, the 20152021 long-term equity program consisted of two components. The first component, which is performance based, consistedcomponents, with 50% of the grantaward being performance-based and 50% of restricted share units, orthe award being time-based. Named executive officers who receive shares upon settlement of RSUs that vest and under whichare required to hold those shares for a minimum of one year from the date such shares are issued based upon the TSR of PREIT during the three-year period ending December 31, 2017 relative to the TSR of companies in a broad REIT index. The second component consisted of restricted shares that generally vest in equal, annual installments over a three-year period, provided that the recipient of the restricted shares remains an employee on the vesting date. These time based restricted sharereceived.

28    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

2021 – 2023 Long-Term Equity Award Program

Component

Design/Purpose

Performance-Based

Restricted Share Units, or PSUs

PSUs vest, and a number of shares is earned, based upon PREIT’s performance in certain operating performance measures and a modification based on the TSR of PREIT over the three-year measurement period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the date of a change in control of PREIT. The TSR modifier depends on PREIT’s TSR performance over the measurement period relative to the TSR of other REITs comprising a leading index of retail REITs (the “Index REITs”).

Operating Performance Measures

•   The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by PREIT with respect to the PSUs awarded is based on a multiple determined by achievement of two equally-weighted operating performance measures — three-year core mall total occupancy and three-year corporate debt yield — during the measurement period.

TSR Modifier

•   The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by PREIT with respect to the PSUs awarded as determined under the operating performance goals will be adjusted, upwards or downwards, depending on PREIT’s TSR for the measurement period relative to the performance of the Index REITs.

Awards earned, if any, will be settled in the form of the Company’s common shares or in cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Time-Based

Restricted Share Units, or RSUs

RSUs granted vest in equal, annual installments over a three-year period, provided that the recipient of the restricted shares remains an employee on the vesting date. Upon each RSU vesting date, vested awards will be settled in the form of the Company’s common shares or in cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

These time-based RSU grants are intended to retain the services of the officers over the longer term by providing predictable awards for continued service.

Restricted Share Units with

Outperformance Units

(applicable to Mr. Coradino only)

In connection with entry into his amended and restated employment agreement, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Coradino a long-term incentive award of cash-settled, time-based RSUs that vest in three equal annual installments, provided that he remains an employee on the vesting date. Vested RSUs will be settled in cash equal to the fair market value of a common share on the applicable vesting date multiplied by the number of RSUs that vest on that date (less any required withholding). To the extent sufficient shares become available under a shareholder-approved Company equity plan, the Compensation Committee may at any time in its discretion convert this award to an award under that equity plan and settle the award in shares.

The RSUs also include an “outperformance multiplier” that would entitle Mr. Coradino to receive the dollar value of an additional number of common shares (“Outperformance Units”) tied to a multiple of the number of RSUs if the Company’s share price achieves certain outperformance goals. The share price will be measured based on the closing prices of a common share for the 60 days on which common shares were traded prior to and including the last day of a measurement period ending on December 31, 2023. No Outperformance Units will be earned if the share price is less than $4.00. If any amounts are earned in respect of the Outperformance Units at the end of the measurement period, they will be settled in cash based on the fair market value of a common share on the last day of the measurement period.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    29


  COMPENSATION  

The Compensation Committee believes that annual cash incentive opportunity awards further align the interests of our shareholders and our named executive officers by rewarding achievement of key operational goals. Except for Mr. Rubin, the 2015The 2021 annual cash incentive awards provided opportunities for the named executive officers to receive cash payments equal to varying percentages of their 2021 base salaries based primarily upon (i) the achievement of FFO per share relative to our 2015 business plan. The Compensation Committee hadcertain enumerated strategic goals, including portfolio improvement through anchor replacements and tenant diversification, progressing densification and redevelopment efforts, and improving the discretion to adjustCompany’s liquidity position, (ii) controlling capital expenditures (iii) growth in Same Store NOI, and (iv) a discretionary, qualitative assessment of the threshold, target and outperformance levels of FFO per share established under the awards if,NEOs’ performance in the judgmentaggregate. Each of the Compensation Committee, our reported FFO per share did not reflect our performance in 2015 in a manner consistent with the purposes of the cash incentive awards. The Compensation

Committee also had the discretion to take into account reported FFO per share as adjusted to exclude certain items that the Compensation Committee did not believe reflected the Company’s core operating performance. Although FFO per share was the primary factor for determining cash incentive compensation for 2015, it was not expected to be the sole factor, and the Compensation Committee had the discretion to consider other business performance factors, including growth in same store net operating income, the leverage ratio of the Company under its principal credit facility, occupancy costs as a percentage of tenant sales, return on assets, comparable store sales per square foot, in line occupancy, gross rent renewal spreads and the ratio of general and administrative costs to gross revenues, and to accord them such weight as the Compensation Committee deemed appropriate. Each of these other business performance factors relates to, and is indicative of, the achievement of at least one of the Company’s four key strategic objectives, of improving itsand is weighted towards continued portfolio quality, its operating resultsimprovement, progressing the Company’s densification and its balance sheet strengthening plans, refinancing certain property mortgage loans, and positioningexpense management, all of which was focused on improving the Company’s liquidity position. Mr. Coradino communicated those goals to our employees and encouraged a collaborative effort among the teams within the Company for growth. Intowards the caseachievement of Mr. Rubin, his 2015 cash incentive opportunity award was based upon his efforts in supporting Mr. Coradino and furthering the business goals of the Company.

While base salary increases for our continuing named executive officers ranged from 8.3% to 11.5% in 2015, with the largest increase being awarded to Mr. Coradino to reflect the nature of his role with the Company and his strong performance in that role, the Compensation Committee considered carefully the relative mix of base salary to other components of each executive officer’s compensation before awarding any increase. Mr. Ventresca’s salary increased by 19.6% in connection with his promotion to a more senior position with the Company and he is one of our named executive officers for the first time this year. The Compensation Committee also viewed each base salary increase as appropriate based on peer group and other data it reviewed.these goals.

The Compensation Committee believes that our compensation program has successfully aligned the interests of our shareholders with the interests of our named executive officers, as reflected by:

 

the emphasis on equityequity-based awards, combined with the requirement that equity received by the named executive officers under the awards be retained in accordance with share retention policies discussed later in this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”“Executive Compensation Overview” section;

 

the expiration of performance basedperformance-based equity awards without issuance of shares when relative TSR thresholds have not been achieved for the relevant measurement periods and, conversely, the issuance of shares in connection with achievement of long-term incentives when relative TSR thresholds have been achieved or exceeded;operating goals;

 

the grant of annual cash incentive opportunity awards based primarily upon FFO per share,on the core measureachievement of our operatingarticulated performance metrics and other business performance factors deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee andstrategic objectives approved by the Compensation Committee as related to the achievement of the Company’s business objectives;objectives, with the Compensation Committee or the Board having the ability to adjust those metrics in response to events or transactions that make it, in light of the Company’s strategic objectives, appropriate to do so; and

 

generally limiting base salary increases to modest amounts absent a significant change in responsibility and/or review of peer group data that suggest our base salaries may be set too low.

20152021 Voting Results for Advisory Approval of the Company’s Executive Compensation

At the 20152021 Annual Meeting, 93.3%approximately 81% of votes cast (not counting abstentions) were voted in favor of the Company’s executive compensation, while 4.9% of votes cast were voted against and 1.8% of votes cast abstained.compensation. While this vote is advisory, the Compensation Committee noted this shareholder support of its compensation policies.

The Compensation Committee has implemented certain changes to the 2022 annual incentive and long-term incentive programs. In particular, the 2022 annual incentive objectives include rigorous performance targets, including operating goals related to revenue generation, improving portfolio quality and controlling expenses, as well as goals for completing asset and land sales in furtherance of liquidity and densification goals. Furthermore, the 2022 – 2024 long-term incentive program includes a performance-based component under which awards would be earned based on achievement of operating performance measures of core mall sales per square foot, average quarterly core mall total occupancy and debt yield ratio, with the potential for the award’s size to be modified upward or downward based on the Company’s TSR over the measurement period relative to the performance of other leading retail real estate investment trusts. The changes implemented in 2022 are designed to incentivize management to achieve the Company’s strategic objectives, in particular, to improve the Company’s liquidity and strengthen the Company’s balance sheet and financial flexibility.

30    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

Aspects of Compensation Program Favorable from a Corporate Governance Perspective

The Committee believes that the executive compensation program includes aspects that align the interests of our shareholders and those of the named executive officers and excludes aspects that could misalign their interests.

 

What We Do

 

What We Don’t Do

 

  We align pay with Company performance. LongFifty percent (50%) of long term performance basedincentives are delivered in performance-based equity awards are tied to relativecorporate performance, including TSR, and annual performance basedperformance-based cash awardsincentives are tied to key operationalperformance metrics and financial metrics.strategic objectives.

 

  We require named executive officers to maintain share ownership and retain shares received under equity plans. Our CEOChief Executive Officer must own common shares having a value of 5 times5x his salary and our other named executive officers must own common shares having a value of 3 times2x their respective salaries; named executive officers must hold a portion of any equity plan shares they receive for at least one year.

 

  Upon a change of control, we require a double-trigger (meaning, in addition to a change of control of the Company, the executive must be timely terminated without cause or resign for good reason) in our employment agreements before agreed upon cash severance benefits or payments are paid.

 

  We review data derived from our peer group of companies and the REIT industry when making executive compensation decisions.

 

  We consider carefully how compensation program design and decisions affect risk-taking by named executive officers.

 

  We authorize the Board to recoup (“clawback”) executive compensation that resulted from a misstatement of financial results caused by such executive’s intentional misconduct or fraud.

 

  Our Compensation Committee engages an outside independent compensation consulting firm to advise on executive compensation matters.

  

 

•    ×We prohibit hedging and strongly discourage pledging transactions by our non-employee trustees and executive officers.

 

×  We do not provide any material perquisites.

 

×  We do not reprice options without shareholder approval.

 

•    ×Our compensation consultant engaged by our Compensation Committee does not permit its compensation consultant to provide any other services to the Company.

Compensation Committee Process and General Considerations

The Compensation Committee devoted a substantial portion of sixall of its meetings in 20152021 to executive compensation for that year. In addition, the Compensation Committee has met threenine times in 20162022 to discuss payment of cash incentive opportunity awards for 20152021 and establish compensation for 2016.2022. The Compensation Committee considered, among other matters:

 

the objectives and policies of its compensation programs for 20152021 and later years;years, including the executive team’s performance in addressing the challenges faced in 2021 and in past years and the desire to ensure continuity and stability in the near term;

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    31


  COMPENSATION  

 

the design of the annual cash incentive and long-term incentive programs in light of the principal objective of aligning the interests of our shareholders and our named executive officers by rewarding outcomes that further the interests of our shareholders;

 

the historical performance of the Company, as measured by TSR, and its impact on the payout of long-term equity incentive awards;

information on compensation of senior executives at other companies derived from industry surveys and proxy statements for prior years for a group of 1715 REITs deemed comparable to PREIT for this purpose;

 

the amounts of the base salaries to be paid and annual cash incentive opportunity and long-term equity awards to be granted to our named executive officers for 20152021 and the allocation among these components; and

 

the Company’s guidance rangestrategic goals for its 2015 FFO per share2021 and its goals for certain supplemental corporate performance factors, and the Company’s achievements in relation to such FFO guidance and other performance factors.achievement of those goals.

In setting 20152021 compensation, the Compensation Committee also considered our performance during 2014 in view of2020 compared to the financial goals set forth under our 20142020 business plan, which was approved by the Board of Trustees. In addition, the Compensation Committee also solicited and considered the recommendations of Mr. Coradino regarding the components and amounts of compensation to be paid to the named executive officers (other than Mr. Coradino) in 2015.

As a part of its annual review of PREIT’s compensation policies with respect to all employees, the Compensation Committee also evaluates the risks that are created by those policies, including the risk-taking incentives that those policies may create. Based on that review, the Compensation Committee has concluded that its compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on PREIT.2021.

Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee was assisted in its work by an independent compensation consultant, Pay Governance, LLC. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to engage (and replace) an executive compensation consultant. In addition to consulting on executive compensation matters, the compensation consultant may be engaged by the Compensation Committee for special projects. All of the work performed by the compensation consultant in 20152021 related to executive officer compensation. Mr. Goldman, in his capacity as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel,Coradino meets with the Compensation Committee and separately with the compensation consultant on matters relating to the compensation of the named executive officers.

Compensation Consultant Independence

The policies and procedures of Pay Governance, LLC and certain additional facts, including those set forth below, give the Compensation Committee confidence that the advice it receives from Pay Governance, LLC is

objective and not influenced by any relationships that Pay Governance, LLC or its affiliates may have with the Company, its Board of Trustees or its management. These policies, procedures and other facts include the following:

 

Pay Governance, LLC does not provide any other services to the Company;

 

the fees that Pay Governance, LLC receives from the Company are less than 1% of the total revenues of Pay Governance, LLC;

 

the lead consultant from Pay Governance, LLC does not have any business or personal relationship with any member of the Compensation Committee or any executive officer of the Company;

 

the lead consultant from Pay Governance, LLC does not own any Company securities and is prohibited from doing so by the policies of Pay Governance, LLC;

 

Pay Governance, LLC has direct access to the Compensation Committee without management intervention and will only provide services at the direction of the Compensation Committee or in support of its charter; and

 

Pay Governance, LLC will notify the Compensation Committee if the lead consultant provides consulting services to another company where an affiliation exists with a member of management or a member of the Compensation Committee. In this regard, Pay Governance, LLC did advise the Compensation Committee that it performs services for Brandywine Realty Trust. Mr. Pizzi, one of our trustees and a member of our Compensation Committee, is also a trustee of Brandywine Realty Trust, but our Compensation Committee did not believe this impacted the independence of Pay Governance, LLC.

32    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Pay Governance, LLC pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Pay Governance, LLC from serving as an independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee.

Comparative Peer GroupsGroup

The compensation consultant periodically informs the Compensation Committee of developing compensation trends and programs among REITs and other public companies. The compensation consultant also presents data on executive compensation from several sources, including a proprietary survey of executive compensation among REITs prepared for the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”),NAREIT, and proxy statements of a group of REITs (the “peer group”) deemed comparable to PREIT. The peer group for 20152021 compensation purposes consisted of 1715 retail REITs located throughout the United States, many of which own and operate retail properties, although the peer group also included office, industrial, multi-family and diversified REITs.States. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the compensation consultant and management, updates the peer group periodically. The Compensation Committee made no changes toOne company, Taubman Centers, was removed from the peer group for purposes of compensation deliberations for 2015. Thedue to its acquisition by Simon Property Group, which closed in December 2020. As a result, the 2021 peer group consisted of the following 15 retail-specific REITs: Brandywine Realty Trust, CBL & Associates Properties, Corporate Office Properties Trust, Cousins Properties Incorporated, Equity One, Inc., Federal Realty Investment Trust, Glimcher Realty Trust, Liberty Property Trust, Macerich Company, PS Business Parks, Inc., Regency Centers Corp., Rouse Properties, Inc., Saul Centers, Inc., Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc., Taubman Centers, Inc., Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and Weingarten Realty Investors. For 2016, the Compensation Committee, after consulting with Pay Governance, LLC, resolved to add three companies to the peer group, Acadia Realty Trust, Kite Realty Group Trust and Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust. The Compensation Committee found that the addition of these three smaller companies, would result in the Company being closer to the middle of the peer group in terms of revenue.

Acadia Realty Trust

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Federal Realty Group Trust

Kite Realty Group Trust

Macerich Company

Retail Opportunity Investments Corp

Retail Properties of America, Inc.

RPT Realty

Saul Centers, Inc.

Seritage Growth Properties

Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc.

Urban Edge Properties

Washington Prime Group Inc.

Weingarten Realty Investors

In determining compensation for 2015,2021, the Compensation Committee compared (i) the total 20142020 compensation of the named executive officers to the total compensation paid to the executive officers in the peer group as reported in their 20142020 proxy statements and in other sources and (ii) the allocation of total compensation of the named executive officers among base salary and cash incentive and equity awards to the allocation of such

compensation among base salary and cash incentive and equity awards as reported in the proxy statements for the companies in the peer group and in other sources. The Compensation Committee also compared PREIT’s FFO growth rate, TSR and other business performance metrics to the FFO growth rate, TSR and other business performance metrics of the peer group companies. NAREIT defines FFO, which is a non-GAAP measure commonly used by REITs, as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains and losses on sales of operating properties, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. TSR is a measure of the financial return to shareholders over a specified measurement period. The financial return consists of dividends on a share of common equity during the period (which are deemed to be reinvested in shares when paid) plus (or minus) the increase (or decrease) in the market value of a share measured from the beginning to the end of the period.

The comparative compensation data provided background for assessing both the competitiveness of our compensation and the appropriate allocation between the elements of compensation. The Compensation Committee deemed the peer group comparisons to be more relevant to its compensation decisions than the proprietary NAREIT survey provided by the compensation consultant because it is a smaller comparison group that is more similar to the Company in terms of total capitalization, revenues, number of properties, number of employees, geographic location and other business characteristics and pertinent factors, including whether the peer company served the retail industry. The Compensation Committee does not set specific competitive pay targets or objectives, or otherwise engage in formal “benchmarking” of the individual components of compensation paid to the named executive officers against executives at peer group companies. The Compensation Committee does, however, generally try to set total compensation, including compensation in the form

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    33


  COMPENSATION  

of performance basedperformance-based awards, for the named executive officers near the middle of the peer group data for their respective positions. The awards are designed to allow for the possibility of greater or lesser compensation based upon our performance.

The Compensation Committee also considers special or unusual matters that affect the metrics used to measure corporate or operational performance for purposes of the performance basedperformance-based elements of compensation. Such matters can directly affect FFO and indirectly affect TSR, the two primary metrics used in the performance based awards. In addition, the Compensation Committee may take into consideration other business performance factors in determining the amount of the payout under the cash incentive opportunity awards. Such other business performance factors may also provide a context for evaluating our FFO performance.

As part of its deliberations, especially with respect to the weighting given to the various components of compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed internally-prepared tally sheets for each named executive officer. Each of these tally sheets presented the dollar amount of each component of each named executive officer’s compensation, as well as potential payments under various performance, termination and change of control scenarios.

Role of Our Executive Officers in Executive Compensation

As previously noted, Mr. Coradino, with assistance from our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Mr. Goldman, and after consultation with other senior officers, made 20152021 compensation recommendations for our officers, including the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee discussed these recommendations with Mr. Coradino and invited him to participate in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations concerning compensation for the named executive officers, other than Mr. Coradino.

Compensation Objectives and Policies

The principal objectives of our compensation program are to ensure that the interests of our shareholders and the interests of our named executive officers are aligned and that our named executive officers are motivated to achieve established business objectives in order to maximize shareholder value. Our compensation program

for 20152021 consisted of three primary elements: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash incentive opportunity; and (iii) equityequity-based awards under a long-term incentive program. Our 2021 compensation program also included cash retention bonuses, which would only be earned and paid in 2022. These three elements are designed to contain an appropriate level and mix of compensation that emphasizes performance basedperformance-based compensation and equity to align the interests of our shareholders and our named executive officers and, if performance isgoals are achieved, to provide the officers with an opportunity for wealth creation. We also seek to motivate and to retain the named executive officers by providing a competitive level of base salary and time based restricted sharestime-based RSU awards to encourage them to stay with the Company by having a mechanism to impose an opportunity cost for departing. In an effort to effectively incentivize and retain employees in light of the unprecedented challenges faced by the Company in 2020 and the continuing challenging environment and competitive talent market in 2021, the Board approved special cash retention bonuses for certain employees in 2021 to be earned and payable in equal installments in April and December 2022.

34    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

The express linkage of program elements to specified operating goals, Same Store NOI growth, and capital expenditure control (as measures of short-term performance as part of our annual cash incentive program), and core mall total occupancy, corporate debt yield and relative TSR and FFO and other key operating(as measures of long-term performance metrics,associated with performance-based equity-based RSU compensation), combined with an established share retention policy for the named executive officers, results in a layered approach intended to balance achievement of short-term operating objectives with longer termlonger-term value creation for our shareholders. FFO is used as the primary, but not sole, measure of short-term performance associated with our cash incentive opportunity awards, and relative TSR is used as the sole measure of long-term performance associated with performance based equity-based compensation. The mix of the compensation components as set forth in the 20152021 Summary Compensation Table on page 4044 is shown below for the Chief Executive Officer and on an aggregate basis for the Chief Executive Officer and theother named executive officers. This does not include any special cash retention component that could be earned and paid in 2022.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Components of Executive Compensation

Base Salary

Base salaries are intended to (i) be competitive with companies in the peer group, (ii) provide the named executive officers with a fixed and predictable source of income, and (iii) assure that the named executive officers remain committed to PREIT even when conditions do not permit the achievement of performance goals.

For 2015, Mr. Coradino’s salary increased by $75,000, or approximately 11.5%, and Mr. Rubin’s salary was increased by $25,000, which the Compensation Committee felt was appropriate in light of the continued transition of their respective roles, as well as the performance of Mr. Coradino as our CEO. Mr. Goldman’s salary increased by approximately 10.0%, which the Compensation Committee felt was appropriate in light of Mr. Goldman’s expanding role at the Company and his performance in that role. The Compensation Committee

Name

  2020 Salary   2021 Salary 

 

Joseph C. Coradino

  

 

$

 

850,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

900,000

 

 

 

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

  

 

$

 

450,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

490,000

 

 

 

Joseph Aristone

  

 

$

 

400,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

425,000

 

 

 

Heather Crowell

  

 

$

 

400,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

410,000

 

 

 

Andrew M. Ioannou

  

 

$

 

400,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

425,000

 

 

 

Lisa M. Most

  

 

$

 

400,000

 

 

  

 

$

 

410,000

 

 

similarly approved a 10.0% increase in 2015 base salary for Mr. McCadden, and also approved an increase of $50,000, or 19.6%, in 2015 base salary for Mr. Ventresca. The Compensation Committee viewed allapproved increases to the named executive officers’ base salaries from 2020 to 2021. The Compensation Committee determined these increases asto be appropriate based on the Company’s performance in 2020 and on peer group and other data it reviewed, to improve the competitive positioning of the salary component relative to the peer group, especially in light of the challenging operating environment, the increase in such named executive officers’ duties, and itthe desire for internal pay equity. The Compensation Committee believed the increases

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    35


  COMPENSATION  

in base salary that were awarded did not disrupt the proper allocation of compensation between fixed base salaries and shortshort- and long termlong-term incentive compensation. Mr. Ventresca entered into an employment agreement amendment in 2021 that provided for a salary increase in 2022.

Cash Incentive Compensation

FFO and Corporate Performance Factors in General.

Each named executive officer was eligible to receive annual cash incentive compensation equal to a specified percentage of his 2015the executive’s 2021 base salary. The Compensation Committee considers FFO per share to beestablished targets for the primary corporate performance factor, but it also may consider supplemental corporate performance factors,2021 annual incentive compensation based on (i) the achievement of certain enumerated operating goals, including portfolio improvement through anchor replacements and tenant diversification, progressing densification and redevelopment efforts, and improving the Company’s liquidity position, (ii) controlling capital expenditures (iii) growth in same store net operating income, the leverage ratioSame Store NOI, and (iv) a discretionary, qualitative assessment of the Company under its principal credit facility, occupancy costsNEOs’ performance as a percentage of tenant sales, return on assets, comparable store sales per square foot, in line occupancy, gross rent renewal spreads and the ratio of general and administrative costs to gross revenues.group. The Compensation Committee also retained the discretion to adjust the threshold, target and outperformance levels of FFO per share established under the awards if, in its judgment, the Company’s reported FFO per share did not reflect its performance in a manner consistent with the purpose of the awards. The Compensation Committee also had the discretion to take into account FFO per share as adjusted to exclude certain itemsplan contemplates that the Compensation Committee did not believe reflectedmay adjust these metrics if there are events or transactions that make it, in light of the Company’s core operating performance.strategic objectives, appropriate to do so.

20152021 Annual Incentive Opportunity Awards.Awards

For each of the named executive officers, other than Mr. Rubin, 100%85% of their 2015the NEO’s 2021 cash incentive opportunity award was determined bytied to the corporate performance of the Company based upon FFO per sharethe articulated performance metrics and strategic objectives established by the other factors underCompensation Committee. The remaining 15% of the awards. For Mr. Rubin, his 20152021 cash incentive opportunity award was based upon his efforts in supporting Mr. Coradino and furthering the business goals of the Company.

Having the annual cash incentive opportunity awards for all of the named executive officers except Mr. Rubin depend solely on corporate performance is intendedtied to encourage teamwork. FFO was selected as the primary measure of short-term corporate performance because it is the most commonly used measure of operating performance among REITs and is a key driver of shareholder value. The decision to focus on corporate performance reflects the view that the named executive officers have the greatest ability to influence operating performance and that a substantial portion of their compensation, therefore, should be based upon FFO per share, as adjusted when appropriate, and other enumerated performancediscretionary, qualitative factors.

The 20152021 annual cash incentive opportunity awards were designed to motivate the named executive officers to achieve the objectives of the 20152021 business plan that was prepared by management and approved by the Board of Trustees.Trustees and is intended to encourage teamwork among the executive team. The opportunity amounts were expressed in the awards as threshold, target and outperformance levels. If FFO per share and other corporate performance metrics had been below the threshold level, no incentive compensation would have been paid for corporate performance. If FFO per share and other corporate performance metrics had been between the threshold and target levels or between the target and outperformance levels, the amount of the incentive compensation would be determined on a proportionate basis. If FFO per share and other corporate performance metrics had been above the outperformance level, the amount of incentive compensation would have been paid at the outperformance level. The potential incentive compensation for 20152021 for the named executive officers was equal to the following percentages of their 2021 base salaries.

 

   Threshold  Target  Outperformance 

Joseph F. Coradino

   50  125  200

Ronald Rubin

   50  100  200

Robert F. McCadden

   40  80  160

Bruce Goldman

   40  80  160

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

   30  60  120

    Threshold  Target  Outperformance 

 

Joseph F. Coradino

  

 

 

 

87.5

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

 

 

350

 

 

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

  

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

90

 

 

 

 

 

180

 

 

All other named executive officers

  

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

120

 

2015 FFO Target, Corporate Performance Factors and 2015 Performance.2021 Performance

At the beginning of 2015,2021, the Compensation Committee established the following weightings and targets for the performance factors:

 

Metric

 

 

Weighting

 

 

Performance Target

 

 

Actual

 

 

Weighted

Contribution

to Bonus

     

Operating Goals

(20 specific strategic goals)

 25% 

11 of 20

(Threshold — 8 of 20; Outperformance —14 of 20)

 14 of 20 50%
    
Capital Expenditures Control 30% 

$31 million

(Threshold — $34 million; Outperformance —$28 million)

 Less than $28 million 60%
     
Same Store NOI Growth** 30% 

8%

(Threshold — 6%; Outperformance — 14%)

 14% 60%
    
Discretionary 15% Qualitative Assessment Below target 5%
  
Composite Weighted Achievement of Performance Metrics 175%

**

NOI and Same Store NOI are non-GAAP financial measures that are derived from real estate revenue (determined in accordance with GAAP, including lease termination revenue), minus property operating expenses (determined in accordance with GAAP), plus our pro rata share of revenue and property operating expenses of our unconsolidated partnership investments. NOI does not represent cash

36    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net loss (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our financial performance or to be an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity. It is not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. We believe NOI is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it is an indicator of the return on property investment and provides a method of comparing property performance over time. We believe that net loss is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI excludes other income, general and administrative expenses, provision for employee separation expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, insurance recoveries, gain/loss on debt extinguishment, gain on derecognition of property, impairment of assets, equity in loss/income of partnerships, loss on remeasurement of assets by equity method investee, gain on sale of non-operating real estate, gain/loss on sale of real estate, project costs and other expenses and reorganization expenses. Same Store NOI is calculated using retail properties owned for the full periods presented and excludes properties acquired or disposed of, under redevelopment, or designated as non-core during the periods presented. For a reconciliation of NOI to net income (loss) for 2021, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 at pages 56-57.

The 2021 Annual Incentive Plan objectives included 20 operating goals. The Compensation Committee set the target range for FFOperformance goal at $1.82 to $1.87 per diluted share, which was consistent with the range of our 2015 FFO guidance announced on February 17, 2015. The FFO per share goals were approved with the expectation that there would be a high probability of achieving the threshold, a likelihood of achieving the target and a modest probability of achieving the outperformance level. The Compensation Committee also decided that there should be an approximately 5.0% spread between the mid-point of the target level range and each of the threshold and outperformance levels. Accordingly, the threshold and outperformance levels were set at $1.75 per diluted share and $1.94 per diluted share, respectively. As detailed in the Company’s press release announcing its initial 2015 guidance, the FFO per share goals assumed no extraordinary events, such as asset sales or acquisitions, executive separation costs, or losses on hedge ineffectiveness from the early repayment of certain mortgage loans. As such types of items are inherently unpredictable, the Compensation Committee believes it is more appropriate to retain some discretion to adjust the FFO per share targets up or down to account for such items rather than to be firmly locked into FFO targets that do not reflect the effects of decisions that the Board of Trustees believes are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders but that adversely affect FFO per share in the period when the event occurs.

The Compensation Committee also took notice of enumerated corporate performance factors other than FFO per share, such as growth in same store net operating income, leverage and occupancy costs as a percentage of tenant sales, among other things. Although no specific numerical thresholds were established with respect to such factors as part of the awards, numeric performance goals were established for each performance factor and the Compenation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance against these goals. The Committee did not assign a specific relative weight to be accorded to these other corporate performance factors.

In February 2016, the Company reported 2015 FFO per diluted share of $1.79. The Compensation Committee noted that FFO per share was negatively impacted by approximately $0.085 per share resulting from (i) dilution resulting from the disposition of non-core malls and other properties; (ii) the provision for employee separation expense, (iii) expenses associated with the early repayment of debt in 2015, (iv) costs associated with the acquisition of Springfield Town Center; and (v) the public disclosure of modifications to Company earning’s guidance throughout the year to reflect the impacts11 of these items. All20 goals. After a thorough review of the dispositions, acquisitions and related costs are central to the Company’s stated goal of improving the quality of its portfolio, and the Compensation Committee believed that such transactions that are expected to be positive in the long term should not negatively impact the evaluation of the Company’s operating metrics under the annual incentive program in the given year in which they occur. Accordingly,2021 performance, the Compensation Committee determined that 14 of these goals were achieved, equating to lower the FFO per share target rangeoutperformance level attainment. The achieved goals included:

achieving portfolio improvement through opening and signing or closing key transactions for 2015 to $1.72 to $1.81 per share, andanchor replacements;

progressing the Company’s FFO per sharedensification and balance sheet strengthening plans by securing multifamily entitlements and anchor approvals for 2015 of $1.79 fell within that revised target range. multifamily projects;

refinancing certain property mortgage loans; and

improving our ESG performance.

The Compensation Committee also considered the Company’s achievements with respect to the principal corporate performance factors otherestablished a capital expenditure control target goal of expenditures of no more than FFO per share, including the growth in$31 million and same store NOI (2.6%), maintenancegrowth of bank leverage (49.3%) below the Company’s target8%. Actual capital expenditures of less than $28 million and actual same store NOI growth in excess of 14% in 2021 equated to outperformance level of 50%, the increse in sales per square foot ($432), and a 6.0% increase in renewal spreads. Based on the Company’s results in terms of FFO per share and the other corporate performance factors,attainment for these components.

Lastly, the Committee concludeddetermined that the Company’s performance reflected a strong year, with significant progress toward executing the strategic business plan.

The following table reflects the changes madediscretionary component should be paid at 5% (below target) due to the target FFO levels and the Company’s actual performance for 2015:

   Threshold   Low End of
Target Range
   Actual   High End of
Target Range
   Outperformance 

FFO per share

  $1.75    $1.82      $1.87    $1.94  

Revised FFO per share

  $1.68    $1.72      $1.81    $1.85  

FFO per share (actual)

      $1.79      

Annual Incentive Plan Payments. As a result of the determinations by the Committee summarized above, the cash incentive payments for 2015 based on FFO and the other corporate performance factors were made at the target level and were (i) $906,250 to Mr. Coradino, (ii) $387,774 to Mr. McCadden, and (iii) $303,554 to Mr. Goldman. Mr. Ventresca’s payment included payment at target of $183,001, plus additional discretionary bonus of $166,999. In approving Mr. Ventresca’s discretionary bonus, the Compensation Committee took particular note of the Company’s continued progress in disposing of non-core assets. Beyond the Company’s strong relative TSR performance and growth in FFO per share, the Compensation Committee noted the Company’s solid performance across the range of operating metrics noted above, as well as the improvementsdecline in the Company’s portfolio resulting from the dispositionshare price.

Based upon a review of certain non-core assets,our operating performance and the possibilities for future growth created through the acquisition of Springfield Town Center in Springfield, Virginiastrategic accomplishments and the joint venture redevelopment of The Gallery at Market East in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The following table summarizes the annual incentive plan amounts paid to Messrs. Coradino, McCadden, Goldman and Ventresca with respect to 2015:

   2015 Salary   Target
Bonus %
  Bonus Paid 

Joseph F. Coradino

  $725,000     125 $906,250  

Robert F. McCadden

  $484,718     80 $387,774  

Bruce Goldman

  $379,442     80 $303,554  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.(1)

  $305,001     60 $350,000  

(1)As noted above, Mr. Vesntresca’s bonus included payment at target of $183,001, and an additional descretionary component of 166,999.

Mr. Rubin’s annual cash incentive opportunity award for 2015 was based upon his efforts in supporting Mr. Coradino and furthering the business goals of the Company. Based on the Company’s success in 2015,overall NEO performance, the Compensation Committee determined to award Mr. Rubinannual cash incentive compensationawards at 175% of target for 2015 at 100% of2021. The following table summarizes the target level, or $325,000.actual annual incentive plan and other bonus amounts paid to Messrs. Coradino, Ventresca, Aristone, and Ioannou, and Mses. Crowell and Most with respect to 2021 performance.

    2021 Salary   

Target Bonus

as Percent

of Salary

  

Actual Bonus as a

Percentage of

Target Bonus

  

Actual Bonus as
Percentage of

Salary Based on
Performance

  

2021 Annual

Incentive

Plan Bonus

 

Joseph F. Coradino

  $900,000    175  175  306 $2,756,242 

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

  $490,000    90  175  157 $771,748 

Joseph J. Aristone

  $425,000    60  175  105 $446,249 

Heather Crowell

  $410,000    60  175  105 $430,499 

Andrew M. Ioannou

  $425,000    60  175  105 $446,249 

Lisa M. Most

  $410,000    60  175  105 $430,499 

Long TermLong-Term Incentive Awards

Since 2002, long term compensationOur 2021 long-term incentive program (the “2021 LTIP”) awards to our named executive officers have consisted solelyconsist of equity (exceptequity-based awards delivered fifty percent (50%) in 2009), divided evenly between performance basedperformance-based equity awards in the form of PSUs and time basedfifty percent (50%) in time-based equity awards.awards in the form of RSUs.

LOGO     Restricted2022 Proxy Statement    37


  COMPENSATION  

Performance Share Units (“RSUs”(PSUs)

Fifty percent (50%). One-half of the total value of the 20152021 long term compensation awards was granted in the form of RSUs.performance-based PSUs. Under the 2015 RSU Program,2021 LTIP, an account is established for each named executive officer as of the grant date and is credited with a base number of RSUsPSUs, which was computed by dividing the stated value of the award by the 20 day20-day average of the closing prices of a share of PREIT through the day preceding the grant date. Amounts equal to the dividends paid on an equivalent number of shares held as of the applicable record date before the end of the three-year measurement period are deemed to be invested in additional RSUs. ThePSUs, which additional PSUs are subject to the same performance vesting and payment terms as the original PSUs.

PSUs vest, and a number of shares is earned, with respect tobased upon PREIT’s performance in certain operating performance measures and a modification based on the RSU award will depend uponTSR of PREIT over the achievementthree-year measurement period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2023 or the date of a change in control of PREIT. The TSR formodifier depends on PREIT’s TSR performance over the measurement period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 at specified levels relative to the TSR of component companiesthe Index REITS.

Awards earned, if any, will be settled in the MSCI US REIT Index (the “Index”). This Index reflectsform of the total returnCompany’s common shares or in cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Operating Performance Measures

The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by PREIT with respect to the shareholdersPSUs awarded is based on a multiple determined by achievement of a broad cross section of publicly-held U.S. REITs. TSR was selected as the sole metric for the RSUs because TSR directlytwo operating performance measures the financial return to shareholders over a specified period. As a result, these awards to named executive officers are directly aligned with the long-term economic interests of our shareholders.

The RSUs either vest or expire without the issuance of any shares at the end of the measurement period. A specified percentage of the RSUs in each account on that date will be converted into shares of PREIT and delivered to the named executive officer if the TSR of PREIT forduring the measurement period, equalsconsisting of the three-year core mall total occupancy and corporate debt yield metrics, which are each weighted 50%. For all participants, the threshold performance level will have a 0.5 multiplier, the target performance level will have a 1.0 multiplier and the maximum performance level will have a 2.0 multiplier.

TSR Modifier

If PREIT’s TSR performance over the measurement period is equal to or exceedsbelow the 25th percentile of the companies inIndex REITs, then 80% of the preliminary number of shares will be earned.

If PREIT’s TSR during the measurement period is equal to or above the 25th percentile of the Index REITs, then a number of shares ranging from 80% (at the 25th percentile) up to 120% (at the 75th percentile and greater) of the preliminary number of shares will be earned, as determined by linear interpolation.

The use of performance operating measures as well as TSR modifier is intended to strengthen the connection between pay and performance, improve the retention aspect of these awards from prior PSU programs that used TSR as the only performance measure, and to appropriately reward executives for the same measurement period. If TSR does not equal at leastachievement of long-term performance all while tying the

25th percentile ultimate award to the relative share performance of the companies in the Index during the measurement period, the named executive officer’s entire account associated with that measurement period will expire without the issuance of anyCompany’s common shares. If TSR is equalthe Company fails to or aboveachieve the 25th percentile of companies in the Index during the measurement period, the RSUs (including RSUs resulting from reinvestment of amounts equal to dividends) will vest andperformance operating targets, there will be issued a numberno payout under the awards, regardless of shares ranging from 50% up to a maximum of 150% (at or above the 75th percentile of companies in the Index) of the number of RSUs. In the event of a change of control, the measurement period for any outstanding RSU Program would end on the date of the change of control, and shares will become payable under those awards, if at all, based on our relative TSR performance through that date.performance.

RSUs also expire without the issuance of any shares if, during the measurement period,If a named executive officer’s employment is terminated for “cause” or voluntarily by the named executive officer without “good reason,” as those terms are defined in the named executive officer’s employment agreement. RSUs will not expire without the issuance of any shares in the event of the termination of a named executive officer’s employment by PREIT without “cause” or by the named executive officer for “good reason,” or in the event of termination of employment due to “disability”disability or death, as those terms are defined in such named executive officer’s employment agreement. Under such circumstances, the RSUsPSUs will remain outstanding and will vest or expire without the issuance of any shares (or cash as the same may be) based on the actual achievement of the operating performance measures and relative TSR as determined at the end of the relevant measurement period, as if the named executive officer had remained an employee.employee through the end of the measurement period. If the PSUs vest, the departed employee would receive shares or cash in settlement of the award after completion of the measurement period at the same time as other plan participants.

Restricted Shares.Share Units (RSUs)

The restricted shares awarded toremaining fifty percent (50%) of the named executive officerstotal value of the 2021 long term compensation awards was granted in 2015 generallythe form of RSUs that vest in three equal installments on or about February 15, 2016, 2017March 31, 2022, 2023 and 2018,2024, as long as the named executive officer remains an employee on the vesting date. The named executive officers are entitled to receive an amount in cash equalDuring the period that the RSUs have not vested, the holder will have no rights as a shareholder with respect to the amount ofRSUs, however, dividends, that wouldif any, on the Company’s common shares are deemed to be paid with respect to RSUs and credited to the RSU accounts and applied to “acquire” more RSUs for the account of the Executive Officer at the 20-day average closing price per common share ending on unvested time based restricted shares. While the shares remain unvested, this amount is treateddividend payment date. Upon the RSU vesting date, awards, including the additional RSUs “acquired” as compensation and is deducted from incomedividend equivalent credits during the vesting period, will be settled in the calculationform of earnings per share.the Company’s common shares or cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

38    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

The use of time based restricted sharestime-based RSUs is designed to retain the services of a named executive officer by providing a predictable award for continued service and creating a potentially significant cost to the named executive officer if he were to terminate his employment voluntarily. Moreover, sincebecause the award consists of shares which vest over a period of years, the economic interests of the executive in maintaining and enhancing the value of the shares are aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders.

All unvested RSUs awarded to a participant become fully vested upon a change of control of PREIT. If the Participant’s employment terminates on account of the participant’s death or disability, any otherwise unvested RSUs will become fully vested and the participant (or the participant’s beneficiary(ies), if applicable) will be eligible to receive Shares (or cash, if applicable) in respect of the participant’s RSUs.

Vesting of restricted sharesRSUs that vest based on the passage of time accelerates for Mr. Coradino in the event of a termination of his employment six months before or 12 months after a “change in control,” in the event of control” ofa termination by PREIT without “cause,” upon Mr. Coradino’s death or termination due to “disability”, or in a termination of employment by Mr. Coradino for “good reason,” as each of those terms is defined in his employment agreement. The vesting schedules of RSUs is detailed more fully below (see “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Termination or Change of Control Arrangements” beginning on page 46). Unvested RSUs also vest for Mr. Coradino in the named executive officer’sevent of termination of employment due to death or disability. Vesting of RSUs accelerate for Mr. Ventresca in the event of a termination of his employment by PREIT without “cause,” or a termination of employment by the named executive officerMr. Ventresca for “good reason,” as each of thethose terms is defined in thehis employment agreement.

Restricted Share Units with Outperformance Units (Mr. Coradino)

In connection with entry into Mr. Coradino’s amended and restated employment agreement in May 2021, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Coradino a long-term incentive award of suchcash-settled, time-based RSUs that vest in three equal annual installments, subject to continued employment (and to accelerated vesting under his amended and restated employment agreement upon certain termination events, as described below in “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements” beginning on page 45). Vested RSUs will be settled in cash equal to the fair market value of a common share on the applicable vesting date multiplied by the number of RSUs that vest on that date (less any required withholding). The Company had previously granted performance-based PSUs and time-based RSUs to the Company’s executives in March 2021, but no time-based award had been granted to Mr. Coradino at that time. Between his March 2021 award of PSUs and May 2021 award of RSUs, Mr. Coradino’s 2021 long-term incentive opportunity is 50% performance based and 50% time-based.

Mr. Coradino’s RSUs also include an “outperformance multiplier” that would entitle Mr. Coradino to receive the dollar value of an additional number of shares tied to a multiple of the number of RSUs if the Trust’s share price achieves certain outperformance goals, as follows:

Level of
Achievement of
Share Price
Performance
Multiplier(1)

Outperformance

$   6.25 or more1.25x

Above-Target

$                5.501.00x

Target

$                4.750.75x

Threshold

$                4.000.50x

Below Threshold

< $                4.000.00x

No outperformance payment will be made if the share price is less than $4.00. The performance multiplier for achievement between levels will be determined by linear interpolation. Achievement of the share price goals will be measured based on the average of the closing prices of our shares for the 60 days on which our shares were traded prior to and including the last day of a measurement period ending on December 31, 2023 (or upon the occurrence of certain earlier change in control events). If any amounts are earned at the end of the measurement period, those amounts will be settled in cash based on the fair market value of a share on the last day of the measurement period.

2019 – 2021 RSU Payouts

In 2019, the executives were granted performance-based RSUs under the 2019-2021 Restricted Share Unit Program, which represented the right to earn common shares in the future depending on PREIT’s TSR for the three-year period

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    39


  COMPENSATION  

ending 2021, with half of the award being determined based on the Company’s TSR relative to an index of other REITs and the other half of the award being determined based on the Company’s absolute TSR. As a result of PREIT’s TSR over the measurement period, no common shares were earned under the 2019-2021 Restricted Share Unit Program.

2019 – 2021 Outperformance Unit Payouts

In 2019, the Compensation Committee also awarded to the named executive officer. Unvestedofficers Outperformance Units, or OPUs, as part of their restricted share awards (and not as separate awards). The OPUs entitled the recipient to receive additional shares alsotied to a multiple of the participant’s time-based restricted share award based on the Company’s achievement of certain specified operating performance metrics. The metrics are comprised of (i) Same Store Sales, (ii) Leased Department Store Boxes, and (iii) Cumulative FFO* per share (a non-GAAP measure), each equally weighted. The Compensation Committee approved minimum, target, above target and maximum performance levels for each metric. The minimum performance level has a 0.5 multiplier, the target performance level has a 1.0 multiplier, and the above target and maximum performance levels will have 2.0 and 3.0 multiplier, respectively. Achievement of the metrics was measured over a three-year period ending on December 31, 2021. The 2019 target performance levels for each operating performance metric and achievement as the end of the measurement period were as follows:

   Threshold Target Above
Target
 Outperformance Actual
Achievement
 Payout
Multiplier
applied
       
Same Store Sales per Square Foot $524
per sq ft
 $536
per sq ft
 $542
per sq ft
 $548
per sq ft
 $603 per sq ft

Outperformance

 3.0x
       
Leased Department Store Boxes 85.0% 90.0% 92.5% 95.0% 97.6%

Outperformance

 3.0x
       
Cumulative FFO per share* $100.00 $102.50 $103.75 $105.00 Below threshold N/A

*

We believe that FFO is helpful to management and investors as a measure of operating performance because it excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as gains on sales of operating real estate and depreciation and amortization of real estate, among others. FFO is a commonly used measure of operating performance among REITs, and we use FFO as a supplemental non-GAAP measure to compare our performance for different periods to that of our industry peers. NAREIT defines FFO, which is a non-GAAP measure, as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding (i) depreciation and amortization of real estate, (ii) gains and losses on sales of certain real estate assets, (iii) gains and losses from change in control and (iv) impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. For a reconciliation of FFO to net income (loss) for 2021, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 at pages 58-60.

As a result of the achievement of the operating performance levels noted above, as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2022, the named executive officers were issued the following number of shares in respect of their OPUs on February 9, 2022: Mr. Coradino—500,668; Mr. Ventresca—74,950; Mr. Aristone—69,851; Ms. Crowell—54,977; Mr. Ioannou—64,713; Ms. Most—54,977. 50% of these shares were issued without any further vesting requirements and the remaining 50% are restricted and vest in the eventequal installments on December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023.

The use of termination of employment dueOPUs was designed to death or “disability,” asincentivize the latter term is defined in such named executive officer’sofficers to help PREIT reach its outperformance operating goals over the long term, which goals are developed with the aim of increasing shareholder value. The three-year measurement period and post-measurement period vesting requirements were also designed to increase retentive value.

Other

As previously disclosed in our 2021 proxy statement, in recognition of the Company successfully managing through a very challenging year in 2020 and to ensure continuity and stability of the management team going forward in February 2021, the Board made awards to certain employees in the aggregate amount of $2.75 million. Awards to the named executive officers were: Mr. Ventresca—$350,000; Mr. Aristone—$250,000; Ms. Crowell—$200,000; Mr. Ioannou—$250,000; and Ms. Most—$200,000. Mr. Coradino did not receive an award. These awards are payable in two equal installments on April 1, 2022 and December 1, 2022, contingent on continued employment agreement.with the company on the payment date.

40    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

Share Ownership and Retention Guidelines

Our Board of Trustees has adopted trustee and executive officer share ownership and retention guidelines. Many of theseThese guidelines generally have been incorporated into our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website, www.preit.com. Under the guidelines, (i) the Chief Executive Officer is required to own securities of PREIT having an aggregate dollar value equal to five times his base salary, and (ii) any other named executive officer is to maintain an aggregate value equal to two times his or her respective base salary and (iii) each non-employee trustee is required to maintain an aggregate value equal to threefive times his or herthe respective base salary.annual board retainer. Each named executive officer and each other covered officernon-employee trustee is required to be in compliance with the retention requirementsguidelines within five years after becoming such an officer. All officers to whom the share ownershipofficer or trustee. Unless and retention guidelines apply are in compliance with the guidelines.

Untiluntil the preceding ownership levels have been met, by a covered officer, the guidelines state that each suchnamed executive officer shall retain 100% of the net shares received under an equity-based compensation plan. In addition, even

after satisfying2018, the ownership guidelines, each covered officer is required to retain 50%Company added an additional requirement, that all vesting time-based restricted shares and all shares ultimately awarded at the end of theany measurement period under any RSU program, beginning with shares received under an equity-based compensation planand RSUs granted in 2018, be held for a minimum one year period after the vestingvesting.

The aggregate dollar value of shares.

Non-employee trustees are required, within five years after becoming a trustee, to maintain ownershipPREIT securities for purposes of at least five times the base annual board retainer paid to non-employee trustees. All trustees are in compliance with ourthese share ownership and retention guidelines is the market value of those securities on the date of grant for any vested restricted shares held by an officer or trustee and the market value as of the acquisition date for any securities obtained through open market purchases made by the officer or trustee.

As of the Record Date, all of the named executive officers and non-employee trustees are expectedcompliant, either because they hold sufficient shares or they are in an applicable grace period. We will continue to be withinmonitor compliance with these guidelines by our named executive officers and non-employee trustees as their substantial equity holdings are part of our overall goal of aligning their interests with the allotted time period.interests of our shareholders.

Recoupment Policy

We have adopted a policy on recoupment of performance basedperformance-based compensation in the event of the restatement of our financial statements (also known as a “clawback” policy). The policy has been incorporated into our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website, www.preit.com. The policy provides that if the intentional misconduct or fraud of a senior officer or former senior officer (including any of the named executive officers) causes or partially causes us to restate all or a portion of our financial statements, the Board of Trustees may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, require the repayment of a portion or all of any cash incentive award, vested restricted shares or other equity incentive-based compensation paid pursuant to grants made on or after January 1, 2008 to such senior officer or former senior officer and/or may cancel any unvested restricted shares, if (1) the amount or vesting of the incentive-based compensation was calculated based upon, or dependent on, the achievement of financial or operating results that were adversely affected by the restatement, and (2) the amount or vesting of the incentive-based compensation would have been less if the incentive compensation had been determined in light of the financial or operating results as restated.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Trustees

As described above in the section entitled “Employee, Officer and Trustee Hedging,” trustees and certain officers are prohibited from hedging their positions in our common shares. Trustees and certain officers are prohibited from holding positions in our securities in a margin account (subject to certain grandfathered exceptions), and may only pledge such securities to secure a loan with the prior approval of our Chief Compliance Officer, who must make a determination that the number and value of such securities is not significant relative to the number of outstanding securities of the applicable class, the market value or trading volume of such securities or the individual’s total holdings of our securities.

Severance Payments

Each of the current

Mr. Coradino’s and Mr. Ventresca’s employment agreements of the named executive officers, other than Mr. Rubin, providesprovide for severance payments (including accelerated vesting of shares)certain equity awards) upon a termination of employment. Mr. Ventresca doesemployment under specified circumstances. Messrs. Aristone and Ioannou and Mses. Crowell and Most do not have an employment agreementagreements with the Company; however, severance provisions for Mr. VentrescaMessrs. Aristone and Ioannou and Mses. Crowell and Most are provided in the PREIT Services, LLC Severance Pay Plan, for Certain Officers, as modified by a letter agreementagreements with Mr. Ventresca dated May 8, 2013.each. The severance arrangements applicable as of December 31, 2021

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    41


  COMPENSATION  

are described under “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Termination or Change of Control Arrangements” beginning on page 46. The severance arrangements are described under “2015 Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” beginning on page 49. The total payments and benefits listed in that section and the balance in the non-qualified retirement plans for a particular named executive officer shown on page 48 represent the total value that a named executive officer would have received if such officer’s employment had terminated on December 31, 2015 under the circumstances discussed beginning on page 49. The severance arrangements servedesigned to discourage named executive officers from voluntarily terminating their employment to accept other employment opportunities. In the case of a possible change of control, the severance arrangements also serve to encourage named executive officers to remain focused on their duties during a period of uncertainty. A so-called “double trigger” requirement applies to severance payable on account of a termination of employment in connection with a change of control for several of the named executive officers. Accordingly, there must be both a change of control (as defined in the applicable employment agreement) and a timely termination of the named executive officer’s employment in order for any severance payments to be made to those officers, although all restricted shares will vest upon a change in control, and shares will become payable under RSU Programs,programs, if at all, based on our relative TSR performance through the date of the change in control. The function of a double trigger on cash severance payments is to encourage the

named executive officers to remain in our employment or in the employment of our successor in the event that the acquiror does not alter the material conditions of employment as reflected by the events that would give rise to a good reason termination.

In the event of a termination of employment without cause, or by either of Messrs. Coradino or Rubin for good reason, within specified periods before or after a change of control, noneNone of the named executive officers, other than Mr. McCadden, has the right to receive any reimbursement for excise tax payments that may arise under Section 4999 of the Code. Pursuant to an agreement entered into several years ago that has not otherwise been required to be amended, Mr. McCadden is entitled to receive, in addition to the amount otherwise payable upon termination for such events, an amount necessary to pay some or allInternal Revenue Code of the excise tax on “excess parachute payments” imposed by Section 4999 of the Code. Mr. McCadden is entitled to receive a sum equal to one-half of the excise tax payment. In no case is the amount of the additional payment “grossed-up” to cover taxes assessed upon the additional payment.

Under the amended and restated employment agreement for Mr. Rubin, he is entitled to a founder’s retirement payment of $3,500,000 upon termination for any reason other than for cause. The founder’s retirement payment is included in the discussion under “2015 Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” beginning on page 49. In January 2016, the Company announced that it had provided a notice of non-renewal under Mr. Rubin’s employment agreement. Accordingly, Mr. Rubin will be entitled to receive the founder’s retirement payment following the termination of his employment as Executive Chairman on June 7, 2016, and upon the execution of a release as set forth in his employment agreement.1986 (the “Code”).

Share Trading Restrictions

Officers and trustees are subject to “blackout” restrictions that prohibit trading in our securities beginning ten days prior to the end of a fiscal quarter and ending on the third business day after the public release of the results for the fiscal period, unless purchases and sales are made under a plan complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the federal securities laws.

Non-Qualified Retirement Plans

An unfunded, non-qualified retirement plan has beenwas previously established for each of the named executive officers other thanMr. Coradino and Mr. Ventresca. Under each plan, aA specified sum that varies for such named executive officer isunder each plan was credited to hiseach account at the beginning of the year. The amount credited to theeach account of each such named executive officer iswas based on the employment agreement between the Company and such officereach of Mr. Coradino and Mr. Ventresca, and such required annual contribution is set forth in footnote (4) to the Summary Compensation Table. Interest has accruedaccrues on the credited amounts at 10% compounded annually, although forin the case of Mr. CoradinoVentresca, or 5% compounded annually, in the case of Mr. Coradino. Both Mr. Coradino’s and Mr. Rubin, this accrual rate dropped to 5% beginning January 1, 2012Ventresca’s non-qualified retirement plans were terminated in connection2021 and, in accordance with IRS rules, the negotiation and amendment of the employment agreements of Mr. Coradino and Mr. Rubin related to their new roles with the Companyaccount balances remaining in 2012. The account is payable to the named executive officer within 60 days of termination of employment irrespective of the cause for termination (subject to any required delay under Section 409A of the Code). The retirement accounts are intended to aid in the retention of named executive officers by providing a determinable amount of cash available upon retirement. The table on page 48 lists the amounts credited to the accounts of the named executive officers. The amount in the retirement account maintained for Mr. Rubin is expected tothose plans will be paid out during 2022. Interest on the remaining account balances will continue to him in connection withbe credited through the termination of his employment as Executive Chairman in June 2016.time the balances are distributed.

Timing of Equity Grants

Equity awards to our employees under our Long-Term Incentive Award programs described above are generally made at the Compensation Committee’s meeting that occurs in late January or early February of the calendar year. From time to time, that meeting and those decisions may be delayed until later in the first quarter. We have no policy that times the granting of equity awards relative to the release of material non-public information.

Deferred Compensation

We do not offer a deferred compensation program under which our senior executives can elect to defer any portion of their cash compensation. We have permitted recipients of RSUs to defer receipt of the shares earned thereunder. As described above in the section entitled “Non-Qualified“Non-Qualified Retirement Plans,” we also provide previously provided non-elective deferred compensation, as specified in the employment agreements of certain of the named executive officers, which is based solely on employer contributions and credits.

although those arrangements were discontinued in 2021.

No Perquisites

We do not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to any of our named executive officers.

42    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

Benefits Generally Available to Employees

The named executive officers are entitled to participate in our 401(k) Plan, which is generally available to all of our employees. We match a portion of the contributions of the named executive officers up to specified limits on the same terms as apply to other employees. The named executive officers are also entitled to participate in various insurance programs generally available to our employees, including medical, dental, vision, disability and life insurance.

Accounting and Tax Considerations

The RSUs and restricted share grants for 20152021 are subject to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Stock Compensation. As a result of an option to pay out the 2021 grants in cash or shares, these awards were classified as liability-based awards. Under FASB ASC Topic 718, these equityliability classified awards are measured at grant date fair value determined as described in footnote (1) to the 20152021 Summary Compensation Table and not subsequently remeasured.remeasured at each reporting period. The grant date fair value of an equity-classifieda liability-classified award is expensed in our statements of operations over the relevant service period. For tax purposes, however, the equity awards are not deductible prior to the date on which they vest (or in the case of RSUs, prior to the date that shares are issued in respect thereof). Irrespective of when payments are made, the amounts paid under the annual cash incentive opportunity awards were expensed in our statements of operations for the year during which the amounts were earned. The Compensation Committee is aware of the accounting and tax treatment accorded to the equityliability-based and cash awards and total cash compensation generally, but the treatment has not been a significant factor in our compensation programs or in the decisions of the Compensation Committee concerning the amount or type of equity award.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with our management. Based on the Compensation Committee’s review and discussion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

SUBMITTED BY THE

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND

HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Charles P. Pizzi, Chair

M. Walter D’Alessio

Leonard I. Korman

John J. Roberts

2015 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    43


  COMPENSATION  

20152021 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2021 Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows information concerning the compensation recorded by PREIT for the threetwo most recent fiscal years for PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers.

 

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(3)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
  Total ($) 

Joseph F. Coradino —

Chief Executive Officer

and Trustee

  2015    725,000    0    1,689,668    906,250    16,224    60,600    3,397,742  
  2014    650,000    162,000    1,589,879    650,000    13,345    60,400    3,125,624  
  2013    600,000    300,000    1,427,200    750,000    20,878    61,894    3,159,972  

Ronald Rubin —

Executive Chairman and

Trustee

  2015    325,000    325,000    302,988    0    42,400    60,600    1,055,988  
  2014    300,000    300,000    293,511    0    36,194    60,400    990,105  
  2013    300,000    375,000    292,480    0    59,074    61,483    1,088,037  

Robert F. McCadden —

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

  2015    484,718    0    790,786    387,774    36,717    35,600    1,735,595  
  2014    440,653    88,130    774,025    264,392    31,095    35,400    1,633,695  
  2013    427,819    40,000    712,351    320,864    23,946    35,200    1,560,180  

Bruce Goldman —

Executive Vice President,

Secretary and General Counsel

  2015    379,442    0    442,144    303,554    42,106    35,600    1,202,846  
  2014    344,947    68,990    363,816    206,968    35,883    35,400    1,056,004  
  2013    324,947    125,300    315,376    158,411    27,843    35,200    987,077  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. —

Executive Vice President, Operations

  2015    305,001    166,999    284,333    183,001    0    10,600    949,934  

Name and

Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock
Awards
($)
(1)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(2)
  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
(3)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
(4)
  

Total

($)

 

Joseph F. Coradino —

Chief Executive Officer

and Chairman of the Board of Trustees

  2021   900,000   0   2,565,840   2,756,242   37,851   61,600   6,321,533 
  2020   850,000   0   2,387,991   1,000,000   47,468   61,400   4,346,859 
                                

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. —

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  2021   490,000   0   754,214   771,748   5,674   46,600   2,068,236 
  2020   450,000   0   594,928   286,875   2,950   46,400   1,381,153 
                                

Joseph J. Aristone —

Executive Vice President, Leasing

  2021   425,000   0   373,810   446,249   0   11,600   1,256,659 
  2020   400,000   0   352,549   204,000   0   11,400   967,949 
                                

Heather Crowell —

Executive Vice President,

Strategy and Communications

  2021   410,000   0   360,616   430,499   0   11,600   1,212,715 
  2020   400,000   0   352,549   204,000   0   11,400   967,949 
                                

Andrew M. Ioannou —

Executive Vice President,

Finance and Acquisitions

  2021   425,000   0   373,810   446,249   0   11,600   1,256,659 
  2020   400,000   0   352,549   204,000   0   11,400   967,949 
                                

Lisa M. Most —

Executive Vice President,

General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary

  2021   410,000   0   360,616   430,499   0   11,600   1,212,715 
  2020   400,000   0   352,549   204,000   0   11,400   967,949 
        
                                

 

(1)

The amounts shown in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stockequity-based awards granted during the year, as computed in accordance with Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Generally, the aggregate grant date fair value is the amount that PREIT expects to expense in its financial statements over the award’s vesting schedule. The amounts shown reflect PREIT’s accounting expense and do not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the named executive officers. Valuations with respect to awards of time basedtime-based restricted shares and time-based RSUs are reflected in the tables based on the average of the high and low sale prices of a PREIT common share on the date of grant. Valuations with respect to grants of performance basedperformance-based awards are reflected in the tables as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation probabilistic valuation model. With respect to the performance based RSUs,PSUs, if the highest level of performance were to be achieved, then the number of shares that would be received in respect of such RSUs would be 150%240% of the number of RSUsPSUs granted, (plus any additional RSUs deemed acquired as a resultand the value of reinvestment of amounts equal to dividends paid on an equivalentthat maximum number of shares), andshares on the grant date value of such awards (using the original stated value of the RSUs and not including any value attributable to RSUs deemed to be acquired in connection with the subsequent reinvestment of amounts equal to dividends paid on an equivalent number of shares) would have beenwas as follows: Joseph F. Coradino—$1,225,853; Ronald Rubin—$219,818; Robert F. McCadden—$573,714, Bruce Goldman—$320,774, and2,873,491, Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.—$206,283.829,636, Joseph J. Aristone—$411,191, Heather Crowell—$396,677, Andrew M. Ioannou—$411,191 and Lisa M. Most—$396,677. See “2015 Grants“Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Performance-Based Programs.” The number of Plan-Based Awards.” Whethershares the named executive officers willactually receive, if any, shares in respect of the PSU awards will depend on achievement of certain operating performance based awards (RSUs) depends on whether PREIT achieves certain relative performance (TSR) objectives.objectives and PREIT’s TSR over the applicable measurement period compared to an index of other REITs. For information regarding significant factors, assumptions and methodologies used in our computations pursuant to Topic 718 with respect to awards of RSUs, which assumptions included no expirations without the issuance of any shares, see Note 8, “Share Based Compensation,” to PREIT’s consolidated financial statements included in PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2021.

44    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

 

(2)

The amounts shown in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column are comprised of amounts paid in respect of the annual incentive plan, as determined by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the plan

and the awards thereunder; see “Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Components“Compensation—Executive Compensation Overview—Components of Executive Compensation-CashCompensation—Cash Incentive Compensation.” The payments are generally made early in the following year. For 2015,2021, these awards were generally madeearned at 175% of the target level. FFO per share was the primary basislevel for such payments. In 2015, 2014 and 2013, all of Mr. Rubin’s, and in 2013, 35% of Mr. Goldman’s, annual cash incentive awards were related to individual performance and are therefore reported in the “Bonus” column instead of the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column. Similarly, in 2015, a portion of Mr. Ventresca’s award was made in light of the Company’s continued progress in selling non-core assets, and that portion is reported in the “Bonus” column.named executive officers.

 

(3)

The amounts shown in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column represent the above-market portion, which is the amount in excess of 120% of the applicable federal rate, of the interest earned on nonqualified deferred compensation plans of the named executive officers, which is credited as follows: (a) at a rate of 5% compounded annually beginning in 2012for Mr. Coradino, and 10% compounded annually for Mr. Ventresca. The plans for Mr. Coradino and Mr. Rubin,Ventresca were terminated in 2021, and (b) at a rate of 10% compounded annually for Mr. McCadden and Mr. Goldman, on the cumulative balance heldaccount balances are expected to be paid in such officer’s supplemental retirement plan account. Mr. Ventresca does2022. The other named executive officers do not participate in the supplemental executive retirement plan. The applicable federal rate for long term, annual compounding was 2.61%1.90% as of December 2015.2021.

 

(4)

The amounts shown in 20152021 All Other Compensation are comprised of the following:

 

   Non-Qualified
Retirement Plan
Company
Contributions
($)
   Qualified
Plan – 401(k)
Company
Contributions
($)
   Medical
and Other
Core
Benefits
($)
   Separation
Payment
($)
   Total All
Other
Compensation
($)
 

Joseph F. Coradino

   50,000     10,600               60,600  

Ronald Rubin

   50,000     10,600               60,600  

Robert F. McCadden

   25,000     10,600               35,600  

Bruce Goldman

   25,000     10,600               35,600  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

        10,600               10,600  
    Non-Qualified
Retirement Plan
Company
Contributions
($)
   Qualified
Plan – 401(k)
Company
Contributions
($)
   Total All
Other
Compensation
($)
 

Joseph F. Coradino

   50,000    11,600    61,600 

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

   35,000    11,600    46,600 

Joseph J. Aristone

   0    11,600    11,600 

Heather Crowell

   0    11,600    11,600 

Andrew M. Ioannou

   0    11,600    11,600 

Lisa M. Most

   0    11,600    11,600 

Employment Agreements

Employment Agreements

Joseph F. Coradino

Joseph F. Coradino’s employment agreement with PREIT was amended and restated effective June 7, 2012, in connection with Mr. Coradino’s appointment as the Chief Executive Officer of PREIT.May 12, 2021. The initial term of Mr. Coradino’s employment agreement wasis two years, from June 7, 2012,automatically extending year-to-year thereafter unless either party gives notice at least 120 days in advance of any expiration date that the term will not be renewed. Mr. Coradino is entitled to participate in cash and equity incentive programs of PREIT as determined by the Compensation Committee. The annual credit toemployment agreement does not provide Mr. Coradino’s fully vestedCoradino with a supplemental retirement account is $50,000 and the interest accruing on the account is 5.0% per year, compounded annually. The amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan as of December 31, 2004 (plus earnings thereon) are payable to Mr. Coradino or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason. The amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan on and after January 1, 2005 are payable to Mr. Coradino or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination (as defined in the employment agreement to effect compliance with or exemption from Section 409A of the Code) of his employment for any reason, subject to a required delay for some payments pursuant to regulations under Section 409A of the Code.plan. The agreement provides for the nomination of Mr. Coradino as a candidate for election to the Board of Trustees so long as his employment under the agreement has not terminated.

Ronald RubinMario C. Ventresca, Jr.

Ronald Rubin’sIn connection with his appointment as the Chief Financial Officer of PREIT, Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. entered into an employment agreement with PREIT was amended,on March 5, 2020, which is effective June 7, 2012, in connection with the change in Mr. Rubin’s role from Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to Executive Chairmanas of PREIT.January 1, 2020. The initial term of the agreement is three yearsone year from June 7, 2012,the effective date, automatically extending year to yearyear-to-year thereafter unless either partythe Company gives notice to Mr. Ventresca at least 120 days in advance of any expiration date that the term will not be renewed. On January 4, 2016, the Company provided notice of non-renewal of Mr. Rubin’s employment agreement, and, consequently, the term of his employment agreement will expire on June 7, 2016. Additionally, at any time within 120 days prior to any anniversary of the effective date of Mr. Rubin’s agreement, either the Company or Mr. Rubin may request changes in the compensation payable to Mr. Rubin, and if the parties are unable to agree on such requested changes, Mr. Rubin’s employment will terminate on the following anniversary of the effective date and, upon such termination, Mr. Rubin will be entitled to the payments and benefits as if Mr. Rubin’s employment had been terminated without cause. Mr. RubinVentresca is entitled to participate in cash and equity incentive programs of PREIT as determined by the Compensation Committee. The agreement also provides for a founder’s retirement payment toOn July 28, 2021, PREIT and Mr. Rubin of $3,500,000, which is payable to Mr. Rubin in a single sum upon termination of his employment for any reason. The annual credit to Mr. Rubin’s supplemental retirement account is $50,000. The interest accruing on the account is 5.0% per year, compounded annually. The amounts creditedVentresca entered into an amendment to the employment agreement. The amendment increased Mr. Ventresca’s base salary and terminated his entitlement to the nonqualified supplemental retirement plan as of December 31, 2004 (plus earnings thereon) are payable to Mr. Rubin or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason. The amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan on and after January 1, 2005 are payable to Mr. Rubin or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination (as defined in the employment agreement to effect compliance with or exemption from Section 409A of the Code) of his employment for any reason, subject to a required delay for some payments pursuant to regulations under Section 409A of the Code. The agreement also provides for the nomination of Mr. Rubin as a candidate for election to the Board of Trustees so long as his employment under the agreement has not terminated. After the termination of this employment agreement, Mr. Rubin will continue to serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Company’s board of trustees, subject to nomination and election by our shareholders. In that capacity, commencing with the termination of his employment, he will receive a $100,000 annual retainer, with such amount prorated for the calendar year of 2016.

Robert F. McCadden

Robert F. McCadden’s employment agreement with PREIT, was amended and restated effective as of December 30, 2008 for an initial term through December 31, 2009, and extending year-to-year thereafter unless

either party gives notice at least 120 days in advance of any expiration date that the term will not be renewed. Under the agreement, Mr. McCadden serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PREIT. Mr. McCadden’s salary may be increased each year at the discretion of PREIT’s Compensation Committee. In accordance with the agreement, Mr. McCadden is entitled each year to participate in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs as determined by the Compensation Committee.which had obligated PREIT is obligated to credit $25,000$35,000 per year to a supplemental retirement planaccount. Interest on the account that accrues interestbalance will continue to be accrued at the rate of 10% per year, compounded annually. The amounts creditedPREIT expects to the supplemental retirement plan as of December 31, 2004 (plus earnings thereon) are payable topay out Mr. McCadden or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason. The amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan on and after January 1, 2005 are payable to Mr. McCadden or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination (as defined in the employment agreement to effect compliance with or exemption from Section 409A of the Code) of his employment for any reason, subject to a required delay for some payments pursuant to regulations under Section 409A of the Code.Ventresca’s account balance during 2022.

Bruce GoldmanJoseph J. Aristone

Bruce Goldman’s employment agreement with PREIT was amended and restated effective as of December 30, 2008 for an initial term through December 31, 2009, and extending year-to-year thereafter unless either party gives notice at least 120 days in advance of any expiration date that the term will not be renewed. Under the agreement, Mr. Goldman serves as Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of PREIT. Mr. Goldman’s salary may be increased each year at the discretion of PREIT’s Compensation Committee. In accordance with the agreement, Mr. Goldman is entitled each year to participate in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs as determined by the Compensation Committee. PREIT is obligated to credit $25,000 per year to a supplemental retirement plan account that accrues interest at the rate of 10% per year, compounded annually. The amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan as of December 31, 2004 (plus earnings thereon) are payable to Mr. Goldman or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason. The amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan on and after January 1, 2005 are payable to Mr. Goldman or his beneficiaries within 60 days of the termination (as defined in the employment agreement to effect compliance with or exemption from Section 409A of the Code) of his employment for any reason, subject to a required delay for some payments pursuant to regulations under Section 409A of the Code.

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.Joseph J. Aristone does not have a separate employment agreement with PREIT, though he generally participates in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs as determined by the Compensation Committee. As an officer of PREIT

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    45


  COMPENSATION  

Services, LLC, he participates in the PREIT Services, LLC Severance Pan for Certain Officers,Plan, however, the amounts that Mr. VentrescaAristone would receive under that plan have been amended by a separate letter agreement entered into on May 8, 2013. The letter agreement relates specifically to severance benefits upon termination following a change of control and is discussed in “Potential Payments Upon “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Termination or Change of Control Arrangements,” beginning on page 49.46.

Heather Crowell

Heather Crowell does not have a separate employment agreement with PREIT, though she generally participates in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs as determined by the Compensation Committee. As an officer of PREIT Services, LLC, she participates in the Severance Plan, however, the amounts that Ms. Crowell would receive under that plan have been amended by a separate letter agreement entered into on February 24, 2014. The letter agreement relates specifically to severance benefits upon termination following a change of control and is discussed in “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Termination or Change of Control Arrangements,” beginning on page 46.

Andrew M. Ioannou

Andrew M. Ioannou does not have a separate employment agreement with PREIT, though he generally participates in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs as determined by the Compensation Committee. As an officer of PREIT Services, LLC, he participates in the Severance Plan, however, the amounts that Mr. Ioannou would receive under that plan have been amended by a separate letter agreement entered into on May 8, 2013. The letter agreement relates specifically to severance benefits upon termination following a change of control and is discussed in “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Termination or Change of Control Arrangements,” beginning on page 46.

Lisa M. Most

Lisa M. Most does not have a separate employment agreement with PREIT, though she generally participates in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs as determined by the Compensation Committee. As an officer of PREIT Services, LLC, she participates in the Severance Plan, however, the amounts that Ms. Most would receive under that plan have been amended by a separate letter agreement entered into on December 21, 2017. The letter agreement relates specifically to severance benefits upon termination following a change of control and is discussed in “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Termination or Change of Control Arrangements,” beginning on page  46.

Named Executive Officers Generally

Each of theThe employment agreements for the above named executive officers other than Ronald RubinJoseph F. Coradino and Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. also providesprovide for certain severance and other benefits upon certain terminations of employment, as well as certain non-competition/non-solicitation obligations of the executive. Mr. Ronald Rubin’s employment agreement, as described above, does notThe Severance Plan and related letter agreements for Messrs. Aristone and Ioannou and Mses. Crowell and Most similarly provide for any cash severance payments, although he would receive the founder’s retirement payment as described above. Mr. Ventresca’s letter agreement similarly provides for certain severance and other benefits upon termination of employment. See “Potential Payments Upon “Compensation—2021 Executive Compensation—Termination or Change of Control Arrangements,” beginning on page 49,46, for a description of all such benefits and obligations.

Termination or Change of Control Arrangements

Following is a summary of the arrangements that provide for payment to our named executive officers at, following or in connection with any termination, including resignation, severance, retirement or constructive termination, or in connection with a change of control or a change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities.

In connection with any actual termination of employment or change of control transaction, however, we may decide to enter into an agreement or establish an arrangement providing different or additional amounts, or altering the terms of the benefits described below.

2015 Grants of Plan-Based AwardsTermination by Us Without Cause, Termination by a Senior Executive for Good Reason or Our Election Not to Renew the Employment Agreement Not Associated with a Change in Control.

If we terminate Joseph F. Coradino’s employment for a reason other than for “cause,” which is generally defined to include fraud in connection with his employment, theft of PREIT funds, acts which are grounds for termination under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, indictment for a crime of moral turpitude, breach of confidentiality or

46    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

non-competition obligations, continued failure to perform duties 30 days after a written demand specifying the nature of the failure, or repeated abuse of alcohol or drugs, or if he terminates his employment with us for “good reason,” which includes PREIT’s material breach of its obligations to him under his employment agreement, a material change in the geographic location at which he provides services, or a material diminution in his authority, duties or responsibilities (in each case, after 30 days written notice and failure to cure); and he is not nominated for election as a trustee, then:

He will be entitled to (less applicable withholding taxes):

��

all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement as of the date of his termination;

two times the sum of (1) his base salary and (2) his target bonus then in effect, payable in installments over time;

a pro rata bonus for the year of termination based on his target bonus then in effect;

he, his spouse and dependents will have rights to COBRA continuation coverage under PREIT’s health plans for a period of 18 months, or until Mr. Coradino is eligible for healthcare coverage under another employer’s group health plan, with the Company to pay the applicable premium;

the immediate vesting of any outstanding restricted share or RSU awards subject to vesting solely upon the passage of time; and

outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units subject to vesting based upon performance granted prior to 2021 will be treated in accordance with the applicable award agreement (which generally provide for vesting based on actual performance) and outstanding awards subject to vesting based upon performance granted during or after 2021 will remain outstanding and will vest or be forfeited based on actual performance through the applicable performance period.

If we terminate Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.’s employment for a reason other than for “cause,” which is generally defined to include fraud in connection with his employment, theft of PREIT funds, acts which are grounds for termination under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, indictment for a crime of moral turpitude, breach of confidentiality or non-competition obligations, continued failure to perform duties 30 days after a written demand specifying the nature of the failure, or repeated abuse of alcohol or drugs, or if he terminates his employment with us for “good reason,” which includes PREIT’s material breach of its obligations to him under his employment agreement, a material change in the geographic location at which he provides services, or a material diminution in his authority, duties or responsibilities (in each case, after 30 days written notice and failure to cure), then:

He will be entitled to (less applicable withholding taxes):

all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement;

a cash lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of (x) his then-current base salary (such amount being discounted to present value) plus (y) an amount calculated by multiplying such then-current base salary by the average percentage of base salary paid as a bonus in the last three calendar years;

he and his spouse, if any, and dependents will continue to receive medical benefits for a period of 12 months to the extent PREIT was paying for such benefits prior to such termination; and

the vesting of any restricted shares and any performance-based restricted stock units and outperformance units (in accordance with the Company’s applicable Equity Incentive Plans and the Equity Award Programs adopted thereunder).

Each of Joseph J. Aristone, Heather Crowell, Andrew M. Ioannou and Lisa M. Most is an executive officer of the Company. None of these officers had an employment agreement with the Company during 2021, but each was covered by the Severance Plan. Under this plan, if Mr. Aristone, Ms. Crowell, Mr. Ioannou or Ms. Most is terminated other than for cause or he/she resigns for “good reason,” he/she would receive (A) payment in the amount equal to the greater of (i) 16 weeks of salary or (ii) four weeks of salary plus two weeks of salary for each year of service credited to him/her under the plan, plus (B) a pro-rated bonus amount equal to the average of the last two bonuses that he received prior to his/her termination date multiplied by the portion of the year worked prior to termination, as set forth

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    47


  COMPENSATION  

in the plan. The following table shows information concerningsummarizes eligibility for continued salary payments and COBRA coverage, subject to eligibility and election, upon termination of such executive officers other than for cause.

Name

  Years of Service
Credited Under
the Plan
   Weeks of
Pay for
Termination
Other than
For Cause
   Weeks of Pay for
COBRA
Premiums for
Medical and
Dental Coverage
 

Joseph J. Aristone

   26    56    56 

Heather Crowell

   16    36    36 

Andrew M. Ioannou

   20    44    44 

Lisa M. Most

   21    46    46 

As described in the Severance Plan, “good reason” means resigning because the employee declines to relocate to a new principal office that is more than 50 miles from his or her primary residence and at least 20 miles further from such residence than the employee’s current principal office.

Termination by Us for Cause or Resignation by the Executive Without Good Reason

If we terminate the employment of any named executive officer for cause, or if any named executive officer resigns without Good Reason, then:

PREIT will pay to him or her (less applicable withholding taxes) all earned but unpaid wages through the date of termination;

each outstanding equity award shall be governed by the terms of the relevant plan and/or award agreement; and

the executive and his or her spouse and dependents will have rights under PREIT’s health plans as provided by COBRA at his or her sole expense.

Mr. Coradino becomes retirement eligible if he delivers to the Board one year’s advance written notice of his retirement and remains in continuous service with the Company for one year following delivery of such notice. However, upon this notice, the Board may elect to accelerate the effective date of Mr. Coradino’s retirement to a sooner date, in which case Mr. Coradino must only remain in service through the earlier date selected by the Board. If the Board elects to accelerate the effective date of retirement, the Company will pay to Mr. Coradino:

an amount equal to the base salary that would have otherwise been payable through the one year anniversary of his delivery of notice of retirement;

payout of any otherwise earned annual bonus for the fiscal year preceding his retirement (if not previously paid); and

a pro-rated annual bonus for the fiscal year in which such termination of employment occurs based on actual performance.

Additionally, Mr. Coradino would be entitled to the immediate vesting of any outstanding restricted share or RSU awards subject to vesting solely upon the passage of time for grants made during or after 2021, but the shares issued in respect thereof will be subject to stop-transfer orders until the otherwise applicable vesting date. Outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units subject to vesting based upon performance granted during or after 2021 will remain outstanding and will vest or be forfeited based on actual performance through the applicable performance period.

For purposes of plan-basedcalculating the retirement eligible bonus amounts due, and for any vesting of equity awards madeunder the employment agreement, the date of Mr. Coradino’s termination will be deemed to occur no earlier than the four month anniversary of notice of retirement and any unused vacation days will be added to such date.

48    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

Death or Disability

Under our employment agreement with Mr. Coradino, if he dies during the term of his employment agreement, or if he is unable to perform his duties for 120 days during any 150-day period (“disability”) and PREIT elects to terminate his employment, then:

He will be entitled to (less applicable withholding taxes):

all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement;

if PREIT achieves its specified performance target(s), the pro rata portion of any amount payable under the annual cash incentive plan with respect to the year of termination that he would have earned had he remained employed with us;

with respect to restricted stock and RSUs granted prior to 2021, such awards are treated in accordance with the applicable award agreement;

with respect to then outstanding restricted stock and RSUs granted during or after 2021 which are subject to vesting solely based on the passage of time, such awards will immediately vest,

with respect to those outstanding awards that are granted during or after 2021, which are subject to vesting based upon performance (however measured), such awards will remain outstanding and will vest or be forfeited, in whole or in part, based on actual performance through the end of the applicable performance period; and

he, his spouse and dependents will have rights to COBRA continuation coverage under PREIT’s health plans for a period of 18 months with the Company to pay the applicable premium.

If Mr. Ventresca dies during the term of his employment agreement, or if he is unable to perform his duties for 120 days during any 150-day period (“disability”) and PREIT elects to terminate his employment, then:

He will be entitled to (less applicable withholding taxes):

all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement;

if PREIT achieves its specified performance target(s), the pro rata portion of any amount payable under the annual cash incentive plan with respect to the year of termination that he would have earned had he remained employed with us; and

he, his spouse and dependents will continue to receive medical benefits for the 12-month period immediately following his termination of employment to the extent PREIT was paying for such benefits prior to such death or disability.

Mr. Aristone, Ms. Crowell, Mr. Ioannou and Ms. Most will not receive benefits under the Severance Plan in event of death, but:

all unvested restricted shares that vest solely based on the passage of time and continued employment will vest; and

if any of them had begun to receive severance benefits at the time of death, the remaining amounts due would be paid in a lump sum to that person’s estate.

Time-Based Restricted Shares and RSU Programs

Under the Company’s equity programs that vest solely upon the passage of time, if the employment of any named executive officer is terminated due to death or disability, any otherwise unvested restricted shares or RSUs will vest.

Performance-Based PSU Programs

Under the Company’s performance-based equity programs, if any named executive officer is terminated by PREIT in 2015 to PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andfor a reason other than for “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” or because of death or disability, the named executive officers.officer will remain eligible to receive shares under the applicable PSU Program as if the officer’s employment had not terminated. If the named executive officer’s employment is terminated for any other reason, the officer forfeits such PSUs.

 

Name

 Grant
Date
  

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(4)
 
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
   

Joseph F. Coradino

  2015    362,500    906,250    1,450,000       
  2/24/2015       18,523    37,046    55,569     817,235  
  2/24/2015          37,046    872,433  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Total    362,500    906,250    1,450,000    18,523    37,046    55,569    37,046    1,689,668  

Ronald Rubin

  2/24/2015       3,322    6,643    9,965     146,545  
  2/24/2015          6,643    156,443  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Total       3,322    6,643    9,965    6,643    302,988  

Robert F. McCadden

  2015    145,415    387,774    581,662       
  2/24/2015       8,669    17,338    26,007     382,476  
  2/24/2015          17,338    408,310  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Total    145,415    387,774    581,662    8,669    17,338    26,007    17,338    790,786  

Bruce Goldman

  2015    113,833    303,554    455,330       
  2/24/2015       4,847    9,694    14,541     213,850  
  2/24/2015          9,694    228,294  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Total    113,833    303,554    455,330    4,847    9,694    14,541    9,694    442,144  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

  2015    91,500    183,001    366,001       
  2/24/2015       3,117    6,234    9,351     137,522  
  2/24/2015          6,234    146,811  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Total    91,500    183,001    366,001    3,117    6,234    9,351    6,234    284,333  

 

(1)The amounts shown under Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent the potential threshold, target and outperformance awards under the 2015 annual cash incentive compensation plan based on specified corporate performance metrics.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    49


  COMPENSATION  

 

(2)The numbers shown under Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent the number of shares issuable in connection with the RSUs, not including RSUs resulting from the deemed investment of amounts equal to dividends paid on an equivalent number of common shares. See “Performance Based Programs—Restricted Share Unit Program.” The recipient is not entitled to any voting rights in connection with the RSUs. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a discussion of the objectives of the RSUs. Whether the named executive officers will receive any shares in respect of the RSUs depends on whether PREIT achieves certain relative performance (TSR) objectives. If the measurement period had ended on December 31, 2015, PREIT would have met the objective for the 2014 RSU grants at a level resulting in an award of shares equal to 92% of the original number of RSUs, and PREIT would have met the objective for the 2015 RSU grants at a level resulting in an award of shares equal to 88% of the original number of RSUs.

(3)

The numbers shown under All Other Stock Awards represent the number of time based restricted shares granted under PREIT’s Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. These shares will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on or about February 15th of the year after the date of grant, subject to continued employment. During the period that the restricted shares have not vested, the recipient is entitled to vote the shares and to receive an amount equal to the dividends that would have been paid on

the shares if they were vested. PREIT made cash distributions to all holders of common shares of $0.84 per share in 2015. In February 2016, PREIT’s Board of Trustees declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.21 per share payable in March 2016.

(4)The amounts shown in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards column represent the fair value of the awards on the date of grant, as computed in accordance with Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Valuations with respect to grants of performance based awards are reflected in the tables as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation probabilistic valuation model. Whether the named executive officers will receive any shares in respect of the performance based awards (RSUs) depends on whether PREIT achieves certain relative performance (TSR) objectives. For information regarding significant factors, assumptions and methodologies used in our computations pursuant to Topic 718 with respect to grants of RSUs, see Note 8, “Share Based Compensation,” to PREIT’s consolidated financial statements included in PREIT’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Valuations with respect to awards of time based restricted shares are reflected in the tables based on the average of the high and low sale prices of a PREIT common share on the date of grant.

Performance Based ProgramsOutperformance Unit Program

In the event of termination of employment due to retirement, by the employee for “good reason”, by the Company without cause, or due to death or disability, vesting of the restricted shares issued in respect of any earned OPUs will be accelerated for any shares not yet fully vested.

Change of Control

Under our employment agreement with Mr. Coradino, if there is a change of control of PREIT, and within six months before such Change of Control or 12 months after either (i) Mr. Coradino’s employment is terminated by us without Cause or (ii) Mr. Coradino’s employment is terminated by him with Good Reason then he will be entitled to the same severance benefits described above under “Termination by Us Without Cause, Termination by a Senior Executive for Good Reason or Our Election Not to Renew the Employment Agreement Not Associated with a Change in Control,” except that the multiple of base pay plus target bonus received by him will be increased from two to three.

If the employment of Mr. Ventresca is terminated within six months before or 12 months after a change of control of PREIT without “cause” (including our election not to renew the agreement), or by him for “good reason,” then he will be entitled to the same severance benefits described above under “Termination by Us Without Cause, Termination by a Senior Executive for Good Reason or Our Election Not to Renew the Employment Agreement Not Associated with a Change in Control,” except that the multiple of base pay plus average bonus received by him will be increased from one to two.

If Mr. Aristone, Ms. Crowell, Mr. Ioannou or Ms. Most is terminated in connection with a change of control because (i) he/she is not offered a position with the successor company, (ii) he/she declines an offered position that is more than 50 miles from his/her primary residence (and at least 20 miles further from such residence than his/her current principal office), or (iii) he/she declines a position because the base salary of the position is less than the then-current base salary and/or the position does not include participation in a comparable bonus program, then PREIT will pay him/her (less applicable withholding taxes) an amount equal to 104 weeks of salary, plus an amount equal to the average of the last two bonuses that he/she received prior to his/her termination date, multiplied by two. In addition, if Mr. Aristone, Ms. Crowell, Mr. Ioannou or Ms. Most is eligible for and elects to receive COBRA coverage, the Company will pay his/her premiums for medical and dental coverage for 52 weeks.

Performance-Based Programs

Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”PSU”) Programs

In 2013, 20142019, 2020 and 2015,2021, the Compensation Committee made awards in the form of market-based performance contingent restricted share units, or RSUs,PSUs, under the 2013-2015 Restricted Share Unit2019-2021 PSU Program (for grants made in 2013)2019), the 2014-2016 Restricted Share Unit2020-2022 PSU Program (for grants made in 2014)2020), and the 2015-2017 Restricted Share Unit2021-2023 PSU Program (for grants made in 2015)2021). PREIT formerly referred to performance-based RSUs as RSUs, however, beginning in 2021, PREIT began granting time-based RSUs. For ease of reference and clarity, for purposes of this Proxy Statement, performance based restricted share units are referred to as “PSUs” and time-based restricted share units are referred to as “RSUs”.

The RSUsPSUs represent the right to earn common shares in the future depending on PREIT’s total shareholder return, or TSR, for the three year measurement period (the “Measurement Period”) endedending December 31, 20152021 (for grants made in 2013), ending December 31, 2016 (for grants made in 2014) and ending December 31, 2017 (for grants made in 2015)2019) relative to the TSR for the applicable Measurement Periodmeasurement period of the component companies in the MSCI US REIT Index (the “Index”)REITs for those periods. Dividends paid by PREIT during the Measurement Periodmeasurement period are deemed to be invested in additional RSUsPSUs for the account of the named executive officer at the 20 day20-day average closing price of a share of PREIT ending on the dividend payment date. If TSR is equal to or above the 25th25th percentile of companies in the Index during the Measurement Period,measurement period, the RSUsPSUs based on the Company’s TSR relative to the Index (including RSUsPSUs resulting from reinvestment of amounts equal to dividends) will vest and there will be issued a number of shares ranging from 50% up to a maximum of 150%200% (at or above the 75th75th percentile of companies in the Index) of the number of RSUs.PSUs. The Measurement PeriodsPSUs tied to the Company’s absolute level of TSR are eligible to vest based on an award multiplier ranging from 0% (if such absolute level of TSR is below 20%), in which case no PSUs tied to this measurement vest, to 200% (if such absolute level of TSR is over 50%).

The PSUs granted in 2021 and 2020 vest, and shares are issued, based upon PREIT’s performance in certain operating performance measures and a modification based on the TSR of PREIT over the three-year measurement period beginning January 1, 2020 or 2021 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2022 or 2023 or the date of a change in control of PREIT. The TSR modifier depends on PREIT’s TSR performance over the measurement period relative to the TSR of the Index REITS.

50    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

Operating Performance Measures: The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by PREIT with respect to the PSUs under the 2020-2022 PSU Program awarded is based on a multiple determined by achievement of two operating performance measures during the measurement period, consisting of the three-year core mall non-anchor occupancy and the three-year fixed charge coverage ratio, which are each weighted 50%. For all participants, the minimum performance level will have a 0.5 multiplier, the target performance level will have a 1.0 multiplier and the maximum performance level will have a 2.0 multiplier. The preliminary number of common shares to be issued by PREIT with respect to the PSUs under the 2021-2023 PSU Program awarded is based on a multiple determined by achievement of two operating performance measures during the measurement period, consisting of the three-year core mall occupancy and the three-year corporate debt yield, which are each weighted 50%.

TSR Modifier: For both the 2020-2022 and 2021-2023 PSU programs, the preliminary number of common shares to be issued by PREIT with respect to the PSUs awarded as determined under the operating performance goals will be adjusted, upwards or downwards, depending on PREIT’s TSR for the 2014-2016 RSUmeasurement period relative to the performance of the Index REITs.

If PREIT’s TSR performance over the measurement period is equal to or below the 25th percentile of the Index REITs, then 80% of the preliminary number of shares will be earned.

If PREIT’s TSR during the measurement period is above the 25th percentile of the Index REITs, and below the 50th percentile, then the adjustment to the preliminary number of shares earned will be determined by linear interpolation between 80% at the 25th percentile (as set forth in the prior bullet) and 100% at the 50th percentile (as set forth in the subsequent bullet).

If PREIT’s TSR during the measurement period is equal to the 50th percentile of the Index REITs, then 100% of the preliminary number of shares will be earned.

If PREIT’s TSR during the measurement period is above the 50th percentile of the Index REITs, and below the 75th percentile, then the adjustment to the preliminary number of shares earned will be determined by linear interpolation between 100% at the 50th percentile (as set forth in the prior bullet) and 120% at the 75th percentile (as set forth in the subsequent bullet).

If PREIT’s TSR during the measurement period is equal to or above the 75th percentile of the Index REITs, then a number of shares equal to 120% of the preliminary number of shares will be earned.

If the Company fails to achieve the performance operating targets, there will be no payout under the awards, regardless of relative TSR performance.

The measurement periods for the 2020-2022 PSU Program and the 2015-2017 RSU2021-2023 PSU Program are still in progress; accordingly, it cannot yet be determined what portion, if any, of the RSUsPSUs granted under those programs will be earned. No PSUs were earned under the 2019-2021 PSU Program.

If, prior to the last day of the measurement period, the named executive officer’s employment is terminated by PREIT for a reason other than cause or by the named executive officer for good reason or because of the death or disability of the named executive officer, the named executive officer will remain eligible to receive shares under the program as if the officer’s employment had not terminated. If the named executive officer’s employment is terminated for any other reason, the named executive officer will forfeit all of the PSUs.

All Performance-Based Programs

Except if there is a change of control, participants may elect to defer delivery of all or a portion of the shares to be awarded to such participant pursuant to these performance-based programs until separation from service or a specified date chosen by the participant. If a participant elects to defer delivery until separation from service, PREIT must deliver the shares to participants who are “specified employees,” as defined in Section 409A of the Code, upon the earlier of six months after separation from service or death. Participants who elect to defer delivery of their shares will have dividend equivalents credited on their deferred shares which will be reinvested in notional shares (on which dividend equivalents will also be credited and so reinvested). A participant who has elected to defer delivery of his or her shares may elect to receive the shares prior to the scheduled delivery date in the event of an unforeseeable emergency.

If, prior to the last day of the Measurement Period, the named executive officer’s employment is terminated by PREIT for a reason other than cause or by the named executive officer for good reason (or in the case of Mr. Ronald Rubin, voluntary termination) or because of the death or disability of the named executive officer, the named executive officer will remain eligible to receive shares under the program as if his employment had not terminated. If the named executive officer’s employment is terminated for any other reason, the named executive officer will forfeit all of the RSUs.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    51


  COMPENSATION  

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20152021 Fiscal Year End

The following table shows information concerning outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2015,2021, including both awards subject to market-based performance conditions and time basedtime-based awards, made by PREIT to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers.

 

  Stock Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That
Have Not Vested
(#)(1)
   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested
(#)(3)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested
($)(2)
   Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That
Have Not Vested
(#)
(1)
   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(2)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested
(#)
(3)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested
($)
(2)
 

Joseph F. Coradino

   79,189     1,731,863     133,033     2,909,432     1,096,150    1,118,073    1,415,907    1,444,225 

Ronald Rubin

   11,961     261,587     15,542     339,904  

Robert F. McCadden

   38,019     831,476     64,627     1,413,392  

Bruce Goldman

   19,232     420,604     31,331     685,209  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

   11,392     249,143     12,709     277,946     276,656    282,189    331,692    338,326 

Joseph J. Aristone

   146,975    149,915    201,680    205,714 

Heather Crowell

   141,353    144,180    183,141    186,804 

Andrew M. Ioannou

   146,299    149,225    196,542    200,473 

Lisa M. Most

   141,353    144,180    183,141    186,804 

 

(1)

The numbers shown under Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested represent the number of time basedtime-based restricted shares or time-based RSUs granted under PREIT’s Second Amended and Restated 20032018 Equity Incentive Plan. ThesePlan (or for Mr. Coradino, RSUs granted pursuant to a Restricted Share Unit and Outperformance Unit Award Agreement). The restricted shares, willwhich were issued in 2019 and 2020, vest in three equal annual installments beginning on or about February 15th of the year after the date of grant, subject generally to continued employment. The vesting dates of the restricted shares shown in this column are as follows:

 

Vesting Date

  Joseph F. Coradino   Ronald Rubin   Robert F. McCadden   Bruce Goldman   Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. 

2/16/2016

   40,087     4,874     19,448     9,474     5,473  

2/15/2017

   26,754     4,873     12,792     6,527     3,841  

2/15/2018

   12,348     2,214     5,779     3,231     2,078  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   79,189     11,961     38,019     19,232     11,392  

Vesting Date  

 Joseph F. Coradino  Mario C Ventresca, Jr.  Joseph J. Aristone  Heather Crowell  Andrew M. Ioannou  Lisa M. Most 
2/15/2022  180,838   38,505   26,163   24,206   25,487   24,206 
2/15/2023  114,989   28,647   16,976   16,976   16,976   16,976 
Total  295,827   67,152   43,139   41,182   42,463   41,182 

The RSUs, which were issued in 2021, vest in three equal annual installments on or about March 31, 2022, March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2024, subject to continued employment. Mr. Ventresca has 209,504 RSUs; Mr. Aristone has 103,386 RSUs; Ms. Crowell has 100,171 RSUs; Mr. Ioannou has 103,386 RSUs; and Ms. Most has 100,171 RSUs. Upon vesting, the RSUs will be settled in cash or in common shares as determined by the Compensation Committee. On March 31, 2022, the first installment of vested RSUs were settled in cash.    

For Mr. Coradino, includes 800,323 cash-settled, time-based RSUs awarded to him pursuant to a Restricted Share Unit and Outperformance Unit Award Agreement (“Coradino Award Agreement”) in connection with execution of his amended and restated employment agreement in 2021. These RSUs vest in three equal installments on March 31, 2022, March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2024, subject generally to continued employment (and to accelerated vesting under his amended and restated employment agreement upon certain termination events).

 

(2)

The market value of shares is based upon the closing market price per share of PREIT’s common shares as of December 31, 20152021 of $21.87.$1.02.

 

(3)

The amounts shown under Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested represent (i) the aggregate of the number of RSUs,performance-based PSUs, including RSUsPSUs “acquired” as a result of the application of dividends deemed credited to the account of the named executive officer; and (ii) the aggregate number of OPUs, including OPUs “acquired” as a result of the application of dividends deemed credited to the account of the named executive officer. The amountamounts shown representsrepresent: (i) the percentage of RSUsPSUs that will be earned and delivered as shares: 1)shares under the 20132020 PSU plan, at a level between target and the outperformance level (these shares were issued on January 19, 2016) and 2) under both the 2014 plan and the 2015 plans assuming PREIT’s TSR is at the target level. The vesting or expiration datesachievement of the RSUs shown in this column are as follows:operating performance goals at threshold and no adjustment upward or downward based on PREIT relative TSR; (ii) the percentage of PSUs that will

 

    Joseph F. Coradino   Ronald Rubin   Robert F. McCadden   Bruce Goldman   Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. 

Vesting Date

                    

1/19/2016

   47,738          23,827     10,548     3,145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

   47,738          23,827     10,548     3,145  

Expiration Date

  

(Shown at target - 100%)

             

12/31/2016

   46,780     8,636     22,774     10,705     3,083  

12/31/2017

   38,515     6,906     18,026     10,078     6,481  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

   85,295     15,542     40,800     20,783     9,564  

Total

   133,033     15,542     64,627     31,331     12,709  

52    2022 Proxy Statement2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

be earned and delivered as shares under the 2021 PSU plan, assuming achievement of the operating performance goals at target and no adjustment upward or downward based on PREIT relative TSR; and (iii) the number of OPUs that were determined by the Compensation Committee to have been earned under the 2019 OPU plan upon completion of the measurement period on December 31, 2021. The OPUs were awarded and settled in common shares (50% of which were immediately vested and the remaining 50% of which will vest in equal installments on December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023). No shares are included with respect to the 2019-2021 PSU plan as the performance criteria was not satisfied and no shares were issued. The actual number of shares issued in connection with earned PSUs will be determined based on achievement of performance-based measures through the end of the applicable performance period.

The following table shows information concerningvesting dates of the 2015 issuance of shares in respect of performance based RSUsPSUs and the 2015 vesting of restricted shares awarded to PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers. There were no share options exercised by PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or other named executive officersissued upon completion of the measurement period OPUs shown in 2015.this column are as follows:

 

   Stock Awards(1) 

Name

  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
   Value
Realized
on Vesting ($)
 

Joseph F. Coradino

   153,047    $3,713,133  

Ronald Rubin

   73,008    $1,812,715  

Robert F. McCadden

   61,985    $1,536,550  

Bruce Goldman

   27,632    $684,939  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

   10,411    $257,651  

Vesting Date  

 Joseph F. Coradino  Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.  Joseph J. Aristone  Heather Crowell  Andrew M. Ioannou  Lisa M. Most 
PSUs         
12/31/2022  189,609   47,238   27,993   27,993   27,993   27,993 
12/31/2023  725,630   209,504   103,836   100,171   103,836   100,171 
Restricted
Shares
issued
in respect
of OPUs(1)
         
12/31/2021  250,334   37,475   34,926   27,488   32,357   27,488 
12/31/2022  125,167   18,738   17,463   13,744   16,178   13,744 
12/31/2023  125,167   18,737   17,462   13,745   16,178   13,745 
Total  1,415,907   331,692   201,680   183,141   196,542   183,141 

 

(1)

OPUs were granted as part of the restricted share awards (and not as separate awards) in 2019. The amounts showntarget level presented represents the application of a 1.0 multiplier to the number of restricted shares issued to such named executive officer. For the OPUs, achievement of the metrics was measured over a three-year period ending on December 31, 2021. As a result of the achievement of the operating performance levels over the three-year period, as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2022, the named executive officers were issued the following number of shares on February 9, 2022: Mr. Coradino—500,668; Mr. Ventresca—74,950; Mr. Aristone—69,851; Ms. Crowell—54,977; Mr. Ioannou—64,713; Ms. Most—54,977. As reflected in the Numberabove table, 50% of Shares Acquiredthese shares were issued without any further vesting requirements and the remaining 50% are restricted and vest in equal installments on Vesting column represent (a) shares issued in respect of performance based RSUs awarded under the 2012-2014 RSU Program,December 31, 2022 and (b) the vesting of time based restricted shares as follows:December 31, 2023. See “Compensation—Executive Compensation Overview—Long Term Incentive Awards—2019—2021 Outperformance Unit Payouts.”

   RSUs   Restricted Shares 
   (#)   ($)   (#)   ($) 

Joseph F. Coradino

   76,726     1,908,943     76,321     1,804,190  

Ronald Rubin

   58,684     1,460,058     14,324     352,657  

Robert F. McCadden

   40,306     1,002,813     21,679     533,737  

Bruce Goldman

   17,843     443,934     9,789     241,005  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

   5,125     127,510     5,286     130,141  

Pension BenefitsThe cash-settled, time-based RSUs granted to Mr. Coradino in 2021 pursuant to the Coradino Award Agreement also include an “outperformance multiplier” that would entitle Mr. Coradino to receive the dollar value of an additional number of common shares (“Outperformance Units”) tied to a multiple of the number of RSUs if the Company’s share price achieves certain outperformance goals. The share price will be measured based on the closing prices of a common share for the 60 days on which common shares were traded prior to and including the last day of a measurement period ending on December 31, 2023. No Outperformance Units will be earned if the share price is less than $4.00. If any amounts are earned in respect of the Outperformance Units at the end of the measurement period, they will be settled in cash based on the fair market value of a common share on the last day of the measurement period. Based on performance during 2021, these cash-settled Outperformance Units would result in a zero payout. In accordance with SEC rules, these cash-settled Outperformance Units are reflected in the above table assuming payout at threshold.

None of our named executive officers participate in or have accrued benefits under qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by us.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    53


  COMPENSATION  

20152021 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table shows information concerning contributions, earnings, distributions and balances under non-qualified defined contribution and other deferred compensation plans maintained for PREIT’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers.

 

Name

  Registrant
Contributions
In Last FY
($)(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
   Aggregate
Balance
at Last
FYE ($)(3)
   Registrant
Contributions
In Last FY
($)(1)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(2)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 Aggregate
Balance
at Last
FYE ($)(3)
 

Joseph F. Coradino

   50,000     43,425          911,917     50,000    69,579    (318,234 1,255,303 

Ronald Rubin

   50,000     113,492          2,383,339  

Robert F. McCadden

   25,000     53,461          588,068  

Bruce Goldman

   25,000     61,307          674,375  

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

                       35,000    7,350    —    80,850 

Joseph J. Aristone

   —      —      —     —   

Heather Crowell

   —      —      —     —   

Andrew M. Ioannou

   —      —      —     —   

Lisa M. Most

   —      —      —     —   

 

(1)

The amounts reported in this column are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation.

 

(2)

The above-market portions of the amounts reported in this column are included in the Summary Compensation Table under Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings, to the extent they exceed 120% of the prevailing long term applicable federal rate.

(3)

Of the amounts reported, the following were previously reported as compensation to the respective named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table prior to 2015:2021: Joseph F. Coradino ($645,234); Ronald Rubin1,135,724), Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. ($1,675,773); Robert F. McCadden ($412,057); and Bruce Goldman ($463,352)38,500).

See “—Employment Agreements”“Compensation—Executive Compensation Overview—Non-Qualified Retirement Plans” for a description of the material termstermination of the supplemental retirement plans of the named executive officers.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

Following is a summary of the arrangements that provide for payment to a named executive officer at, following or in connection with any termination, including resignation, severance, retirement or constructive termination, or in connection with a change of control or a change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities.

Termination by Us Without Cause, Termination by a Senior Executive for Good Reason or Our Election Not to Renew the Employment Agreement Not Associated with a Change in Control. If we terminate Joseph F. Coradino’s, Ronald Rubin’s, Robert F. McCadden’s, Bruce Goldman’s (each, a “Senior Executive”) employment for a reason other than for “Cause,” which is generally defined to include fraud in connection with his employment, theft of PREIT funds, acts which are grounds for termination under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, indictment for a crime of moral turpitude, breach of confidentiality or non-competition obligations, continued failure to perform duties 30 days after a written demand specifying the nature of the failure, or repeated abuse of alcohol or drugs, or if a Senior Executive terminates his employment with us for “Good Reason,” which includes PREIT’s material breach of its obligations to the Senior Executive under the employment agreement, a material change in the geographic location at which the Senior Executive provides services, or a material diminution in the Senior Executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities (in each case, after 30 days written notice and failure to cure); in the case of Joseph F. Coradino and Ronald Rubin, the Senior Executive is not nominated for election as a trustee; and, in the case of Mr. Ronald Rubin only, if the parties are unable to agree on requested changes in the compensation payable to Mr. Ronald Rubin; or if we elect not to renew the Senior Executive’s employment agreement, in any such case not in association with a change in control, then:

PREIT will pay to him (less applicable withholding taxes):

all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement; and

for Mr. Coradino, a cash lump sum severance payment equal to 1.1 times (x) his then-current base salary plus (y) an amount calculated by multiplying such then-current base salary by the average percentage of base salary paid as a bonus in the last three calendar years, (in the case of clause (x), such amount being discounted to present value);

for Mr. Ronald Rubin, a cash lump sum founder’s retirement payment equal to $3,500,000;

for Mr. McCadden and Mr. Goldman, a cash lump sum severance payment equal to two times (x) such Executive’s then-current base salary (such amount being discounted to present value) plus (y) an amount calculated by multiplying such then-current base salary by the average percentage of base salary paid as a bonus to such Executive in the last three calendar years;

in each case, he, his spouse and dependents will continue to receive medical benefits for one year (three years in the case of Mr. Ronald Rubin and two years in the case of Mr. Coradino) to the extent PREIT was paying for such benefits prior to such termination;

any restricted shares will vest; and

Mr. Ronald Rubin would receive any performance based cash incentive award earned as if his employment had not terminated, pro rata for the number of days he was employed during the year.

Mr. Mario C. Ventresca, Jr. is an executive officer of the Company. He does not have an employment agreement with the Company, but is covered by the PREIT Services, LLC Severance Pay Plan for Certain Officers (effective January 1, 2007). Under this plan, Mr. Ventresca would receive payment in the amount equal to the greater of (i) 16 weeks of pay or (ii) four weeks of play plus two weeks of pay for each year of service credited to Mr. Ventresca under the plan. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Ventresca had 21 years of service credited under the plan and therefore would receive 46 weeks of pay under the plan for a termination for cause or by Mr. Ventresca for good reason as described in the plan and not associated with a change in control.

Termination by Us for Cause. If we terminate a Senior Executive’s employment for Cause, then:

PREIT will pay to him (less applicable withholding taxes) all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement;

he, his spouse and dependents will have rights under PREIT’s health plans as provided by COBRA; and

he will not engage in, have an interest in or in any way be affiliated with any entity that engages within 25 miles of any property owned by PREIT in any activity that competes with the activity of PREIT for one year following such termination.

Death or Disability. Under our employment agreement with each Senior Executive, if the Senior Executive dies during the term of his employment agreement, or if he is unable to perform his duties for 120 days during any 150 day period (“disability”) and PREIT elects to terminate his employment, then:

PREIT will pay to him or his estate (less applicable withholding taxes):

in the case of the disability of the Senior Executive, except Mr. Ronald Rubin, a cash lump sum payment equal to one times (two times in the case of Mr. Coradino) (x) his then-current base salary minus (y) amounts reasonably projected to be paid to the Senior Executive under disability insurance policies for the 12-month period immediately following the Senior Executive’s termination of employment (a 24-month period in the case of Mr. Coradino)(such amount being discounted to present value); in the case of Mr. Ronald Rubin’s disability, he would receive a cash lump sum founder’s retirement payment equal to $3,500,000;

in the case of the death of the Senior Executive, except Mr. Ronald Rubin, his base salary for a period of 12 months (24 months in the case of Mr. Coradino), paid in accordance with PREIT’s normal payroll practices; in the case of the death of Mr. Ronald Rubin, his estate would receive a cash lump sum founder’s retirement payment equal to $3,500,000;

all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement; and

if PREIT achieves its specified performance target(s), the pro rata portion of any amount payable under the annual cash incentive plan with respect to the year of termination that he would have earned had he remained employed with us;

all unvested restricted shares that vest solely based on the passage of time and the Senior Executive’s continued employment will vest; and

he, his spouse and dependents will continue to receive medical benefits for the 12-month period (a 24-month period in the case of Mr. Coradino and a 36-month period in the case of Mr. Ronald Rubin) immediately following his termination of employment to the extent PREIT was paying for such benefits prior to such death or disability.

Voluntary Termination. If a Senior Executive voluntarily terminates his employment, PREIT will pay to him (less applicable withholding taxes) all earned but unpaid amounts under his employment agreement, and he will have rights under PREIT’s health plans as provided by COBRA. If a Senior Executive voluntarily terminates his employment with PREIT (other than (i) for Good Reason, (ii) within 10 calendar days following the date that PREIT provides the Senior Executive with notice of his base salary and bonus eligibility for such fiscal year or (iii) (except for Mr. Coradino ) within 10 calendar days following April 10th of the applicable fiscal year, if such compensation notice has not been received as of that date), the Senior Executive will not engage in, have an interest in or in any way be affiliated with any entity that engages, within 25 miles of any property owned by PREIT, in any activity which competes with the activities of PREIT or its affiliates for one year following such termination.

In the case of Mr. Ronald Rubin, in the event of voluntary termination without good reason, he, his spouse and dependents would continue to receive medical benefits for the 36-month period after such termination. In the event of Mr. Rubin’s death during such period, such coverage would continue for his spouse and dependents. In addition, in the event of a voluntary termination, Mr. Rubin would receive a cash lump sum founder’s retirement payment equal to $3,500,000, he would receive any performance based cash incentive award earned as if his employment had not terminated, pro rata for the number of days he was employed during the year, all time based restricted shares would vest, and all performance based restricted share unit awards would remain outstanding and would vest or expire, in whole or in part, based on the applicable performance measures under the award as if his employment had not terminated.

Restricted Share Unit Programs. Under the Company’s performance based equity programs, if a Senior Executive’s employment, or the employment of Mr. Ventresca (together with the Senior Executives, each an “Executive”) is terminated by PREIT for a reason other than for Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason or because of the death or disability of the Executive, the Executive will remain eligible to receive shares under the applicable Restricted Share Unit Programs as if his employment had not terminated. If the Executive’s employment is terminated for any other reason, he forfeits his RSUs, except as otherwise discussed above for Mr. Ronald Rubin.

Change of Control. If there is a change of control of PREIT, then:

the measurement period for any outstanding RSUs would end on the date of the change of control, and shares underlying such awards will become payable, if at all, based on our relative TSR performance through that date;

any restricted shares will vest; and

if Mr. McCadden is required to pay any excise taxes imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, PREIT will reimburse Mr. McCadden for one-half of such taxes, provided that such reimbursement will not be grossed up to cover any excise, income or employment taxes assessed on that additional payment; if Mr. McCadden would receive a higher net after-tax benefit by the reduction of his payments and benefits to the minimum extent necessary to ensure that no such excise taxes apply, his payments and benefits shall be so reduced.

If a Senior Executive’s employment is terminated within six months before or 12 months after a change of control of PREIT, by us without Cause (including our election not to renew the agreement), or by him for Good Reason, then:

PREIT will pay to him (less applicable withholding taxes):

all earned but unpaid amounts under the employment agreement;

in the case of each Senior Executive other than Mr. Ronald Rubin, a lump sum cash payment equal to two times (three times in the case of Mr. Coradino) (x) his then-current base salary

(discounted to present value if such termination occurs within six months before the change of control) plus (y) an amount calculated by multiplying the then-current base salary by the average percentage of base salary paid as a bonus in the last three calendar years; Mr. Ronald Rubin would receive a cash lump sum founder’s retirement payment equal to $3,500,000; and

the Executive, his spouse and dependents will continue to receive medical benefits for one year (three years in the case of Mr. Ronald Rubin and two years in the case of Mr. Coradino) to the extent PREIT was paying for such benefits prior to termination.

If Mr. Ventresca is terminated following a change of control because (i) he is not offered a position with the successor company, he declines an offered position that is more than 50 miles from his primary residence (and at least 20 miles further from such residence than his current principal office), or (iii) he declines a position because the base salary of the position is less than he then-current base salary and/or the position does not include participation in a comparable bonus program, then PREIT will pay him (less applicable withholding taxes) an amount equal to 104 weeks of pay, plus an amount equal to the average of the last two bonuses that he received prior to his termination date, multiplies by two. If Mr. Ventresca is terminated prior to a change of control, his would be paid as discussed above under “Termination by Us Without Cause, Termination by a Senior Executive for Good Reason or Our Election Not to Renew the Employment Agreement Not Associated with a Change in Control.”

All Terminations of Employment

As described above under “—Employment Agreements,” the amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan of an Executive as of December 31, 2004 (plus earnings thereon) are payable within 60 days of the termination of employment for any reason. The amounts credited to the supplemental retirement plan of an Executive on and after January 1, 2005 are payable within 60 days of the termination (as defined in the employment agreement to effect compliance with or exemption from Section 409A of the Code) of employment for any reason, subject to a required delay for some payments pursuant to regulations under Section 409A of the Code. As these amounts are provided in the event of any termination of employment and are disclosed above, such amounts are not included in the amounts set forth in the tables below. See “—2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

Assuming Joseph F. Coradino’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2015 and/or there was a change of control of PREIT, and without taking into account any value assigned to Mr. Coradino’s covenant not compete, such payments and benefits would have had an estimated value of:

Joseph F. Coradino

 Lump  Sum(1)/
Base
Salary ($)
  Bonus ($)  Value of Accelerated
Equity and
Performance
Awards ($)
  Other(2)  ($)  Total ($) 
   Performance
Based
  Time
Based
   

Without Cause, Our Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Not Associated With a Change of Control

  786,575    1,039,154    2,726,510(3)   1,731,863    40,086    6,324,188  

Without Cause, Our Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Associated With a Change of Control

  2,175,000(4)   2,834,057    2,726,510    1,731,863    40,086    9,507,516  

Death

  1,450,000    906,250    2,726,510(3)   1,731,863    40,086    6,854,709  

Disability

  1,063,457    906,250    2,726,510(3)   1,731,863    40,086    6,468,166  

Change of Control (without regard to a termination of employment)

  0    0    2,726,510    1,731,863    0    4,458,373  

(1)The amounts set forth in this column are paid in a lump sum upon the occurrence of a listed event, provided that the payment of the amount payable upon the termination of Mr. Coradino’s employment in the case of his death will instead be made as a base salary continuation over the 24 month period following his death.

(2)The amounts shown in this column represent amounts in respect of benefit continuation.

(3)Represents the value of shares under any RSU program in effect that would have been received by the Executive (or his estate) if the applicable Measurement Period had ended on December 31, 2015 based on our relative TSR performance through, and the closing price as of, that date, and assuming that the relative performance and the price remained the same at the end of the actual Measurement Period.

(4)Assumes termination occurs within 12 months after a change of control. If termination occurs within six months prior to a change of control, the Executive would receive an amount in respect of base salary of $2,145,206.

Assuming that Ronald Rubin’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2015 and/or there was a change of control of PREIT, and without taking into account any value assigned to Mr. Ronald Rubin’s covenant not to compete, such payments and benefits would have had an estimated value of:

Ronald Rubin

 Lump
Sum ($)
  Bonus ($)  Value of Accelerated
Equity and
Performance
Awards ($)
  Benefit
Continuation ($)
  Total ($) 
   Performance
Based
  Time
Based
   

Without Cause, Either Party’s Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Not Associated With a Change of Control

  3,500,000    0    306,670(1)   261,587    60,130    4,128,387  

Without Cause, Either Party’s Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Associated With a Change of Control

  3,500,000    0    306,670    261,587    60,130    4,128,387  

Death

  3,500,000    0    306,670(1)   261,587    60,130    4,128,387  

Disability

  3,500,000    0    306,670(1)   261,587    60,130    4,128,387  

Change of Control (without regard to a termination of employment)

  0    0    306,670    261,587    0    568,257  

(1)Represents the value of shares under any RSU program in effect that would have been received by the Executive (or his estate) if the applicable Measurement Period had ended on December 31, 2015 based on our TSR performance through, and the closing price as of, that date, and assuming that the relative performance and the price remained the same at the end of the actual Measurement Period.

Assuming Robert F. McCadden’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2015 and/or there was a change of control of PREIT, and without taking into account any value assigned to Mr. McCadden’s covenant not to compete, such payments and benefits would have had an estimated value of:

Robert F. McCadden

 Base
Salary ($)
  Bonus ($)  Value of Accelerated
Equity and
Performance
Awards ($)
  Other ($)  Total ($) 
   Performance
Based
  Time
Based
   

Without Cause, Our Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Not Associated With a Change of Control

  945,829    744,425    1,370,078(1)   831,476    18,441    3,910,249  

Without Cause, Our Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Associated With a Change of Control

  969,436(2)   744,425    1,370,078    831,476    18,441    3,933,856  

Death

  484,718    387,774    1,370,078(1)   831,476    18,441    3,092,487  

Disability

  300,097    387,774    1,370,078(1)   831,476    18,441    2,908,676  

Change of Control (without regard to a termination of employment)

  0    0    1,370,078    831,476    0    2,201,554  

(1)Represents the value of shares under any RSU program in effect that would have been received by the Executive (or his estate) if the applicable Measurement Period had ended on December 31, 2015 based on our TSR performance through, and the closing price as of, that date, and assuming that the relative performance and the price remained the same at the end of the actual Measurement Period.

(2)Assumes termination occurs within 12 months after a change of control. If termination occurs within six months prior to a change of control, the Executive would receive the base salary amount listed in the row “Without Cause or For Good Reason Not Associated With a Change of Control.”

Assuming Bruce Goldman’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2015 and/or there was a change of control of PREIT, and without taking into account any value assigned to Mr. Goldman’s covenant not to compete, such payments and benefits would have had an estimated value of:

Bruce Goldman

 Base
Salary ($)
  Bonus ($)  Value of Accelerated
Equity and
Performance
Awards ($)
  Other ($)  Total ($) 
   Performance
Based
  Time
Based
   

Without Cause, Our Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Not Associated With a Change of Control

  740,404    595,052    640,055(1)   420,604    18,441    2,414,556  

Without Cause, Our Election Not to Renew Employment Agreement, or For Good Reason Associated With a Change of Control

  758,884(2)   595,052    640,055    420,604    18,441    2,433,036  

Death

  379,442    303,554    640,055(1)   420,604    18,441    1,762,096  

Disability

  196,948    303,554    640,055(1)   420,604    18,441    1,579,602  

Change of Control (without regard to a termination of employment)

  0    0    640,055    420,604    0    1,060,659  

(1)Represents the value of shares under any RSU program in effect that would have been received by the Executive (or his estate) if the applicable Measurement Period had ended on December 31, 2015 based on our TSR performance through, and the closing price as of, that date, and assuming that the relative performance and the price remained the same at the end of the actual Measurement Period.

(2)Assumes termination occurs within 12 months after a change of control. If termination occurs within six months prior to a change of control, the Executive would receive the base salary amount listed in the row “Without Cause or For Good Reason Not Associated With a Change of Control.”

Assuming Mario C. Ventresca Jr.’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2015 and/or there was a change of control of PREIT, and without taking into account any value assigned to Mr. Ventresca’s separation agreement and release, such payments and benefits would have had an estimated value of:

Mario C. Ventresca, Jr.

 Base
Salary ($)
  Bonus ($)  Value of Accelerated
Equity and
Performance
Awards ($)
  Other ($)  Total ($) 
   Performance
Based
  Time
Based
   

Without Cause or For Good Reason Not Associated With a Change of Control

  269,809    0    255,567(1)   249,143    16,940    791,459  

Without Cause or For Good Reason Associated With a Change of Control

  610,002    565,000    255,567    249,143    36,881    1,716,583  

Death

  0    0    255,567(1)   249,143    0    504,710  

Disability

  0    0    255,567(1)   249,143    0    504,710  

Change of Control (without regard to a termination of employment)

  0    0    255,567    249,143    0    504,710  

(1)Represents the value of shares under any RSU program in effect that would have been received by the Executive (or his estate) if the applicable Measurement Period had ended on December 31, 2015 based on our TSR performance through, and the closing price as of, that date, and assuming that the relative performance and the price remained the same at the end of the actual Measurement Period.

Equity Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes PREIT’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015:2021:

 

Plan category

 Number of shares
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 Number of shares
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans(1)(3)
   Number of shares
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 Number of shares
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans(1)(3)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

  10,000(2)  $16.63    1,222,784     1,085,852(2)  $20.40(4)  1,518,496 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders(5)

  0    0    0     0  0  0 

Total

  10,000(2)  $16.63    1,222,784     1,085,852(2)  $20.40  1,518,496 

 

(1)

Does not include shares reflected in the column entitled “Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights.”

 

(2)

Does not include restricted shares2,325,051 PSUs (reflected at target) awarded under PREIT’s Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan or the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan that were outstanding and unvested at December 31, 2015.2021. The actual number of shares issued in connection with earned PSUs will be determined based on achievement of performance-based measures and, accordingly, these could pay out at a number of shares from 0% to 240% of this represented target for the PSUs. Does not include 2,188,876 time-based RSUs that may be settled in shares or cash as determined by the Compensation Committee as the Company currently expects these awards will be settled in cash.

54    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  COMPENSATION  

 

(3)

Includes 1,158,1491,300,420 shares available for awards under PREIT’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2021, including shares that might become issuable pursuant to the Company’s PSU programs or time-based RSUs and 218,076 shares available for issuance under PREIT’s Employee Share Purchase Plan. This number has not been reduced by 2,325,051 PSUs (reflected at target) awarded under PREIT’s Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan as ofor the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan that were outstanding and unvested at December 31, 2015, including2021, or by 2,188,876 time based RSUs that may be settled in shares that might become issuableor cash as determined by the Compensation Committee as the Company currently expects these awards will be settled in cash.

(4)

Reflects the exercise price of outstanding stock options. Other outstanding awards have no exercise price.

(5)

Does not include outstanding cash-settled, time-based RSUs or associated Outperformance Units granted to Mr. Coradino pursuant to the Company’s RSU Programs, and 64,635 shares available for issuance under PREIT’s Employee Share Purchase Plan.Coradino Award Agreement as those may only be settled in cash.

AUDIT

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    55


LOGO

AUDIT

PROPOSAL TO BE VOTED ON BY COMMON SHAREHOLDERS—PROPOSAL THREE—

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORRatification of Selection of Independent Auditor

The Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees has selected KPMGBDO USA LLP (“BDO”) as PREIT’s independent auditor to perform the audit of our financial statements for 2016. KPMG2022. BDO is a registered independent public accounting firm and served as our independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2015.firm. A representative of KPMGBDO is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and available to respond to appropriate questions, and will be given an opportunity to make a statement, if the representative so desires.

Although shareholder ratification of our selection of KPMGBDO as our independent auditor is not required by our by-laws or otherwise, the Board of Trustees is submitting the selection of KPMGBDO to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. Despite ratification, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of PREIT. If KPMGBDO is not ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select as our independent auditor any registered public accounting firm that it determines would be in the best interest of PREIT.

Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) previously served as PREIT’s independent registered public accounting firm through the fiscal year 2021. On March 14, 2022 KPMG was notified that it would be dismissed from that role. The dismissal of KPMG became effective immediately upon the filing of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, which occurred on March 15, 2022. Representatives of KPMG are not expected to be present at the annual meeting, and as such, will not be available to respond to any questions.

The audit reports of KPMG on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that KPMG’s report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 contained a separate paragraph stating that the Company has identified an issue that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the subsequent interim period through March 14, 2022, there were no (1) disagreements within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions between the Company and KPMG on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures which, if not resolved to KPMG’s satisfaction, would have caused KPMG to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement, or (2) “reportable events” within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, except for:

The material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as disclosed in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 related to (i) identifying and assessing risks of misstatement to ensure management review controls are designed, implemented, and operating at a level to effectively respond to those risks, (ii) monitoring the consistent operation of internal control over financial reporting and remediation of known control deficiencies, and (iii) evaluating the reliability of information used in management review controls.

The material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as disclosed in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to (i) attracting and retaining sufficient personnel with requisite financial expertise, (ii) the assessment of the risk of fraud, including risks of management override of controls and proper segregation of duties, and (iii) assessing changes in the external environment and the potential impact of those changes on the design, operating effectiveness and monitoring of internal controls over financial reporting.

The Company’s management and Audit Committee discussed the material weaknesses in the internal control over financial reporting with KPMG. The Company has authorized KPMG to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor accountant concerning the material weaknesses.

As required, PREIT provided KPMG with a copy of the above disclosures and requested that KPMG furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of KPMG’s letter, dated March 18, 2022, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2022.

56    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  AUDIT  

The Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees engaged in a competitive request for proposals process to determine PREIT’s independent registered public accounting firm for PREIT’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. On March 14, 2022, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of BDO as PREIT’s independent registered public accounting firm for PREIT’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, and notified KPMG that it would be dismissed from that role.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the subsequent interim period through March 14, 2022, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has consulted with BDO regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that BDO concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement (within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304); or (iii) any reportable event (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Board Recommendation

The Audit Committee of our Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders vote FOR the ratification of PREIT’s selection of KPMGBDO as PREIT’s independent auditor to perform the audit of our financial statements for 2016.2022.

Audit Committee Report

PREIT’s Audit Committee is governed by an amended and restated charter that was originally approved and adopted by PREIT on April 14, 2004. PREIT’sThe Board of Trustees has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and independent under New York Stock ExchangeNYSE listing rules and independent under PREIT’s own independence guidelines. Each member of the Audit Committee also meets the SEC’s additional independence requirements for audit committee members. In addition, PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees has determined that John J. Roberts is anand George J. Alburger, Jr. are both “audit committee financial expert,experts,” as defined by SEC rules.

PREIT’s management has primary responsibility for PREIT’s financial statements. KPMG, LLP, PREIT’s independent auditor for 2015,2021, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of PREIT’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. Before PREIT’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152021 was filed with the SEC, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG the audited financial statements of PREIT for the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, which included the consolidated balance sheets of PREIT as of December 31, 20152021 and 2014,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,loss, equity and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in thetwo-year period ended December 31, 2015,2021, and the notes thereto. In connection with this review, the Audit Committee, among other things, made inquiries of PREIT’s internal auditor and KPMG with respect to the reliability and integrity of PREIT’s accounting policies and financial reporting practices, and reviewed with KPMG its views on the quality of PREIT’s implementation of accounting principles, disclosure practices and use of accounting estimates in preparing the financial statements.

The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 16,(“PCAOB”) and the SEC, which includes, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of PREIT’s financial statements. The Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with KPMG its independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to PREIT’sthe Board of Trustees that PREIT’s audited financial statements be included in PREIT’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2021.

SUBMITTED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

George J. Alburger, Jr., Chair

John J. Roberts Chair

Rosemarie B. GrecoMark E. Pasquerilla

Donald F. MazziottiJoAnne A. Epps

Charles P. Pizzi

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    57


  AUDIT  

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

In accordance with the SEC’s auditor independence rules, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to us by our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval

In accordance with the SEC’s auditor independence rules, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to us by our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority between meetings of the Audit Committee to the Chair of the Audit Committee. The fees listed in the table below were properly pre-approved. The Audit Committee or its Chair considered the nature of the non-audit services provided by KPMG and determined that those services were compatible with the provision of independent audit services by KPMG.

Additional Information Regarding Our Independent Auditors

In addition to engaging BDO to audit PREIT’s consolidated financial statements, PREIT may retain BDO to provide other auditing and advisory services. PREIT understands the need for BDO to maintain objectivity and independence in its audit of PREIT’s financial statements.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services by KPMG in 2021 and 2020 for these various services were:

Type of Fees

  2021($)   2020($) 

Audit Fees

   1,838,097    1,205,000 

Audit-Related Fees

        

Tax Fees

   67,700    109,665 

All Other Fees

        
  

 

 

 

Total

   

1,905,797

    1,314,665 

In the table above, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees PREIT paid KPMG for professional services for the audit of PREIT’s consolidated financial statements included in PREIT’s Form 10-K, review of financial statements included in PREIT’s Forms 10-Q, including transaction reviews, and for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with the review of other filings and consents and comfort letters; and “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax preparation and other tax consultation related to transactions consummated by PREIT during 2021 and 2020.

58    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


LOGO

OUTSTANDING PREFERRED SHARES PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL TO BE VOTED ON BY ONLY PREFERRED SHAREHOLDERS—Outstanding Preferred Shares Trustees Election

General

Pursuant to the terms of the Designating Amendments, holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares are entitled to receive, when, as and if authorized by the Board of Trustees and declared by PREIT, out of the funds of the Company legally available therefor, cash dividends payable in equal quarterly installments. The terms of the Designating Amendments further provide that, if and whenever six quarterly dividends are in arrears, the number of members of the Company’s Board of Trustees will be increased by two and the holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares, voting separately as a class, will have the right to vote and elect these two additional trustees. PREIT is restricted under the terms of its credit facilities from paying dividends on its Outstanding Preferred Shares. Accordingly, for six consecutive quarters, the sixth quarter being the fourth quarter of 2021, the Board of Trustees has not declared quarterly cash dividends on PREIT’s Outstanding Preferred Shares for which the Outstanding Preferred Shares are entitled and owed. Thus, in accordance with the Designating Amendments, PREIT’s Board of Trustees will be increased by two, and the holders of the Outstanding Preferred Shares, voting together as a separate, single class, have the right to elect two additional trustees to the Board of Trustees at an annual meeting of shareholders or a properly called special meeting of the holders of the Outstanding Preferred Shares. This right will continue at every annual meeting of shareholders until PREIT has paid all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Outstanding Preferred Shares in full and the dividends for the then current dividend period have been paid in full or declared and set apart for payment in full, at which time the right is terminated.

Preferred Nominees for the Office of Trustee

The Company has received notices of nomination from each of Cygnus Property Fund V, LLC (“Cygnus V”), and certain of its affiliates nominating Ryan J. Levenson and Christopher Swann, and Kenneth B. Hart nominating himself, to serve as the preferred trustees. On March 25, 2022, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Cygnus V, pursuant to which the Company agreed to include Christopher Swann and Kenneth Hart in the Company’s proxy materials as the preferred trustees for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. Effective upon the filing of the Company’s proxy materials in accordance with the letter agreement, Cygnus V agreed to withdraw its previous nomination of Ryan J. Levenson to serve as one of the two additional trustees that may be elected by the holders of the Outstanding Preferred Shares at the Annual Meeting.

Cygnus V and its affiliates have further agreed to vote all of their Outstanding Preferred Shares that they have the right to vote (or direct to vote) at the Annual Meeting in favor of Mr. Swann and Mr. Hart to serve as the preferred trustees and against any shareholder nominees for preferred trustee that are not Mr. Swann or Mr. Hart. Cygnus V also agreed that, without the prior written consent of the Board, it would not nominate or recommend any person for election as a trustee of the Board other than Mr. Swann or Mr. Hart, commence any “withhold” or other campaign, or submit any proposals with respect to the Annual Meeting.

Both Mr. Swann and Mr. Hart have consented to be named in this proxy statement, and if elected, to serve on the Board of Trustees. More information on each nominee is provided below.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    59


  PREFERRED TRUSTEES  

Christopher Swann

LOGO

Age: 51

Number of Public Company Boards: 0

Background

Christopher Swann, 51, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cygnus Capital, Inc. (“Cygnus”), a real estate and alternative asset investment management company, since 2013. Previously, Mr. Swann served at SAC Capital Advisors LLC, an investment management company, where he served as a Portfolio Manager, from 2008 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Swann served in a number of roles at GMT Capital Corporation, an investment management company, including serving as a senior analyst and then as a portfolio manager overseeing investments in technology companies as well as building out the firm’s investments in Asia, including establishing its Hong Kong office. Prior to that, Mr. Swann co-founded two software companies and also worked as an Associate at McKinsey & Co. in the Business Technology practices in Atlanta, GA and Germany. Earlier in his career, Mr. Swann served in senior marketing and sales positions in Germany and Russia for Millicom International Cellular SA (NASDAQ:TIGO), an international telecommunications and media company, and for a division of Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK), a multinational pharmaceutical company. Mr. Swann received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Political Science and Public Policy from Duke University and he received a dual Masters in Business Administration and Masters of Arts in International Studies degree from The Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

Qualifications and Experience Relevant To Us

Mr. Swann’s has a strong background in operations, company formation, restructuring of distressed commercial real estate and real estate backed debt, and capital markets, as well as a shareholder mindset as the beneficial owner of a significant amount of the Audit Committee toOutstanding Preferred.

Kenneth B. Hart

LOGO

Age: 69

Number of Public

Company Boards: 0

Background

Kenneth B. Hart, 69, has been the Chairsole proprietor and Principal of the Audit Committee. The fees listedHart Capital Management, a value-oriented investor focused mainly on real estate related entities, since 1990. At Hart Capital Management, his focus was initially focused on publicly traded junk bonds, and has transitioned into purchasing limited partnership interests in sponsored real estate partnerships in the table below were properly pre-approved. The Audit Committee or its Chair consideredsecondary market and making investments in publicly traded REITs. As sole proprietor, this has included serving as director and executive officer. Mr. Hart received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, as well as a Masters in Business Administration from the natureUniversity of the non-audit services provided by KPMG and determined that those services were compatible with the provision of independent audit services by KPMG.

Additional Information Regarding Our Independent Auditors

In addition to retaining KPMG to audit PREIT’s consolidated financial statements for 2015, PREIT retained KPMG to provide other auditing and advisory services in 2015. PREIT understands the need for KPMG to maintain objectivity and independence in its audit of PREIT’s financial statements.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services by KPMG in 2015 and 2014 for these various services were:California, Berkeley.

 

Type of Fees

  2015   2014 

Audit Fees

  $783,800    $837,700  

Audit-Related Fees

   0     39,000  

Tax Fees

   176,900     132,100  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $960,780    $1,008,800  

In the table above, in accordance with the SecuritiesQualifications and Exchange Commission’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees PREIT paid KPMG for professional services for the audit of PREIT’s consolidated financial statements included in PREIT’s Form10-K, review of financial statements included in PREIT’s Forms 10-Q, including transaction reviews, and for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with the review of other filings and consents; “audit-related fees” are fees for comfort letters and for work performed in connection with S-3 and S-8 registration statements and prospectus supplements thereunder; and “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax preparation and other tax consultation related to transactions consummated by PREIT during 2015 and 2014.

OTHER MATTERSExperience Relevant To Us

PROPOSAL FOUR—

OTHER MATTERS

PREIT’s management knowsMr. Hart has been a real estate investor for over 30 years, which has included development financing, investments in distressed properties, negotiating with borrowers, buying real estate limited partnership interests and investing in publicly traded REITs. Mr. Hart also has experience with financing below-investment grade companies and financial analysis of no matters other than those stated above to come before the meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting, the enclosed proxy confers discretionary authority with respect to those matters.listed corporations.

Principal Security Holders

Mr. Swann is President and Chief Executive Officer of Cygnus, which is the general partner of Cygnus Property Fund V, LLC, the holder of Outstanding Preferred Shares that has nominated Mr. Swann to be a trustee of the Board. Kenneth B. Hart is the nominating shareholder and has nominated himself to serve as trustee. Vaughn D. Hart, Kenneth B. Hart’s brother, has agreed to vote his shares for Kenneth B. Hart.

If elected, Mr. Swann and Mr. Hart would continue to serve as a trustee until the earlier of (a) the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders and their successors are duly elected and qualified, or (b) such time as all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Outstanding Preferred Shares have been paid in full and the dividends for the then current dividend period have been paid in full or declared and set apart for payment in full.

60    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


  PREFERRED TRUSTEES  

Required Vote

Each holder of Outstanding Preferred Shares will be entitled to one vote per share. The voting standards described in the “Governance—Majority Voting Standard for Trustee Elections and Board Procedures” section on page 11 will apply to the election of trustees nominated and elected by the holders of Outstanding Preferred Shares, voting as a single class. The two nominees nominated by holders of the Outstanding Preferred Shares receiving the highest number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be elected trustees, subject to the majority voting provisions of our corporate governance guidelines described above.

Recommendation

The Board of Trustees does not make a recommendation in favor of or against the election of Christopher Swann and Kenneth B. Hart as trustees.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    61


LOGO

OTHER MATTERS

Other Matters

PREIT’s management knows of no matters other than those stated above to come before the meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxy being solicited in connection with this Proxy Statement confers discretionary authority with respect to those matters.

Principal Security Holders

The following table shows information concerning beneficial ownership of PREIT’s common shares and Outstanding Preferred Shares by the only persons known by PREIT to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of PREIT’s common shares of beneficial interest or more than 5% of PREIT’s Outstanding Preferred Shares, primarily based on PREIT’s review of publicly available filings made with the SEC by such persons:

   Common Shares                                               Preferred Shares         

  Name and

  Address of

  Beneficial

  Owner

 Number of
Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
  Percent
of Class
of
Common
Shares
  Number
of
Series B
Preferred
Shares
  Percent
of
Class of
Series B
Preferred
Shares
  Number
of
Series C
Preferred
Shares
  Percent
of
Class of
Series C
Preferred
Shares
  Number of
Series D
Preferred
Shares
  Percent of
Class of
Series D
Preferred
Shares
  

Number of

Total
Preferred
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned

  

Percent of

Class of
Total
Preferred
Outstanding
Shares

 

  Zhengxu He(1)

Inst. Of Math, AMSS, CAS, ZHONGGUANCUN

Haidian District,

Beijing 100080, PRC

  6,721,485   8.3  0   *   0   *   0   *   0   * 

  John R. Saunders(2)

4040 MacArthur Blvd.
Suite 300
Newport Beach,

CA 92660

  8,010,000   9.9  0   *   0   *   0   *   0   * 

  Christopher Swann(3)

3060 Peachtree Road NW, Suite 1080, Atlanta, Georgia 30305

  1,636,466   2.0  306,048   8.9  379,228   5.5  357,591   7.2  1,042,867   6.8

(1)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 7, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, Zhengxu He had shared voting power and shared dispositive power over the 6,721,485 shares reported.

(2)

Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on February 18, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, John R. Saunders had shared voting power and shared dispositive power over the 8,010,000 shares reported. The shares are held in various entities with which Mr. Saunders is affiliated, including 17422 Derian L.P., 2771 Garey L.P., GS Building, L.P., Saunders Property, LLC, S.F. Property, L.P., and in his capacity as trustee of John R. Saunders Trust dated 7/14/87.

(3)

Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 28, 2022. As of March 28, 2022, Christopher Swann had sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 1,000 Common Shares and 4,000 shares of Series D Preferred Shares. Christopher Swann had shared voting power and shared dispositive power over all the remaining listed common shares and Outstanding Preferred Shares reported. The shares are held in various entities with which Mr. Swann is affiliated, including Cygnus Opportunity Fund, LLC, Cygnus Property Fund IV, LLC, Cygnus V, Cygnus Property Fund VI, LLC, Cygnus Capital Advisers, LLC, Cygnus General Partners, LLC, Cygnus Capital Real Estate Advisors II, LLC, and Cygnus (together, the “Cygnus Group”). Mr. Swann may be deemed to be a member of a “group” with the other members of the Cygnus Group for the purposes of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act and the group may be deemed to beneficially own the listed common shares and Outstanding Preferred Shares. Each member of the Cygnus Group, including Mr. Swann, disclaims beneficial ownership of PREIT’sthe common shares byor Outstanding Preferred Shares that he or it does not directly own. Mr. Swann and the only persons known by PREITlisted entities are party to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of PREIT’s common shares of beneficial interest basedthat certain Joint Filing Agreement, entered into on PREIT’s review of publicly available filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission by such persons:March 28, 2022.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership as of Date
of Applicable SEC Filing
  Percent of Outstanding Shares
as of December 31, 2015

Cohen & Steers, Inc.(1)

280 Park Avenue, 10th floor
New York, NY 10017

  12,337,049  17.8%

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355

  10,311,584  14.9%

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022

  8,265,509  11.9%

CBRE Clarion Securities, LLC(4)

201 King of Prussia Road, Suite 600
Radnor, PA 19087

  3,779,298  5.5%

(1)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, Cohen & Steers, Inc. had sole voting power over 10,401,431 of the shares reported and sole dispositive power over all 12,337,049 of the shares reported. Of these shares, Cohen and Steers Capital Management, Inc. held 12,252,567 shares, approximately 17.71% of the outstanding shares.

 

(2)Based on two Schedules 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016 and February 9, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, the Vanguard Group, Inc. had sole voting power over 184,587 of the shares reported and sole dispositive power over 10,167,439 of the shares reported. Of these shares, Vanguard Specialized Funds-Vanguard REIT Index Fund held 4,978,981 shares, approximately 7.19% of the outstanding shares and had sole voting power with respect to these shares.

 

(3)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 8, 2016. BlackRock Inc. has sole voting power over 8,087,051 of the shares reported and sole dispositive power over all 8,265,509 of the shares reported. The shares are held in various BlackRock subsidiaries including BlackRock Japan Co. Ltd., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd, BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. and BlackRock International Limited. Of these subsidiaries, only BlackRock Fund Advisors individually owns 5% or more of the outstanding shares.

62    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO

(4)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, CBRE Clarion Securities, LLC had sole voting power over 2,596,898 of the shares reported and sole dispositive power over all 3,779,298 of the shares reported.

Related Party Transactions Policy

The PREIT related party transactions policy requires that related party transactions be reviewed and approved or ratified by a special committee comprised of independent trustees. The Board of Trustees has appointed M. Walter D’Alessio, Chair, Leonard I. Korman and Mark E. Pasquerilla as the members of the Special Committee. Any member of the Special Committee with an interest in a related party transaction will not vote on the approval or ratification of that transaction, but may participate, to the extent requested by the Chair of the Special Committee, in the Special Committee’s consideration of that transaction.

Related parties that are covered by the policy include any executive officer, trustee, nominee for trustee or 5% shareholder of PREIT, any immediate family member of those persons, any entity that is owned or controlled by any of the foregoing persons or any entity in which such a person is an executive officer or has a substantial ownership interest. “Related party transaction” means any transaction or series of similar transactions and any material amendment or modification to such a transaction:

involving an amount of at least $120,000 in which PREIT is a participant and in which a related party will have a direct or indirect material interest; and

that occurred subsequent to the adoption of the policy and has not previously been approved or ratified pursuant to the policy.

The related party transactions policy expressly excepts certain ordinary course transactions from the review, approval and ratification requirements of the policy.

The related party transactions policy requires executive officers and trustees of PREIT to notify PREIT’s General Counsel as soon as reasonably practicable of any potential related party transaction. PREIT’s General Counsel then determines whether the transaction requires compliance with the related party transactions policy. If the transaction is a related party transaction, full details of the transaction are submitted to the Special Committee. The Special Committee will then determine whether to ratify or approve the transaction. The Special Committee considers, among other things:

the terms of the transaction and whether the terms are fair to PREIT and are on the same basis as if the transaction did not involve a related party;

the reasons for PREIT to enter into the transaction;

whether the transaction would impair the independence of a non-employee trustee;

whether the transaction presents an improper conflict for any trustee or executive officer of PREIT; and

the materiality of the transaction.

PREIT’s 2012 amendment to its office lease with an entity in which certain of its officers/trustees have an interest, discussed below, was approved pursuant to PREIT’s related party transactions policy. Except as described below, none of the other transactions described below under “—Other Transactions and Matters” were reviewed, ratified or approved pursuant to PREIT’s related party transactions policy because each of the transactions was either entered into before PREIT adopted the policy or is not considered to be a related party

transaction under the terms of the policy. Each of the transactions described below were, to the extent deemed necessary and appropriate by the Board of Trustees, reviewed and approved by PREIT’s Board of Trustees, the Special Committee and/or, as appropriate, the independent or non-employee members of PREIT’s Board of Trustees.

Other Transactions and Matters

During 2015, PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. provided management, leasing and development services for seven properties owned by partnerships and other entities in which Ronald Rubin, together with members of his immediate family and affiliated entities, have significant ownership interests. Effective December 31, 2015, our management, leasing and development services for five of these properties were terminated, and the services for one additional property were terminated in 2016. Total revenue earned by PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. for such services was $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.

PREIT leases its principal executive offices from Bellevue Associates, an entity in which Ronald Rubin has an interest. In April 2012, we entered into an amendment to our office lease with the landlord, effective June 1, 2012. Under this amendment, we consolidated from approximately 68,100 square feet into approximately 58,000 square feet. The term has been extended for five years to October 31, 2019, and we have the option to renew the amended office lease for up to two additional periods for an aggregate of 10 years, at the then-current market base rental rate calculated in accordance with the terms of the amended office lease. The first extension period shall be no less than three and no more than seven years, at our discretion, and the second shall be for 10 years less the number of years of the first extension. The base rent will be approximately $1.2 million per year, increasing incrementally to approximately $1.4 million in 2019. PREIT’s total rent expense in 2015 was approximately $1.3 million. Ronald Rubin, together with members of his immediate family and affiliated entities, owns approximately a 50% interest in Bellevue Associates.

Ronald Rubin’s nephew, Daniel Rubin, was employed by a subsidiary of PREIT in 2015. Daniel Rubin is Vice President—Anchor Leasing of PREIT and his annual salary in 2015 was approximately $164,000 and in 2016 is approximately $167,000. In addition, Daniel Rubin received 2,010 restricted shares in 2015 valued at approximately $47,000 and he received commissions of approximately $76,000 for leasing activity in 2015.

Incorporation by Reference

The information contained in this Proxy Statement under the headings “Compensation Committee Report” and “Audit Committee Report” is not “soliciting material,” nor is it “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that PREIT specifically incorporates such information by reference in a filing.

Shareholders’ Proposals

Under SEC rules, certain shareholder proposals may be included in PREIT’s proxy statement. Any shareholder desiring to have such a proposal included in PREIT’s proxy statement for the annual meeting to be held in 2017 must deliver a proposal in full compliance with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to PREIT’s executive offices by December 21, 2016.

Where a shareholder submits a proposal outside of the process described in Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the shareholder must comply with the procedures set forth in our trust agreement. The written proposal must be received by our Secretary on or before March 4, 2017 but no earlier than February 2, 2017 (unless our annual meeting is not within 30 days of the anniversary of the prior annual meeting, and then not later than the tenth business day following the date on which notice of the meeting was mailed or disclosed to

the public, whichever occurs first). The notice to our Secretary must contain or be accompanied by the information required by Section 11.J of our trust agreement and must include, among other things: (i) the name and address of the shareholder intending to bring the business before the meeting; (ii) a representation as to the class, series and number of shares that such shareholder owns of record or beneficially and the respective date or dates on which such shareholder acquired such ownership; (iii) a description of all proxies, agreements, arrangements or understandings between the proposing shareholder and any other person or entity (naming each such person or entity) pursuant to which such shareholder has any right to vote any shares; (iv) the general nature of the business which such shareholder seeks to bring before the meeting and the text of the resolution or resolutions which the shareholder proposes that the shareholders adopt; (v) any material interest in such business by such shareholder, including any anticipated benefit; and (vi) with respect to such shareholder or affiliate of such shareholder, whether and the extent to which any hedging or other transaction or series of transactions has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding (including, without limitation, any put, short position, hedged position, borrowing or lending of shares, synthetic or temporary ownership technique, swap, securities loan, option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or any other right or security with a value derived, in part or in whole, from the value of any class or series of shares, directly or indirectly owned by such shareholder or affiliate of such shareholder) has been made, the effect or intent of which is to (A) mitigate loss to, or manage the risk or benefit of share price changes for, or to increase or decrease the voting power of, such shareholder or any affiliate of such shareholder with respect to any shares, or (B) provide the shareholder or affiliate of such shareholder with an opportunity to receive directly or indirectly any gain from an increase or decrease in the value of the shares. In addition, the notice must be signed by a shareholder or shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting and holding, individually or collectively, at least two percent of the shares outstanding on the date of such notice. A copy of the full text of the relevant section of the trust agreement, which includes the complete list of the information that must be submitted to us before a shareholder may submit a proposal at the 2017


  OTHER MATTERS  

Related Party Transactions Policy

The PREIT related party transactions policy was amended in 2021. The policy requires that related party transactions be reviewed and approved (or ratified), and under certain circumstances are subject to ongoing oversight, by a special committee comprised of independent trustees. The Special Committee currently consists of Charles Pizzi, Chair, Michael J. DeMarco, and JoAnne A. Epps. Any member of the Special Committee with an interest in a related party transaction will not vote on the approval or ratification of that transaction, but may participate, to the extent requested by the Chair of the Special Committee, in the Special Committee’s consideration of that transaction.

Related parties that are covered by the policy include any executive officer, trustee, nominee for trustee or 5% shareholder of PREIT, any immediate family member of those persons, any entity that is owned or controlled by any of the foregoing persons or any entity in which such a person is an executive officer or has a substantial ownership interest. “Related party transaction” means any transaction or series of similar transactions and any material amendment or modification to such a transaction:

involving an amount of at least $120,000 in which PREIT is a participant and in which a related party will have a direct or indirect material interest; and

that occurred subsequent to the adoption of the policy and has not previously been approved or ratified pursuant to the policy.

The related party transactions policy expressly excepts certain ordinary course transactions from the review, approval and ratification requirements of the policy.

The related party transactions policy requires executive officers, trustees or nominees for trustee of PREIT to notify PREIT’s General Counsel as soon as reasonably practicable of any potential related party transaction. PREIT’s General Counsel then determines whether the transaction requires compliance with the related party transactions policy. If the transaction is a related party transaction, full details of the transaction are submitted to the Special Committee. The Special Committee will then conduct a reasonable review in order to determine whether to approve (or ratify) and, to the extent applicable, provide ongoing oversight for the transaction. The Special Committee considers, among other things:

the terms of the transaction and whether the terms are fair to PREIT and are on the same basis as if the transaction did not involve a related party;

the reasons for PREIT to enter into the transaction;

whether the transaction would impair the independence of a non-employee trustee;

whether the transaction presents an improper conflict for any trustee or executive officer of PREIT; and

the materiality of the transaction.

If management becomes aware of an existing related party transactions that has not previously been approved by the Special Committee, management will provide full details of the transaction, as well as when management became aware of the transaction, to the Special Committee as soon as practicable. The Special Committee will then determine whether to ratify the transaction.

The Special Committee will not approve (or ratify) a related party transaction unless the Special Committee has determined in good faith that the transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of PREIT and its shareholders. Additionally, for transactions that are expected to continue for a period of time, ongoing oversight will be instituted by the Special Committee on at least an annual or more frequent basis, with the Special Committee reviewing whether the transaction continues to meet the standards for approval or ratification.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Michael J. DeMarco, a trustee, filed a delinquent Form 4 during 2021. Mr. DeMarco executed sales of shares from April 16, 2021 through April 20, 2021 that were not reported on a Form 4 until April 23, 2021.

LOGO     2022 Proxy Statement    63


  OTHER MATTERS  

Incorporation by Reference

The information contained in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Audit Committee Report” is not “soliciting material,” nor is it “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that PREIT specifically incorporates such information by reference in a filing.

Shareholders’ Proposals

Under SEC rules, certain shareholder proposals may be included in PREIT’s proxy statement. Any shareholder desiring to have such a proposal included in PREIT’s proxy statement for the annual meeting to be held in 2023 must deliver a proposal in full compliance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act to PREIT’s executive offices at One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, by December 23, 2022.

Where a shareholder submits a proposal outside of the process described in Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the shareholder must comply with the procedures set forth in our trust agreement. The written proposal must be received by our Secretary on or before March 4, 2023 but no earlier than February 2, 2023 (unless our annual meeting is not within 30 days of the anniversary of the prior annual meeting, and then not later than the tenth business day following the date on which notice of the meeting was mailed or disclosed to the public, whichever occurs first). The notice to our Secretary must contain or be accompanied by the information required by Section 11.J of our trust agreement and must include, among other things: (i) the name and address of the shareholder intending to bring the business before the meeting; (ii) a representation as to the class, series and number of shares that such shareholder owns of record or beneficially and the respective date or dates on which such shareholder acquired such ownership; (iii) a description of all proxies, agreements, arrangements or understandings between the proposing shareholder and any other person or entity (naming each such person or entity) pursuant to which such shareholder has any right to vote any shares; (iv) the general nature of the business which such shareholder seeks to bring before the meeting and the text of the resolution or resolutions which the shareholder proposes that the shareholders adopt; (v) any material interest in such business by such shareholder, including any anticipated benefit; and (vi) with respect to such shareholder or affiliate of such shareholder, whether and the extent to which any hedging or other transaction or series of transactions has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding (including, without limitation, any put, short position, hedged position, borrowing or lending of shares, synthetic or temporary ownership technique, swap, securities loan, option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or any other right or security with a value derived, in part or in whole, from the value of any class or series of shares, directly or indirectly owned by such shareholder or affiliate of such shareholder) has been made, the effect or intent of which is to (A) mitigate loss to, or manage the risk or benefit of share price changes for, or to increase or decrease the voting power of, such shareholder or any affiliate of such shareholder with respect to any shares, or (B) provide the shareholder or affiliate of such shareholder with an opportunity to receive directly or indirectly any gain from an increase or decrease in the value of the shares. In addition, the notice must be signed by a shareholder or shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting and holding, individually or collectively, at least two percent of the shares outstanding on the date of such notice. A copy of the full text of the relevant section of the trust agreement, which includes the complete list of the information that must be submitted to us before a shareholder may submit a proposal at the 2023 Annual Meeting, may be obtained upon written request directed to our Secretary at our principal executive office. A copy of our trust agreement is also posted on our website at www.preit.com.

By Order of the Board of Trustees

LOGO

Lisa M. Most

LOGO

Bruce Goldman

Secretary

April 20, 201522, 2022

 

LOGO


LOGO

PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

THE BELLEVUE

200 S. BROAD STREET, 3rd Floor

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

For All

Withhold

All

For All

Except

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
The Board of Trustees recommends you voteFOR all nominees listed below:
¨¨¨

64    2022 Proxy Statement    LOGO


 

1.      Election of Trustees

             Nominees

01     Joseph F. Coradino        02     M. Walter D’Alessio         03     Michael J. DeMarco        04     Rosemarie B. Greco

05     Leonard I. Korman        06     Mark E. Pasquerilla           07     Charles P. Pizzi                08     John J. Roberts
09     Ronald Rubin

The Board of Trustees recommends you voteFOR the following proposals:

ForAgainstAbstain

2.      ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S

         EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

¨

¨

¨

For

AgainstAbstain

3.      RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG

         LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2016.

¨

¨

¨

NOTE:IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.

Yes

No

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting¨¨

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


You are urged to sign and return this Proxy so that you may be sure that these shares will be voted.

If you vote your proxy by Internet or telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.

You may view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet atwww.preit.com

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Annual Report is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

 

 

 

LOGO


LOGO

PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST ONE COMMERCE SQUARE 2005 MARKET STREET, SUITE 1000 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PEI2022 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D77476-P69682 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR the 1. Election of Trustees Nominees: 01) George J. Alburger, Jr. 02) Joseph F. Coradino 03) Michael J. DeMarco 04) JoAnne A. Epps 05) Mark E. Pasquerilla 06) Charles P. Pizzi 07) John J. Roberts The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. 2. ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. 3. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF BDO USA LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2022. NOTE: IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. For Against Abstain Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

You are urged to sign and return this Proxy so that you may be sure that these shares will be voted. If you vote your proxy by Internet or telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. You may view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet at www.preit.com. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. D77477-P69682 Annual Meeting of Shareholders PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST June 2, 2022 This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE REQUIRED. The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints Joseph F. Coradino, JoAnne A. Epps, and Charles P. Pizzi, and each and any of them, as proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote and act with respect to all shares of beneficial interest of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on April 11, 2022 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, June 2, 2022 and at any adjournment thereof. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY, WHEN DULY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS INSTRUCTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF INSTRUCTIONS ARE NOT GIVEN, THEY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, FOR THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF BDO USA LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2022. Continued and to be signed on reverse side


LOGO

PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST ONE COMMERCE SQUARE 2005 MARKET STREET, SUITE 1000 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PEI2022 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D77478-P69682 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST The Board of Trustees does not have a recommendation for voting on the following: 1. Election of Trustees To elect two additional trustees named in this Proxy Statement for a term expiring at the earlier of (a) the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and (b) such time as all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Outstanding Preferred Shares have been paid in full and the dividends for the then current dividend period have been paid in full or declared and set apart for payment in full. Nominees: 01) Kenneth B. Hart 02) Christopher Swann NOTE: IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGO

You are urged to sign and return this Proxy so that you may be sure that these shares will be voted. If you vote your proxy by Internet or telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. You may view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet at www.preit.com. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. D77479-P69682 Annual Meeting of Shareholders PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST June 2, 2022 This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE REQUIRED. The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints Joseph F. Coradino, JoAnne A. Epps, and Charles P. Pizzi, and each and any of them, as proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote and act with respect to all shares of beneficial interest of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on April 11, 2022 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, June 2, 2022 and at any adjournment thereof. THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY, WHEN DULY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS INSTRUCTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF INSTRUCTIONS ARE NOT GIVEN, THEY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1. Continued and to be signed on reverse side

PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

June 2, 2016

This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE REQUIRED.

The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints Ronald Rubin, Joseph F. Coradino, M. Walter D’Alessio and Leonard I. Korman, and each and any of them, as proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote and act with respect to all shares of beneficial interest of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on April 4, 2016 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, June 2, 2016 and at any adjournment thereof.

THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY, WHEN DULY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS INSTRUCTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF INSTRUCTIONS ARE NOT GIVEN, THEY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, FOR THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2016.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side